Pit Bulls strike again....
 

https://www.foxnews.com/us/texas-pet...erriers-police

A Texas woman died on Saturday after she was “attacked by her two pit bull terriers,” police said.

ban women in texas!

OP likes the cock.

Did they lick her to death?

OneHungLo and his fake nics

KILL YOURSELF
You are not one of us

" if you play with fire, you get burned" :2 cents:

↑↑↑ Said the 50 murdered children & parents in church "got what they deserved". Said 17 year old "EggBoy" should have had his teeth permanently knocked out of his mouth for cracking an egg on the head of the hateful racist senator.

Is there any other breed of dog that kills their owners as much as pits do?

the article is kind of misleading. it wasn't "her" pitbull terriers

if your going to run two or more alts at least have a profile for each

Why? The story says her dogs were quarantined (probably for biting people) and she went to the vet clinic where they were being held to feed them. They attacked her while they were being fed.

He's the laziest alt-right hate fake nic troll I've ever encountered online.

He's accidentally posted OneHungLo topics under his other fake nics before, this isn't the first time.

When he goes into his manic phase, like he did yesterday, he'll post multiple threads on the same topic with all of his nics within an hour. AIMike aka Martin aka Huey aka OneHungLo aka Matt26z aka Onwebcam. This is how he tries to artificially control the hate narrative on GFY.

Most aggressive dog breeds ranked:

14.You
13.can't
12.rank
11.them
10.because
9. aggression
8. isn't
7. breed
6. specific
5. it's
4. a
3. learned
2. behavior
1. chihuahuas

GFY mods, do you not see the garbage you're allowing here?

allowing shitposts/reposts of same materials to suit trashy agendas :disgust

But because it was a FauxNews story - there was a total lack of background detail such as the history of the dogs upbringing, how they were treated/mistreated, etc.

Instead, FauxNews just reports the sensationalistic tabloid-style headline to feed the anti-pitbull agenda.

Feel sad for the dogs. Even sadder for the shitstain OP who swallows and diseminates this garbage to feeble idiots.

Dude look at the link in your sig. You're against dog torturing but you're for the breed of dog bred to kill dogs and that kill almost 40k pets and livestock a year in the US.

so now you're making up theories about where i stand on this?

Oh I know you're "it's not the breed" kind of guy. I've seen you on here.

That's how he rolls. He has no issues posting lies.

He'll post a reply with one of his fake nics in 3.. 2.. 1...

The comedy of this silliness is that ALL dogs were or are selectively bred for certain characteristics and traits - be they physical or behavioral... yet you guys want to deny this obvious fact.

That's bordering on some flat earth type denial of simple, obvious facts...

↑↑↑ I was right again :banana:banana:banana

ok so , it's safe to assume you or a family member was hurt by a pit? if yes, then sure we can go that direction of argument

if no, and you're going on headlines and attention, then whatever

or if other? please explain

Yes - and if you know anything about dogs you'd know those behavioral traits can be turned on or off depending on their upbringing and treatment.

No, you can't switch a gene off or cause a gene not to express itself by petting the animal and calling it a part of the family.

A blue heeler will still try to herd you, your kids, your friends, cars, sticks, trees, other dogs etc etc etc without ever being trained to do it or having been around other blue heelers... and no amount of being nice will make it not want to herd things as it is in their genes and they were bred for that exact trait. It is in their DNA and what they are.

You're wrong - I've seen it many times over the years. And it's pointless arguing with you.

You can't make a sheep dog, not a sheep dog by petting it and calling it a part of the family. period. it is in their DNA.

You can hug and pet and love any animal you want... even an African Lion and have a relationship with it, it can become affectionate and it won't kill you (as long as you don't violate some basic rules), but you won't change the fact that it is an African Lion. Further, you would have to be a fool to be shocked when one day it acts like an African Lion.

You can't argue that dogs are not bred for behavioral and physical traits and that pitbulls have been bred for both. They are.

You can say you love pitbulls all day long and thats great and fine... but to deny what is in their DNA (or any dogs) is silly. This is why there is breed specific legislation and no one has successfully argued against it.

I know you didn't miss the part where I said it was pointless arguing with you, since you quoted it.

But that didn't stop you from continuing on and putting words in my mouth.

But continue arguing with yourself if it gives you satisfaction.

I have two dogs to walk.

You can declare me "wrong" but can't explain how a gene that makes a sled dog pull a sled, the one that connects the movement to the brains rewards center,... can magically go away because "you've seen it". or the gene that makes a whippet sprint... or the gene(s) that make a blue heeler herd everything... or the genes that make a hunting dog like a Pointer, point... or the genes which make a German Shepherd protect... etc etc etc etc etc.

You can't make genetic traits go away as the genes are still there and still expressing themselves and those traits will always be present and "i've seen it" isn't a great explanation as to how you can do this.

Again, you can have an African Lion in your home for it's entire life, you can love it and play with it, feed it and sleep with it and it can nuzzle you and lick you,... it can play wiht your kids day and night and all can be ok... but nothing will change what it is genetically and the "it's the owners fault" is weak as it fully discounts what a lion is, how a lion acts, hunts, kills etc.

The reason this is a wholly pointless discussion is anything you might say isn't going to change fifty-five years of experience not only living with and raising a wide variety of breeds of dogs, but knowing many, many others who also have.

So in other words, its exactly like 55 years of Scientology or 55 years of Flat Earth or 55 years of any firmly held belief system where facts are 100% irrelevant?

pitbulls are literally billions of times less likely to kill you than a white trash shooter :thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

When that's your best retarded analogy, we're done.

Belief is belief. A scientologists also "observes" facts that support the idea that scientology and its core tenets are valid and real. That is no different than you proclaiming that in 55 years, you've "observed...". We have all also observed pitbulls murdering old women and babies for 55 years.

You have yet to make a single argument and have just randomly declared me "wrong".

Genetics is genetics.
It wasn't my invention,

Dogs are bred for physical and behavioral traits.
That cannot be disputed.

Pit bulls were selectively bred to fight. It's in their DNA, End of story. Having one that doesn't fight, doesn't attack or that likes kids doesn't change that fact or change the darkness that is lurking in their DNA.

Genes are genes.
It is that simple.

Every higher animal with a brain is a product of both genes and environment, as are humans. But neither determine outcome on their own. One does not cancel the other either.

There are laws restricting the ownership of pitbulls because of this very fact.

It's so true. My neighbor just had border collie puppies, only a few weeks old and they are already rounding up the chickens into their pen... All in the DNA, never been shown how.

theres this interesting thing trump brains fall for, it is called marketing...you guys are not too smart so when somebody says "battle dog" you fall for the bullshit..."fighting dog" was a sales gimmick...

dog fighting was never that popular...however a strong and faithful guard/companion dog was a very sought after item...the huge bulk of pitbulls did not and do not fight...this shit about fighting DNA is obviously flawed by the lack of battle...furthermore dogs that displayed aggressive behavior towards humans were culled...would you want something that will probably kill you? no? well neither did anybody else....there are 5.000.000 pitbulls in the USA and they kill waaaaaay waaaay waaaaay less people than the white man for example...your "DNA" argument is flawed at the most basic level...

the huge bulk of all pitbulls never saw a fight...but your butthole has considerable structural damage :2 cents::2 cents:

Note it says " fatal"..

https://thumbor.forbes.com/thumbor/1...ogs_Forbes.jpg

haha that's one of the biggest lies told by you pit flat earthers. Some of the top fighters were known "man biters" that had special instructions when dealing with them. As a matter of fact, one of John Colby's top fighting pit bull killed his nephew. These man biters were some of the top $ fetching stud dogs that many pits come from today.

You really have no idea what you're talking about like most shit you spew on this forum.