![]() |
Everyone who works in the White House were denied security clearances
Let me see if I understand this correctly... Twenty-five people who worked or works for the White House applied for security clearance and were denied and then over ruled by President Trump. Most of these people had no qualifications and no experience to work in the White House and the President - who has no qualifications and no experience in security matters or foreign policy - decided to over turn them.
The people involved include Jared (who has business ties to foreign countries), Ivanka (her only qualification is running a charity foundation illegally and a small fashion company), and Micheal Flynn who was removed from office after lying bout contacts with the Russian government. This is insane. We have someone with no qualifications or experience giving security clearances to people with no qualifications or experience after security officials have denied them. What could go wrong here? Can someone please explain to me how Ivanka Trump - who isn't qualified to be a night manager at Burger King - has a security clearance? |
It's a fucking clown show. The history books won't know where to begin on this bunch of maggots.
|
You guys have a terrible track record when it comes to getting actual facts
https://russianuniverse.files.wordpr...ry-clinton.jpg :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Trumpers bend-over for Trump.
|
money over ethics
|
Just another example of what lowlife's Democrats are
|
I don't know why you think that some job qualification is the criteria for a security clearance. It has nothing to do with it.
Speaking from experience, former Secret clearance holder. |
Quote:
|
Do you understand the definition of the word "everyone?"
|
Good thing the former secretary of state had security clearance and understood the importance of secure e-mail communication at the highest levels of government, oh wait,,,,,
|
I suppose he can at least count on Ivanka as being one person who probably won't stab him in the back.
Probably. No guarantees, though. |
We should invent the Obama test - you are only allowed to excuse things Trump does if you would have excused Obama doing the same things.
So: who would have said "no big deal" if Obama overuled 25 denied security clearances? |
Notice the alt right deflecting and not arguing against the facts
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
No. And I doubt very much that she can be confident that this trust will be reciprocated. :2 cents: |
Quote:
"what about the Benghazi emails" is what you scream whenever Trump has another brainfart. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
When I said "everyone in the White House" I meant "nearly everyone of importance in the White House". Most of the President's closest advisers were unable to get security clearances. Let's set aside the fact that none of these people are qualified to be in the White House.... His own daughter and her husband were unable to security clearances. Our government is being run by people who have zero qualifications and zero experience - none at all. What is Ivanka's qualifications - she used daddy's money to create a small fashion company where she ripped off everyone else's designs? What else? She a ran her daddy's charity foundation (where the broke every law possible and it was shut down?). This woman shouldn't be allowed in the White House no less working there. Her husband is even worse - he owes billions to foreign governments. National Security Adviser John Bolton... Couldn't get a security clearance. How would you consider someone who is denied a security clearance for such a position? It's the blind leading the blind. |
Quote:
These individuals had a wide range of serious disqualifying issues involving foreign influence, conflicts of interest, concerning personal conduct, financial problems, drug use, and criminal conduct," |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is ZERO reason for Ikanka Trump to have security clearance. None at all. She shouldn't be in the White House unless she is visiting her father. What exactly is her job, and what exactly has she done? Her job is very vague, she seems to have nothing to do, and has accomplished nothing other than passing a small little noticed bill about childcare. Other than moving an embassy and pissing off everyone in the middle east outside of Israel, Jared hasn't done anything either. |
Quote:
that slip your mind or does the brother with big ears get a pass for being black? just curious "While estimates that the overall cost for building the website had reached over $500 million prior to launch, the Office of Inspector General released a report finding that the total cost of the HealthCare.gov website had reached $1.7 billion." |
Quote:
I've gotta think this deters from your input of knowledge, just saying homey. seriously you argue with a guy that has been though the process and definitely knows more than you about it. :2 cents: |
Quote:
it will,help you sleep at night if you you do however that is a childish pipe dream. as soon as obama left creepy shit started pouring out of justice. and oddly enough the GOP was targeted. the billions of dollars obama passed out was never accounted for, think trump could do that? 2 cents: do you remember when the IRS under obama's direction was targeting charities that obama didn't agree with? no investigation. remember when big ears spent almost 2 billion on a website that doesn't work? remember when putin took the ukraine and obama's comment was "gee I hope gay athletes win in the olympics? (ROCHARD I WAS ASHAMED OF THE PRES AT THAT TIME, so I understand feeling shame toward the gov..) for you to actually THINK that the DNC is honest and GOP is not, is a really really REALLY crazy idea, how old are you anyway? santa clause come by your place this xmass? |
Quote:
at least that's what i take from this incoherrent rambling but that you have a problem with gay people I vividly remember from the emails you sent me complaining about the gay mafia that is taking your work away. Or something like that. you need help, man. |
Quote:
https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-06-14-00350.asp Why are you talking about a healthcare website when the thread is about security clearances for people who shouldn't be in the White House no less having a security clearance of any kind? Oh, I see. Defect. You cannot explain why a failed businessman and former game show host is handing out security clearances like lollipops to children who shouldn't have them. But you want to talk about healthcare, let's talk about healthcare. Obamacare is the law, and it's working great. It's reduced my healthcare costs and made it affordable. Republicans know this and they don't want to change anything. Trump promised to "repeal and replace" Obamacare, and just yesterday told the world he is going to put it off until after 2020. Because, you know, four years of accomplishing absolutely nothing makes it so difficult to keep a single promise Trump made. But hey, Trump sure has a lot of time to golf now doesn't he? |
Quote:
My thread title was "Everyone who works in the White House were denied security clearances". It should have been "Twenty-five people who work closely with the President in the White House have been denied security clearances". Do you see the difference between the two? Both convey the same message, but one is a lot shorter and more proper for a thread title. But hey, whatever, you can debate healthcare or thread titles instead of discussing the hard cold truth.... Dozens of people who shouldn't be in the White House for any reason now have security clearances although they were originally denied security clearances. But.... The emails... http://rochardsbunnyranch.com/rock/emails.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And why don't you learn fucking English? Everyone does not mean nearly everyone, or just some people. idiot. |
Quote:
Thus you are the "Old Man". |
Quote:
|
As opposed to having a community organizer as president?
|
Quote:
|
#whatifobamadidit
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Here is what secretary of state is responsible for. www.state.gov/secretary/115194.htm |
Quote:
He just doesn't look like it because his favorite food is pizza. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Odd, why aren't you wanting to debate the "real" unemployment rate? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123