So, who truly knows the background of PornTrack/SexTracker?
 

Some of you will argue, nothing. But there's so much more to come. Let's discuss. I know the whole story. I sold PornTrack to SexTracker. Sort of. When you sign a contract to sell your share and enter into any agreement with another entity to just maintain, would you argue that being required to (not agreed prior to) working at their offices is a breach of contract?

And yes, this goes back to the very start of SexTracker (PornTrack beat ST to the punch). Those of you who know, know.

Now that's a blast from the past!!

I would argue that being required to work at their offices is out of scope of the contract, not a breach of it.

Wow what a blast from the past.

Generally speaking if you sell out to another company and agree to stay on to maintain the product for a certain amount of time... Wouldn't you be required to work out of their offices? It's their company, their product, they decide where their employees work. If this was a "work from home" situation and you are an outside contractor you should be allowed to continue working from home, although that might be subject to change depending on their policy. If you agreed to stay on you would be working as a employee or a contractor, which would be subject to their rules.

I am noticing a pattern of resentment over very old business decisions :2 cents:

to just maintain, i´d expect to work at the offices :2 cents:

The terms should be in the contract. If not specified then, as K0nr4d said, beyond the scope and open to negotiation.

Imho, of course.

.