Annika Sorenstam Prediction?
 

ok, i've been hearing this nonstop yakfest about the girl golfer playing this PGA Tour event this week. So predict her score for her first round tomorrow and if you think she will make the cut.

Whoever gets the exact score tomorrow and guess right about her making the cut wins something. Ask Lensman, he's in charge. If he tells you to fuck off, ask Luc Dubois.


My prediction for Annika Sorenstams first round score:

138 :thumbsup

isn't she the chick playing in T3 too?

74

:glugglug

Sorry to ask, my friend...but do you know anything about golf...??
your mother could do 138 on her first round ever...:)


I would say 67, and ofcourse she makes the cut...she's the best.

Id say a 73

yes I know golf Ancher! And I stand by my prediction - 138!
That's only 68 above par - pretty good for a girl :Graucho

She'll do ok, but probably just miss the cut.

There not letting her play from the ladies tees or anything like that are they?

About 77. She played a practice round on another course with Tiger Woods and finished about 10 shots behind him.

A few years ago, Laura Davies, then the longest hitter on the LPGA tour, played four rounds with a top male player (Nick Price?) and finished more than 35 shots behind.

There is no way Sorenstam will make the cut. In fact, she'll be lucky not to finish dead last.

How long until Playboy puts out its "Ladies of Golf" issue....thats the real issue. :Graucho

if she is as good as they say im thinkin about 78

She's highly disciplined; never chokes under pressure; works out in the gym and the course is perfect for a short accurate hitter so I predict 72.

i predict 79

WOW...:1orglaugh

I know NOTHING about golf, so I will not risk a prediction. I would hope, though, that good women do get to play with the men and NOT vice versa. There's no issue of fairness here for any clear thinker. Men are much stronger than women in sports on the whole, but if a woman can prove she's got the stuff, she should play with the big boys. What point could possibly be made (other than the sad one of humiliation) by a man playing against women? It's like, if you have a sandlot team consisting of guys in their 20's, but if a boy in his teens wants to play and has the talent, why not? But what would be the purpose of the 20's guys insisting then on playing in the teens' games? It could only be for the purpose of humiliation, which a true sportsman should be above.

well she shot a 71 today, pretty damn good but the course was a little slow. it will speed up tomorrow and I'm not sure she can break par which she'll need to do to make the cut.

I predict 71 for Thursday. I'll tell you my Friday prediction tomorrow afternoon.

Give me a break.

1) She hits a 250 off the tee, and she's playing from professional tee boxes, that means she's putting 60-100 extra yards on some holes.

2) She didn't qualify. She got a sponsor position.

67? She got lucky with 71. She won't do better than today.

more important, hows her ass and titties look? oh and does she have a buttah face?

Ref 2) don't know if you know this, but it's a PGA turnament ,not a LPGA turnament she's invited to play at.

About luck...don't think so..

"Not content conquering women's golf, the Hall of Fame player from Stockholm, Sweden, accepted a sponsor's exemption to this week's PGA TOUR event, the Bank of America Colonial, at storied Colonial Country Club in Fort Worth, Texas. Sorenstam's entry represents the first by a woman in a men's event since the legendary Babe Didrickson Zaharias qualified for three events in 1945.
The laconic Swede enjoyed one of the best seasons in LPGA history in 2002 with her 11 victories and record earnings of $2,863,904. With a single-season record scoring average of 68.70, Sorenstam won the most titles since LPGA Tour Hall of Famer Mickey Wright won 11 times in 1964 and earned her fifth Rolex Player of the Year and Vare Trophy awards. She set or tied 20 LPGA records in all. " source LPGA.com