GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Sadiq Khan: There are too many white men on Transport for London

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Sadiq Khan: There are too many white men on Transport for London (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1312909)

Sadiq Khan: There are too many white men on Transport for London

https://i.imgur.com/PAJnDTv.png

How the fuck did this terroristic anti-white pile of shit get elected?

Anyone? How?

Quote:

London's transport authority is far too dominated by white men, Labour's mayoral candidate Sadiq Khan said today.

There are currently 13 white men on the Transport for London board and just three women. Khan said he would ensure the board better reflected the "diversity" of Londoners if he becomes mayor.

"I will reshape TfL's board," he said during a speech in Brixton this morning.

"It needs to better reflect London's diversity in the interest of Londoners. Did you know there are 16 people on the board of TfL?

"Thirteen of them are white men. Thirteen. Think about it . It only has three women on it. That's less than one in five. "

He suggested the needs of women and ethnic minorities were being neglected as a result.

"Women face specific challenges on our transport network that are not currently being addressed. I was appalled about the recent decision by British transport police to scrap the sexual violence unit. Reports of sexual offences on the London Underground almost tripled over the past five years. As mayor I will take these problems seriously."

Khan today continued to face questions over his policy of freezing transport fares. TfL estimate the policy will cost £1.9 billion over the next five years, when compared to their current business plan which assumes year-on-year fares increases.

Khan has repeatedly rejected TfL's business case assumptions. However, he came under pressure today after it was revealed his own claims about Zac Goldsmith's fares policy is based on the same business plan.

Khan has posted billboards claiming that Goldsmith would raise fares by 17% over the next four years, despite the fact that Goldsmith has not yet made any announcement about raising fares

When asked for the source of the 17% claim, Khan told Politics.co.uk that it was based on accepting the same fare rise and interest rate assumptions contained in the TfL business case which he has previously rejected.

Asked whether he now accepted those assumptions, he replied:

"I don't. He does. So you can't have it both ways. On the one hand you can't attack me because my plans are different to the business plan, because you're accepting the business plan, but then not accept the business plan. So he's accepted all of the business plan in relationship to investment and infrastructure, he's using the business plan to attack me. In which case you've got to accept the figures and those figures are 17% increases in fares over the next four years and he's not denied it."

Khan denied that he was also trying to "have it both ways" by using the business case against Goldsmith and instead called on the Tory candidate to answer whether he accepted TfL's fare rise assumptions

"He's the only mainstream mayoral candidate, and this is the fifth election so far, who has not explained his fares policy going into the election and hopefully your fantastic journalism will get it out of him."

Goldsmith today released his transport manifesto. There are no specific pledges on fare levels within it. However he does promise that he will use new revenues from using underground tunnels to host broadband cables, in order to "bear down on fares".

Politics.co.uk have asked Goldsmith's campaign to comment on Khan's claims that the Tory candidate will raise fares by 17%. We have not yet received a response.

https://www.politics.co.uk/news/2016...nsport-for-lon

I'm more than amused when ordinary people react negatively to the liberal nuthouse which happens all too frequently these days in order to keep democratic power for much longer.

Your days are over nutjobs, suck it. :2 cents:

You are a white nationalist.

Your American white christian alt-right terrorists are killing innocent unarmed white Americans in church.

Why are you trying to shift focus to countries thousands of miles away?

Because you're a christian alt-right terrorist and you want to keep killing Americans in American churches.

he was pushing for more women to get jobs...oh the racism...

Sadiq Khan...the man who fixed London's knife crime problems. No, wait....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bladewire (Post 22466460)

You've become so radical even your fake nics don't want to associate with you :2 cents:

Enjoy your dead board :evil-laug

Quote:

Originally Posted by crucifissio (Post 22466566)

he was pushing for more women to get jobs...oh the racism...

Then why say "white" men. Why not just there are too many men?

If he was white and said there were too many blacks in prison or too many blacks committing crime they would arrest him.

Would you go to Japan and complain there were too many asians in government? Or too many asian police officers?

When the backlash comes against these globalists, muslims, jews, and other enemies of Western Civilization, it's going to be fucking harsh.

Sadiq Khan and his (((backers))) deserve everything that is coming to them.

It's funny af watching white racist americans trying to figure out how to use the victim card now that they're an endangered species.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dead Eye (Post 22466676)

It's funny af watching white racist americans trying to figure out how to use the victim card now that they're an endangered species.

Clearly you’re not a proponent of history.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker (Post 22466719)

Clearly you’re not a proponent of history.

Your people (alt-right terrorists) are killing white Americans in American churches... genocide

The loony leftists support this dude's racism and pro-terrorist stance.

What a bunch of scumbags.

:rasta

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye (Post 22466665)

^^^

Supporting violence against people he doesn't like.. Kinda just like radical Islamist..

Quote:

Originally Posted by DukeSkywalker (Post 22466719)

Clearly you’re not a proponent of history.

^^^^

Watching as he becomes more and more radicalized.. Next he will be encouraging violence just like Hawkeyee

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22466742)

^^^

Supporting violence against people he doesn't like.. Kinda just like radical Islamist..

I'm just observing and making an informed prediction.

European history is full of hundreds of examples of things like this happening.

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 22466743)

^^^^

Watching as he becomes more and more radicalized.. Next he will be encouraging violence just like Hawkeyee

He's always been into violence. Have you seen his content? Facialabuse.com and that's just the tip of the iceberg :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hawkeye (Post 22466764)

I'm just observing and making an informed prediction.

European history is full of hundreds of examples of things like this happening.

fuck off fake nic you're such a coward you can't even have your own identity here you worthless piece of shit just die idiot

Facial abuse is dukes?

I use to like that shit, now knowing what he feels when making them lil blacks girls vomit... even if they consent (I'm sure they dont know his racial views)... it's different.

Props for living your dream tho. See sig and remember our bet.