I will be available during AVN for any PRODUCTION needs..
 

I dont post much anymore but Id like to put out there ill be in Vegas from Jan 20 -29 and have full gear with me. Capable of 4k production and full still sets. 18 years in the industry and have shot just about everyone and everything. I will also have a location for multiple looks.

Take a peek at some of my samples at AMA Production

Feel free to contact me via email or my cell at 818 822 4856 to discuss any projects. I can also provide full editing for anything shot in any desired formats. Trailers can also be made.

Have a good holiday season and hope to see you in Vegas.

Bumping . . .

Thanks Captain my Captain

My pleasure, have a great 2020 ! !

bump for j

Im looking for new shooting gig Ill be testshooting a couple new concepts in Vegas and will post trailers soon after

'faked' reality stories shot amateur, no cheesy sets, no cheesy porno dialog, no edits be the way to go. the days of 25-30 year old women dressed like teenagers, speaking in high voices prancing around is long gone :2 cents:

Generally speaking, the times when the industry supported 1,000s of independent content creators are over. It wasn't the introduction of digital cameras or even their cost if you can't focus, light a scene or afford a $10,000 for a camera you don't deserve to be in business.

It was the online industry only being able to support a low product which has steadily got worse.

Grapesoda points out the problems this brought, offline if the product wasn't good enough distributors didn't buy. In a market that was supposedly easy to sell to.

Today a few companies buck the trend, by producing a product some customers are willing to pay for. The problem is most have budgets that leave little for the independent content creator or have in-house content creators. Because the root problem is so long as it's free 99.9% of consumers can jerk off to a pretty poor product rather than pay for a good one.

Well then you all may as fucking well quit looking at this board then. Ive been around 19 years and continue to produce quality smut. Maybe im looking to get an in house job. Maybe I'm looking to produce my own stuff. Mr Markham you've been a running GFY joke for a decade. Thought you retired. Maybe I just fucking enjoy my work. Geez.

Produced quality porn? Where?

And of course you enjoy your work, because you wouldn't ever get your dick sucked otherwise

:pimp

:pimp

:pimp

Did I say you didn't produce a quality product?

Are you producing work without it being already sold?
Do you constantly produce work or need more?
Are you allowed large budgets that make you rich?
Do you run a large team of people?

I stated the truth about this industry and its decline. You looking for a job or more work proves me right.

'in house' has been the future for content for last 10 years. more than ever once the tubes puled the money out of site ownership.think of it like car manufacturers. really the only content producers need are for content that is hard to get, like hairy girls or other specific niche content. hairy girls for instance are difficult to find and scattered. it's not like you can go to LA and shoot 20-30 hairy girls every week like teens or exotics. even BBW's aren't that easy to find. in house of your own site is the way to go. :2 cents:

ouch!!! lol!!

IMO people have NEVER wanted the crap produced in porn valley, the stuff only sold because there was nothing else. the proof is that once real amateur came along, good bye vivid :2 cents:

True that!

In-house is cheaper than independent. What we have learned is the acceptance of poor product will win over a better more expensive product all the time.

I'm glad I worked in a time that quality was king.

Can you explain what "porn valley" is? Because the wide variety of styles in the market shows all styles were available. Were Evil Angel "porn valley" style? Customers will choose the style they liked.

The rise of amateur is due to the faked scenes, producers and models not interested in their craft and a move towards poor content. Amateur that is faked is as bad as 25-year-olds pretending to be teens. Also, the price comes into it. The cost of producing a really involved movie was no longer feasible with the loss of cable.

young women dressed like 'imagines whores' wearing too much make up, with weird creepy 90's country music hair saying 'I want your cock' while drooling like retards or anything you produced :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

you worked in a time when A. it took a bit of determination to understand film and B. content was hard to get, relatively. South told me he used to get something like $600 per roll of B&W in the 70's. then 'you' came along and fucked that up :thumbsup

Once again you expose your lack of knowledge of the industry you're in.

Pre-Internet times there were lots of styles to choose from. Private, Evil Angel, Anabolic, Zane, Ed Powers, etc. The consumer chose the style he liked best and if that was Wicked or Vivid or any of the styles I named it was his choice based on previous purchases. There wasn't ever a porn valley style that left the consumer with no choice.

In Europe Amateur sold much better than in America with titles like Ben Dover, Scala, Seventeen, etc.

The swing from the more produced movies to the cheaper to produce was forced by the cost. The decline of cable X rated channels, the dip in sales made spending $50,000 on the content for a DVD unprofitable for most. This decline was brought about by sites offering 50 and up scenes for the same price offline sold 5 scenes for, free porn and the huge number of titles available.

Makeup and hairstyles reflect the time and even today, models say stupid things like "I want your cock"

Another reply exposing a lack of knowledge.

Mastering film isn't that hard with a light meter, on video it's easy with a monitor. As you point out the rewards were there for people who got it right. The problem was producing content the publishers chose from a huge selection offered to them. Image sets making $3,000 a set were common and with that type of return you can be sure of a lot of competition.

The change was the Internet allowed people who could never sell to offline publishers to sell directly to the consumer themselves. Because offline demands an absolute minimum of 5,000 sales per month and online 500 sign ups per month is the minimum.

99% of the 'modern' shooters can't read a meter.

99% of the 'modern' shooters can't read a meter. shooting film before video, there was no monitor

A light meter tells you all you need to know about the light a subject is receiving, the amount bouncing off the subject into the camera lens. It even tells you the best exposure setting for the camera. It's not hard to read but thank you for your compliments on my skills level.

https://cms-assets.tutsplus.com/uplo...ld-meter-1.JPG

A monitor is a TV linked to a camera. Even domestic TVs will do the job. They have been around since the beginning of Video. Stop proving you know nothing about shooting content.

another thread successfully derailed by our photographic and economic mastermind PM

look, you are a dumb fuck, I leaned to shoot on FILM, with a METER. yes there was video assist for shooting 'films' however that was cost prohibitive.

and how do I know that? I worked in motion pictures and television from '82 until '99. aright asshole? in HOLLYWOOD, Ca. I was the in lighting union, the directors guild AND the director of photography guild... I've was in the business BEFORE video, okay? what fucking moron :2 cents:

yes sir you are correct :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

have a nice day :thumbsup

bump for Joe :winkwink:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...icityMeter.jpg

i can read meter?

Anyone in the industry would know about video monitors and how easy it is to measure light with a light meter and adjust a camera accordingly. I learned to do it in a day, it was essential for shooting stills on film. Video was far easier with a monitor. But an experienced person would know that, strange you didn't.

Show us your site to prove you know what's great.

you're delusional, most of the shooters got their gear at kmart :2 cents:

An experienced person knows what a monitor is. You didn't so what does that tell us?

Fucking agreed. I say this all the time. The old porn only sold well because porn valley had a monopoly on production and distribution. Once the markets became more liberated, a lot of those companies went the way of the dodo bird.

Bullshit.

Ed Powers, Buttman, Diabolic Video, New Sensations, Shane's World, Evil Angel, Elegant Angel, Rocco, Ben Dover, Anabolic, Private, Homegrown Video, Beate Uhse AG, Caballero Home Video, Score, Scala, Color Climax, Jules Jordan Video,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_o...aphy_companies were all available on the same shelves as what you call "Porn Valley". The consumer chose the titles he wanted and wasn't forced to buy anything. It was less about marketing and more about quality. The Internet was obsessed with "Marketing" which meant giving away free porn, offline was obsessed with getting repeat sales, selling a brand for years not months. Online the average member stayed a few months.

The reason for the decline of the more produced movies was the budgets required to make it possible. The internet offered 50+ movies for the same price offline charged for 5, plus free porn. Plus a computer was easier for watching porn thana DVD.

We strangled the Golden Goose, well done. :thumbsup

I'm very close with the owners of a couple of those and they say the same exact thing I just did. :1orglaugh

You're delusional, Paul.

Talking to yourself in the mirror again Paul?

I like poo!

sighhhh this went well.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

lol...I have been shooting longer than anyone on this board. I find it amusing.

Paul you’d freak out and wouldn’t believe me anyway If I told you pornstars now sit at home and film themselves fucking their bf and upload it to a few top platforms and many make north of $100k/month.

Quality nor quantity doesn’t mean shit anymore, audience engagement does. I believe a year from now the majority of top name girls and guys won’t shoot for external companies and will just produce for themselves.

I am already seeing this first hand and it’s only going to get worse.

I'm chatting with porn stars and they tell me the opposite. Because all their content is available on Tubes. But if you want to think porn stars are making over $1 million a year, then keep on dreaming. Your company wouldn't be able to hire porn stars as they would be too busy promoting themselves.

$100k/month at how much a scene requires how much traffic?

$5 a scene = 20,000 sales.
@ 1- 200 = 4,000,000 surfers

How many followers do these porn stars have on their social media accounts? Send some of these girls over here and let's hear from them.

I don't know why everyone is saying girls working on their own are making these ridiculous sums. Because no one here is earning anything from it or is it just you want to kid yourself you're in a big industry where a few make millions.

I was in the industry and knew many of the owners, they were the groundbreakers in Gonzo, Reality, Amateur. Are you saying Private, Homegrown and Evil Angel are the same style as Wicked, Playboy and Penthouse?

Contact some of these porn stars making over a million a year and offer to shoot them with their BF. They can afford it. :1orglaugh

Paul,

You've lost the plot.

Between Twitter, Instagram, only fans, patreon, and porn hub.. They are making bank.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You realize who you're talking to? Probably not.

Jordan's forgotten more about this biz in the last 30 minutes than you'll ever know.

Good for you. You've also been irrelevant for over a decade.

you explaining the business to Jordan is the most hilarious thing that has happened on this board for quite a while :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :error

ama next year 2021 I want some transgender content :thumbsup

consumption behavior always changes especially when the delivery model is technology based. it's just sold differently....amateurs and models using ancillary means of earning extra $ isn't anything new :2 cents:

very few girls crack 50k/mo selling (clips, onlyfans, mv. etc) some make 6 figs but they are selling it all (and a very slim %) plus its a full-time hustle including selling molds, feature dancing, shows, cams etc. they are 100% reliant on their fan base so nurture it and it's not easy.

content still sells and is still consumed by traditional means, not as much of course but it still does

:2 cents:

exactly :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh