Fox New. Rubart Murdoch will be next part of collusion.
 

Fox New had the stormy information before anyone else ( well not b4 the inquirer) but they killed the story because Murdoch supported Trump..

“Good reporting, kiddo. But Rupert Murdoch wants Donald Trump to win. So just let it go," LaCorte reportedly said.


Falzone later sued Fox and reached a settlement that includes a nondisclosure agreement, which prevents her from speaking about the Daniels story, The New Yorker added.



https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4...ion-new-yorker

Imagine the outrage if CNN had been on top o the Clinton email story then buried it.

GFY needs to fix this shit where you constantly get logged out and can't edit your posts..

The mobile version for me is so broken it's only good for reading.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2...ws-white-house

That's the original report from the New Yorker.. However if you're wonder how this becomes collusion. It's because of Trumps actions, by calling all other news sources fake and constantly praising Fox news.

I've said for a long time that CNN, NYT , WP ect.. should sue Trump's WH for using govt office to blast them constantly calling them fake news. What he's doing is illegal and they sue file suit, it;'s a fucking open shut case but they are scared of losing access to the WH. (That's dictatorship shit right there) He then turns around and praises Fox news..

Now we know part of why he's always praising Fox News because they helped him "more" than just the obvious pandering too his base. They actually tried to bury the Stormy report directly attempting to sway the election.

Motherfuck you're a moron.

You forgot about the letter that Stormy issued where she stated that nothing happened.

Trump hasn't done anything illegal you hysterical bafoon.

:pimp

In all fairness the Stormy Daniels/Trump story was published in 2011 by Intouch Weekly

https://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/...erview-151788/

Unless you're referring to the story of her being paid off by Trump?

Oh the difference between your "Fox News" and NYT that you morons call "fake News"..


Fox News sat on the Stormy story as we see here and I posted about this months ago but it wasn't really provable at that point.. Now it is, thanks to "real" journalism unlike what Fox News does..


Meanwhile New York Times the evil liberal fake news.. was the 1st to report on Hillary's emails. They broke the story..

Do you see the difference Red Hats? Don't answer because I already know..

Not about the payoffs... That's the "stormy" story we are talking about not the affair but the pay off, the cover up to keep it from the news..

The affair is not why Trump is in Trouble, it's because he paid her off to help win an election. That's what the story was about. Fox News tried to sit on it just like the Enquirer did. Enquirer of course was directly involved in the payoff..


The Enquirer was drug into the Muller investigation over it's actions and they've already admitted guilt and coped a plea deal.(which they've broken twice already). Now Fox News will be next because it's very obvious due to the catch and kill story now we see Fox News doing the exact same thing. Investigators will now have to know if they were also paid off or did they get all that inside WH reporting and favoritism as payback..


This will and should blow up.. Democrats wont do it because they will be scared to be seen as attacking the media like Trump, but they should have Murdoch on the stand over this.

Fox News is not really news. They only post positive things about Republicans, and negative things about Democrats. I think it was the day they raided Roger Stone's house... The biggest story of the month and it wasn't even on their front page the entire day.

Fox News is basically the Republican version of RT, but they are now part of a conspiracy cover-up..

Republicans are a criminal enterprise now. They've covered for Trump since the day he was annointed POTUS by 304 people in the Electoral College, against the will of the people. Nunes, Gaetz, McConnell, the lot of them. They should be hung for crimes against the nation.

Chump Propaganda TV is what they should rename themselves

I honestly can not see how this is anything but criminal conspiracy. They are now co-conspirators of a crime after the fact.


Cohen is going to jail over this crime, Trump in currently "individual 1" a un-indicted co-conspirator of a felony. That's what "individual 1" is. "individual 1" = co-conspirator of a felony who is not yet indicted co-conspirator of a felony. "Individual 1" =Trump, everyone knows this.

Now we have direct proof that Fox News knew about this crime and failed to report it. They didn't have to report it as a news story but by law they had to report it to the FBI or police..

Their failure to report this crime either to the public via their news capabilities or directly to authorities is a crime. It was a felony so by law they have to report what they knew about it or they also become co-conspirators. When you look at the email where the sole reason they do not want it reported is to help[ Trump win the election.. That's case close they are now co-conspirators to election fraud.

It's really open/shut txt book stuff. They have broken the law, they can't hide behind journalism because they never reported on the story. They instead helped hide the crime for the reason of effecting the election.


Now when you add in Trump's history of "paying" people off or granting them access to the WH if they do good things for him.. Then we see Trump putting Fox people directly into the WH after this cover up. We see Trump giving all sorts of favoritism to Fox news while bashing Fox's competitors.. So now it becomes what did Trump also know about it..

Well it's obvious this all now has to be investigated. I'm not even saying that because I dislike Fox news (yeah I'm a bit happy they are now caught) but it;s all very obvious they are now part of a criminal conspiracy/felony which 1 person is already going to jail and the 2nd has not "yet" been indicted for his involvement because he's the sitting president...

Fox News is now a 4th party involved in this crime..

For the record this was the reporting on this last year but we didn't have any proof of it until now..

https://amp.cnn.com/money/2018/01/16...mpression=true

FInally! THIS TIME, they got him.

Great.

Muh Collusion!

The Latvian version of FoxNews is edited to be pro-russian per FoxNews internal guidelines.

"Translators have to follow Russian subtitling guidelines requiring glossing over or ‘softening content’ concerning accidents, homosexual relationships, ‘anti-Russian propaganda,’ narcotics, extremist activities and suicides. For instance, the translators are instructed to ‘soften’ all negative language about the Russian military and space program, policies of the Russian president and government, while positive texts about same-sex relationships have to be made more generalized so they could be attributed to relationships of any kind."

https://observer.com/2018/04/report-...ent-in-latvia/

Also, FoxNews USA gives a pro Russian slant on all it's news it feeds Americans

"The network’s reports on Latvia for Western audiences—for instance one last month pushed blatant Russian propaganda and cited the Centre for Research on Globalization, a notorious Kremlin disinformation front—likewise deserve investigation."

There is nothing illegal about paying someone to sign a NDA.

You people are hysterical.

If it involves a crime it is... You cant use a NDA to cover up a crime, use some common sense.

Aside from that the NDA isnt the crime.. The cover up and stating it's to help Trump win the election..

Alright Crockett. Serious question, I'll refrain from insulting you... What crime are you referring to? Be specific.

I already stated what crime.. read again if you can't figure it out ..


I'll give you a hint .. Cohen was convicted of campaign finance violations.. Fox News is now a co conspirator after the fact for breaking that law. Ie they helped cover up the crime Cohen was convicted for.. this makes them co-conspirators after the fact..


To add to that the email proves they did it to help fix the election which likely adds more layers to it.

The email is the damning evidence that kills their defense now. We knew they buried the story but couldn't prove it. Now there is emails...

Not covering a story... you think that's a crime?? Sorry Crockett but you're hysterical. They didn't cover it because they covered more important stories. Also at the time Stormy issued her statement saying nothing happened.

There's simply no crime. Cohen was coerced into pleading to something that isn't a crime, as part of the attempt to 'get Trump.' Cohen made the payment himself. Nothing to do with Trump, and not a crime.

Umm It was a crime because Cohen was convicted of it... Why are you trying to deny that? He is going to jail for campaign finance violations as a direct result in paying off Stormy.. You live is fucking lala land if you think Cohen didn't commit a crime and was just tricked into being guilty.. seriously wtf is going on in that head of yours.. :error


Also... Why is Fox now implicated in that very crime? Here I'll let FindLaw.com explain it to you...

https://criminal.findlaw.com/crimina...t-a-crime.html

Accessory After the Fact

While merely failing to report a crime is one thing, helping to conceal a crime is another. A person can generally be charged with accessory after the fact, or aiding and abetting, if he or she wasn't actually present during the commission of a crime, but took actions to conceal the crime or help the perpetrators avoid capture.

For example, hiding a weapon that was used in a robbery will probably make you an accessory after the fact under the laws of most states, even if you took no part in the actual robbery. These incidents of failure to report a crime can have serious consequences. Depending on the severity of the underlying crime, aiding and abetting can be either a misdemeanor or a felony in most states.



Fox News helped conceal and cover up the crime of election finance violation, ie the Stormy Daniels payment. Added to this they are now on record as doing it to "protect" Donald Trump's election campaign.. It's one thing if they didn't want to report the store however it's criminals when their reason for not reporting the story is for the same reasons the payments were made.. (ie protect Trump's campaign)

If Trump worked directly with Hannity or someone at Fox News.... It could be an attempt to cover up a crime.

It already is a attempt to cover up a crime for Fox News.. They Are now co-conspirators in a crime Cohen is going to jail for.

As for Trump his involvement comes down to if it can be proven he knew Fox News helped cover it up. If he did know then that makes him an accessory but also if he gave Fox favoritism due to it.then that's a whole new level.. However on Trump's part it would be likely very hard to prove what he knew unless there is a provable correspondence which I doubt there is.. but who knows..

I mean we all know he knew about it, but it's not what you know but what can be proven. Just like everyone knew last year Fox helped cover this story up but no one could prove it at that time.

Crockett, sorry but that's false. It just demonstrates how desperate the Democrats are to find anything. Paying someone to sign a NDA is not a crime. End of story. Take a minute and read the actual facts:

Michael Cohen Pled Guilty to Something That Is Not a Crime

To the contrary, the law — following our common sense — tells us that the hush-money payments outlined by the U.S. Attorney are clearly not campaign expenditures. There is no violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act.

To reach the opposite conclusion, the U.S. Attorney is placing all his chips on the language “for the purpose of influencing an election.” Intuitively, however, we all know that such language cannot be read literally — if it were, virtually every political candidate of the past 45 years has been in near-constant violation. The candidate who thinks “I need to brush my teeth, shower, and put on a nice suit today in order to campaign effectively” is surely not required to report as campaign expenditures his purchases of toothpaste, soap, and clothing.

--------------------

Even if it's a violation (it isn't) it's just a $15,000 fine. Obama was fined $375,000. Impeach! :1orglaugh

Democrats have nothing to do with this.. I am saying this. No one is even reporting this as what I'm saying, so far as I know. Democrat's wont do anything about this, because they will be scared to be seen as attacking the press.

My bet is Muller's team has already been on this.. That's my bet and if they aren't I'm sure they now will be..

As for the NDA, why do you keep trying to distract with the NDA? I've told you already the NDA was not the actual crime. The NDA will only be used as example of showing their intention was to help cover up the crime Cohen is now convicted of to protect Trump.

The crime was helping cover it up, the NDA was a tool to use in that cover up..


You break a car window with a hammer and steal a purse inside.. The crime is not having the hammer it's stealing the purse, the hammer was just the tool used to steal the purse. The NDA was one of the tools used to cover up the crime..

This doesn't amount to anything. FOX news is under no obligation to report the news because they're not actually news. And even if they were, they can still kill any story they like.

They didn't just "fail to report" they actively par took in the cover up. That is 100% a crime.. They forced their reporter to sign a NDA and said it was to protect Trump's campaign.. That is no longer just not reporting a story, but directly involving themselves in a felony cover up.

Not reporting a story is just taking no action not illegal. Actively forcing your reporter to sign a NDA with the stated reason to protect a presidential campaign, because that campaign was in violation of campaign finance laws (a felony) is breaking the law..


Accessory After the Fact

While merely failing to report a crime is one thing, helping to conceal a crime is another. A person can generally be charged with accessory after the fact, or aiding and abetting, if he or she wasn't actually present during the commission of a crime, but took actions to conceal the crime or help the perpetrators avoid capture.

For example, hiding a weapon that was used in a robbery will probably make you an accessory after the fact under the laws of most states, even if you took no part in the actual robbery. These incidents of failure to report a crime can have serious consequences. Depending on the severity of the underlying crime, aiding and abetting can be either a misdemeanor or a felony in most states.

Acepimp can't distract his way out of this because I case by case show his distraction is invalid. He resorts to posting new topics with 5 year old news claiming it's something new...

Crockett you really should just give up. You seem like a raving lunatic.

You are easily duped by fake news. Trump will not be impeached. Obama was fined $375,000 for campaign finance violations. I don't recall you ranting about how he should be charged. :1orglaugh

OK so you got campaign finance violations? what do you want to impeach him for that? He can't pay a fine and move on like Obama did?

OMG he is gone off the rails. Now fox is guilty of a cover up?? Poor crockett is in stage 4 terminal TDS :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

This is the crime Fox News helped cover up..

They are proven criminals the recording & cancelled checks prove it.

When Trump is broken lies previously he was charged civilly instead of criminally and had to pay. From now on they're going to start charging him & his family criminally instead of civilly.

The Trump connection......




The president reportedly demanded the Justice Department file an antitrust lawsuit to hurt CNN

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019...chable-offense

Seriously! It's actually pretty sad what the lying Democrat media does to people.

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -William Casey, CIA Dir.

Crockett, your news sources are heavily biased and downright misleading.

“Good reporting, kiddo. But Rupert Murdoch wants Donald Trump to win. So just let it go," LaCorte reportedly said.


Falzone later sued Fox and reached a settlement that includes a nondisclosure agreement, which prevents her from speaking about the Daniels story, The New Yorker added.

And the media at large, who lied every single day with fake news, said Trump crowds were 10% of what they actually were and that Hillary crowds were 500%+ larger than they were, dialed down anything negative about Hillary and ran 90% negative Trump stories 24/7 didn't have an agenda and didn't interfere with the election??

Did Obama interfere with the election when he said the Russians would have no influence on the outcome, as well?

https://i.warosu.org/data/biz/img/00...6475315046.jpg

For cuckett cause everyone needs a win now and then
https://i.redd.it/sj76qtnnz2k21.jpg

And now for the cuckett Loss...

President Trump's approval rating continues to climb
William Cummings, USA TODAY Published 1:11 p.m. ET March 4, 2019 | Updated 6:10 p.m. ET March 4, 2019

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...mb/3053565002/

https://www.gannett-cdn.com/presto/2...unds&auto=webp