|
Can you imagine Bosa pointing his fingers at the US crying about white supremacy..
When he lives in a country that's exclusively white? wtf :1orglaugh
|
You do enough crying for everyone
|
Quote:
Actually I was thinking about you today when I read 74% of dreamers are on government assistance. lovely. |
Quote:
Look it's a Racist. https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...B-uIbf58AR3Zkp http://www.davidbedrick.com/wp-conte...5/11/shame.jpg https://media1.giphy.com/media/EIUtqBs5nJCXS/giphy.gif |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Why are dumb libs such hypocrites?
Bosa lives in a country that is exclusively white...and yells at everyone else for being a white supremacist :1orglaugh Bosa why don't you want to live around anyone other than white people? |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Where are you guys in the photo. Finding racist waldo https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.ne...e-1024x684.jpg https://bloximages.newyork1.vip.town...ize=1200%2C800 https://static01.nyt.com/images/2017...isable=upscale |
Quote:
everyone who's not racist like you, you say is surrounded by white people. You're in Boston there's hardly any blocks there and you're the most racist city in America. Get a new schtick this one's getting old. can say every single person who disagrees with you lives in the pure White area and is privileged if you live in the ghetto with the blacks and you know what it's really like lol |
Quote:
https://d3bzyjrsc4233l.cloudfront.ne...c59af0dea6.jpg |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yet you live in Boston with a measly 7% black population and you bitch and moan day and night about non whites. Move! According to your own logic that would be your solution. Just do it |
https://media0.giphy.com/media/xUPOq...E3Is/giphy.gif
https://media.makeameme.org/created/o-really-ya.jpg https://c.o0bc.com/wp-content/upload...478$large.jpeg Well this explains everything. Of course you live there. It's in his DNA. Shocking!!!! The Direct Line Between Slavery And Racism In Boston https://www.wbur.org/cognoscenti/201...-malamud-smith http://growintosomethingwonderful.we...71063_orig.jpg When the Klan Came to Town When the Klan Came to Town | Boston Review What's the Worst Place in America to be Black? - Boston What's the Worst Place in America to be Black? |
Quote:
|
This is great - a fake nick calling out a fake nick.
|
Quote:
https://mlifestyle.org/wp-content/up...diversity1.jpg |
Dude your opinions are irrelevant when you live in an exclusively all white country lol.
|
https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/opini...ed-them-yellow
The Chinese were white – until white men called them yellow Europeans referred to East Asians as white until the end of the 18th century But as the Chinese and Japanese resisted cultural assimilation they darkened – both in Western eyes and their own How did East Asians come to be referred to as yellow-skinned? It was the result of a series of racial mappings of the world and had nothing to do with the actual colour of people’s skin. In fact, when complexion was mentioned by an early Western traveller or missionary or ambassador (and it very often wasn’t, because skin colour as a racial marker was not fully in place until the 19th century), East Asians were almost always called white, particularly during the period of first modern contact in the 16th century. And on a number of occasions, even more revealingly, the people were termed “as white as we are”. The term yellow occasionally began to appear towards the end of the 18th century and then really took hold of the Western imagination in the 19th. But by the 17th century, the Chinese and Japanese were “darkening” in published texts, gradually losing their erstwhile whiteness when it became clear they would remain unwilling to participate in European systems of trade, religion, and international relations. Calling them white, in other words, was not based on simple perception either and had less to do with pigmentation than their presumed levels of civilisation, culture, literacy, and obedience (particularly if they should become Christianised). Swedish botanist and physician Carl Linnaeus decided that varieties of homo sapiens could be similarly separated into four continental types, one of which was called homo asiaticus. The colour of that group, he said, was fuscus, which can be best translated as “dark”. This was in 1735. https://cdn2.i-scmp.com/sites/defaul...770_233208.jpg Linnaeus’ racial classifications from 1735. On the left, homo sapiens is divided into four kinds, one of which is H Asiaticus and identified as ‘fuscus’, or dark. Evidently there was some difficulty deciding on a precise colour for Asian Man, since the other three types, European, African, and American, could be “unproblematically” identified according to already accepted stereotypes of white, black, and red. In the tenth edition of Linnaeus’ taxonomy, however, published in 1758, fuscus was silently changed to luridus, meaning “lurid”, “sallow”, or “pale yellow”. The reasons for this alteration were never explained, although luridus also appeared in several of Linnaeus’ botanical publications to characterise unhealthy and toxic plants. Was Asian Man also to be viewed as sickly or dangerous? https://cdn4.i-scmp.com/sites/defaul...72x_233208.jpg Swedish botanist and physician Carl Linnaeus decided that varieties of homo sapiens could be similarly separated into four continental types, one of which was called homo asiaticus. Later theorists complained about Linnaeus’ overly rigid continental labelling but accepted the notion that mankind could be divided into groups, and that each group should embody a different colour. In 1795, the German anatomist Johann Friedrich Blumenbach offered a five-race scheme that featured what might be called our first unequivocal labelling of Asian yellowness, couched in a bizarre series of comparisons that stressed the relative decay or lifelessness of the so-called intermediate races. This human variety, he wrote, was “yellow [gilvus] or the colour of boxwood, halfway between grains of wheat and cooked quinces, or the colour of sucked out and dried lemon peel: familiar to the Mongolian peoples”. Chinese students at a US university were told to speak English. Simple racism, or something more? The most significant aspect of Blumenbach’s conception was that for the first time all the peoples of the East had been lumped together into an explicitly racial category, here called the Mongolian, which was to become just as menacing and fateful as its much more notorious sister term, Caucasian, which was introduced at exactly the same moment. It is crucial to understand that it was not simply that Asians had been coloured yellow in 1795; Mongolians had. https://cdn1.i-scmp.com/sites/defaul...72x_233208.jpg In the late 18th century, all the peoples of the East were lumped together into an explicitly racial category, called the Mongolian. “Yellow” was thus a racial marker that had meaning only in relation to the other colours, all of which were defined as against white “normality”. In Blumenbach’s case, Europeans were in the centre of a racial tableau flanked by “Mongolians” and “Ethiopians” with “Americans” and “Malays” in between (Malay was a new, fifth race, comprising the inhabitants of the South Pacific and Australia, only recently discovered). The yellow race became invested with associations that insured that its physical and cultural features were different (or, rather, deviant) from the white European norm. And for other thinkers far more racially virulent than Blumenbach, the races became part of an explicit hierarchy with European white at the top and African black at the bottom, with the “intermediate” races somewhere in the middle. The problem was exactly where in the middle they were, and how to measure that supposed distance. https://cdn3.i-scmp.com/sites/defaul...00x_233208.jpg Nineteenth-century medical research frequently attempted to define the ‘yellow’ race as embodying physical conditions that distinguished them from Caucasians, including the ‘Mongolian eyefold’ (a fold of skin covering the canthus or inner corner of the eye). Nineteenth-century medical discourse did much to define the contours of the yellow race, although the emphasis here was on “Mongolianness” rather than colour. Medical research frequently attempted to define the race as embodying certain physical conditions that distinguished them from Caucasians, including the “Mongolian eyefold” (a fold of skin covering the canthus or inner corner of the eye), “Mongolian spots” (congenital bluish marks appearing in infants on their lower back or buttocks), and “Mongolism”, today known as Down syndrome. Each of these conditions was at first supposed to be endemic to the Mongolian race only (and hence their names), and much as in the anthropological obsession with human measurement, these conditions purported to show how the yellow race differed from the healthy and fully developed normality of white European bodies. https://cdn1.i-scmp.com/sites/defaul...00x_233208.jpg ‘Mongolian spots’ were another characteristic said to belong to the ‘yellow’ race. It was at the end of the 19th century that the notion of yellow became canonised in every European language (and East Asian ones). This was the invention of the so-called Yellow Peril in 1895, brought into worldwide circulation by an illustration made after a drawing by Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany and designed as a call to arms for European nations to protect themselves from the potential onslaught of East Asian military aggression, social degradation, and emigration to the West. The most immediate danger at this time, it was perceived, came from Japan, which had recently defeated both Russia and China in armed conflict and had begun to build an empire of its own. The invention of the so-called Yellow Peril in 1895 was brought into worldwide circulation by an illustration made after a drawing by Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany. https://cdn4.i-scmp.com/sites/defaul...72x_233208.jpg It was also at this time that ideas about a yellow race began to be imported into East Asian cultures themselves, along with many other facets of modern Western science and technology. As might be expected there were a wide variety of responses, rejections, and incorporations, not only to the idea that there were yellow people but also to the contention that all East Asians could be lumped together into a single racial category. In China, for example, the yellow race was often seen as an appealing notion since yellow was such a significant colour in Chinese culture (such as the yellow river and the Yellow Emperor). Perhaps the Chinese were gold-coloured people, far superior to white Westerners, who were merely silver. In Japan, however, yellow carried no such positive associations and the colour category was frequently rejected. “The Chinese were yellow,” it was sometimes said, “not we Japanese, who are far superior to the Chinese and on a par with the Western imperial powers.” Many in the West agreed, even though the Japanese could not escape the stigma of being, after all, “coloured” people, maybe not as yellow as the Chinese but certainly not white. Is Australia really that racist? These stories of reception in the Far East require more research, but for now, it is clear the invention of yellow in Western racial thinking cannot be traced to a Chinese source. Yellow was a fantasy like all other racial groupings. It cannot be traced back before the end of the 18th century, and it had no basis in anything other than an attempt to distance certain peoples of the world from an equally fantasised concept of whiteness. Is it not time that we stopped using this term? Why are we still calling people yellow? |
^ Bosa lives in a white supremacy lol Bosa lives in a country that's 99% WHITE |
Quote:
|
Bosa have you seen a black person in real life? |
Quote:
I never had any posts removed. You got the wrong guy. |
TBH OP, Black people should start lynching you Red Hats.. If I was a black guy and had to deal with you racists everyday.. I'd get me some brothers and start stringing up a Red Hat every weekend..
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You should know better than to believe that lying stalker troll :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Not all white people are like you and your fellow racist inbred redhats. Yall a different dying breed of genetically fucked individuals. So him living in a "exclusively white" country doesn't mean anything. |
Quote:
http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/...n-protest2.jpg http://unevenearth.org/wp-content/up...2.23.00_pm.png https://i.pinimg.com/originals/dd/0a...5902731f08.jpg https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...HgtFSqltvCpLfi https://eji.org/files/styles/header_...?itok=yFNc8OCv https://www.usnews.com/dims4/USNEWS/...rhousing_quote https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...DgGvg17TLa8fdQ |
Quote:
He has an agenda so yeah his country and the demographics where he lives does matter. And don't you think it's pretty hypocritical to be preaching about diversity when you live in the most non-diverse area on the planet? Whatever happened to walking the walk and talking the talk? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Yeah man... this is an American based board. Trump is the hot topic. With trump comes the racist topics cause... trump. So all that other shit you want him to talk about is kinda irrelevant.
You can feel free to start your own conversations/threads about those things tho. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m picturing the people in my neighborhood when i lived there across from Mass Eye & Ear. I can’t really say they lived there as they maybe were relatives or visitors. I knew some neighbors that were black. I haven’t been there in years but can’t believe it’s so racist. I’d say it may be neighborhood racist. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
pack it up and leave! maybe you need ice to escort you out??? i bet you have over stayed whatever visa you used to gain entrance. |
Whites, European and their descendants, are the superior race. Not because of skin colour but because of culture. Most coloured cultures are rife with infighting, corruption and wars with each other. This makes it easy for them to be invaded and dominated by a race that has learned to work together.
This isn't a new theory, it goes back the the Romans and before. Working together allows a culture to develop faster than one that doesn't work together. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars |
Quote:
A study conducted by Harvard political scientist Robert Putnam suggests that diversity hurts civic life and that differences can actually translate into distrust. That whole "diversity makes us stronger" is not only false, it's the complete opposite. Diversity makes us weaker. Learn it. Know it. Live it |
Let's not forget Europe and Christians have a long history of animosity towards Muslims. Because Islam is determined to take over the world.
In the beginning there was Mohammed invading Mecca and other parts of the ME, but no effect on Europeans and Christians. Then Muslims invaded the Holy Land in 636. Muslims then invaded more of North Africa. The Muslim conquest of the Maghreb continued the century of rapid Muslim conquests following the death of Muhammad in 632 AD and into the Byzantine-controlled territories of Northern Africa. In a series of three stages, the conquest of the Maghreb commenced in 647 and concluded in 709 with the "Byzantine" Roman Empire losing its last remaining strongholds to the then-Umayyad Caliphate. On April 30, 711, Muslim General Tariq ibn-Ziyad landed at Gibraltar and by the end of the campaign most of the Iberian Peninsula (except for small areas in the north-west such as Asturias and the Basque territory) were brought under Islamic rule. Quote:
The Umayyad advance was stopped at the Battle of Toulouse in 721, but they sporadically raided Southern Gaul as far as Avignon, Lyon, and Autun. However, the Umayyad forces continued to campaign northward, until their defeat in the Battle of Tours in 732. After the 732 Battle of Tours-Poitiers, the Franks checked Aquitanian sovereignty, and reasserted their authority over Burgundy, but only later in 759 did they manage to take the Mediterranean region of Septimania, due to Andalusi neglect and local Gothic disaffection. The first Arab siege of Constantinople (674–678) which was unsuccessful and followed up with the 2nd siege 717–718. The campaign marked the culmination of twenty years of attacks and progressive Arab occupation of the Byzantine borderlands. After ten centuries of wars, defeats, and victories, the Byzantine Empire came to an end Constantinople fell to the Ottoman Turks in May 1453. The Ottoman wars in Europe were a series of military conflicts between the Ottoman Empire and various European states dating from the Late Middle Ages up through the early 20th century. The earliest conflicts began during the Byzantine–Ottoman wars, waged in Anatolia in the late 13th century before entering Europe in the mid 14th century, followed by the Bulgarian–Ottoman wars and the Serbian–Ottoman wars waged beginning in the mid 14th century. Much of this period was characterized by Ottoman expansion into the Balkans. The Ottoman Empire made further inroads into Central Europe in the 15th and 16th centuries, culminating in the peak of Ottoman territorial claims in Europe. Now they are thoroughly beaten they're left to invade by stealth. Fighting amongst themselves and some launching terror attacks on anyone who doesn't submit. Any lies by people like Dead Eye about Islam being the religion of peace and Islam being a message of peace is bullshit, or Muslims aren't taking any notice of it. All this information is easily accessed on Google and Wikipedia. I've also left out their invasion towards the East to keep this shorter. That's a whole new story. |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc