![]() |
Bareback SEO Question
I have a question that I cannot find answered here so I hope this is not a repeat.
The site bareback.com is a live site. For years, the keyword bareback always listed that site as number 1 or at least in the top three. Now, it does not appear in the search at all. Any suggestions? |
The reason could be that the keyword "bareback" was just "mainstreamized" which means that Google decided to no longer list any porn sites for that KW in the SERPs (or at least in top positions). Sometimes it's temporary but usually it's permanent. It sucks, it happens and there is nothing you can do about it.
|
Maybe you're not updating you're site enough ... and other sites are adding
a shit ton of new content with the same KW and they're pulling ahead of you. Google loves NEW content. If you don't update it'll eventually get you -------- |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I had not heard of Mainstreamized before, so thank you. Do you know if there is a process to go through to remove this? Yes, the content is consistently changing and the articles and forums are updated often and regularly. |
Some will always be (((protected))).
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ya Ok you all know Google algorythyms... I have been officially proven wrong.. or have I?
|
Bareback and "Bareback sex" are both showing no adult sites at all - "Bareback porn" is - The usual suspects are at the top...
You are even in the top 100 for "Bareback porn"..... Sorry, they have screwed you I am afraid... |
Quote:
A quick look at your website is clearly telling there are many issues, all affecting ranking. For example: 1. Speed - it is below standard or anything acceptable https://i.postimg.cc/gjkdLMqp/speed.jpg 2. Domain authority - trust flow is only 2! There is no way to keep up with the competition with such a bad authority, especially for a keyword having 22000 searches per month in USA only. 3. Onsite SEO is bad. Keyword stuffing noticeable from far in meta description and title. Actually, there is keyword stuffing with h2 tags and multiple alt fields using the same keyword. Also, content is thin and not offering any value to visitors (from the perspective of google). Almost no text compared to other sites having over 2K words articles. 4. Citation flow is high and disproportional to TF. This means the quality of obtained links sucks and that site is involved in artificial linking schemes (low-quality link buying). I've randomly checked some of the links to your site and it is clear they are problematic. Some of them linking to your site: The Globe - The world's most visited web pages The Globe - The world's most visited web pages The Globe - The world's most visited web pages https://websitedetection.com/web-site-list-10865 To avoid further spreading of defeatism, one good info. You have an EMD domain, perfect for obtaining long-tail keywords containing bareback. It seems site management made a classic mistake, relying on one "big" keyword instead on multiple related ones. |
^Alternatively, we could lynch Sergey Brin for the crimes of his Bolshevik forefathers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor #BarebackSEO |
Quote:
|
we can offer you a free blog post on nichepornsites.com
contact us on there |
Quote:
My suggestion to the OP is that #BarebackSEO should become a kind of alt-web outlaw thing. |
Quote:
Would you like to list our Indian sites in nichepornsites.com? We contacted you there multiple times but no response Please contact us here or on skype. Skype: support.247mg |
Quote:
Quote:
http://www.mrskincdn.com/mrskin_data...jpg?1468582385 http://www.hecklerspray.com/wp-conte...-bolero-11.jpg |
Try page 100 or now pay.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc