Rumble contacted by the UK government about Russell Brand
 

https://twitter.com/rumblevideo/stat...84927834960196

It looks like Rumble was contacted by the UK government trying to get them to stop his method to make money.

This is at the time they have the new Online Safety Bill.

before you think this does not affect you, think this way. What will stop the UK or any government contacting credit card firms to stop them being used on your porn site. Remember most banks have head offices in the UK so even if you are in the USA, they could stop your funds.

https://i.postimg.cc/T2SJBhz2/1d1k9q.jpg

you would have a valid point, if it was not the fact the I have posted the letter above. Remember RB has not been charged with anything.

So why would you think they would not try to stop porn sites having the ability to earn, if they are stopping a comedian?

Dame Caroline Dinenage has written to the BBC, Channel 4, GBNews and TikTok

Link: https://committees.parliament.uk/com...nvestigations/

Chair's comment:

Culture, Media and Sport Committee Chair, Dame Caroline Dinenage, said:

“This weekend we have seen some very serious and disturbing accusations about Russell Brand’s behaviour and we understand that the police are now looking into some of these allegations. As a first step, our committee has decided that we will today write to media outlets, including the BBC and Channel 4, to understand the actions they are taking as we consider some of the issues around these allegations.

The allegations have been widely described by reporters in the press and on social media as an ‘open secret’ and quite often these secrets are shared between friends and colleagues just to keep each other safe. But my concern is when people in power are aware of rumours or stories yet don’t act, then a culture is allowed to permeate.”

Can someone clue me in as to what this is all about? I've never watched any of Brands content online - I only know the guy as an actor in a couple of movies. I see that he's being accused of assault but was he making money off of this somehow? What was his content generally about?

"Conspiracy theorists" are right once again.
Coordinated attack against Brand is very possible.

ps.
Youtube never demonetized Cardi B after she admitted to drugging & robbing customers in her stripper days. And R Kelly... and and....

Follow Russell on Rumble https://rumble.com/c/russellbrand

He's very smart funny & articulate, logical, fair, etc etc

.... you Far Far left liberals will HATE him.

A lil clip for you:

Musk and rumble told the uk gov to pound sand. They will not act over mere allegations.

Russell Brand is a well-known ladies' man, formerly married to one of the sexiest female pop stars of her generation, Katy Perry.

https://messika.cdn-tech.io/media/ul...ors-2022_5.jpg

https://media.tenor.com/UtDSy6haXKwAAAAd/katy-perry.gif

^ I mean, look at that RACK!

Here he is picking up eight girls at once in 2009:



He has laid thousands of women over the years as he is a massive celebrity with the gift of gab.

Russell began making anti-vax statements recently, and now the media is bringing up allegations from nearly 20 years ago saying he SA'd women. Many people believe "Big Pharma" is motivating these accusation stories to be brought up to discredit/deplatform him since he has a lot of influence and is a threat to these pharma companies' bottom line.



But knowing you're vaxxed to the max, you'll automatically think he's guilty.

Years ago, while Katy Perry was a judge on American Idol, she tricked an innocent, timid young man who never kissed a girl into (you could say "forcibly") kissing on the mouth and she received some "backlash".



Of course, it's all innocent and "no big deal" and "cute" when the genders are reversed.

This whole thing stinks.

I'm no fan of Brand. I think he's a loud mouthed twat who likes using long words to make himself sound articulate when he's not really. He does make one or two good points in his videos though, I guess if you say enough random things some will hit home.

But this whole situation, the way it's been conducted, stinks to high heaven. It absolutely does feel like someone somewhere decided he has to be taken down.

agreed 100%

This is what I gather.

The Times and a TV show on CH4 in the UK has spent 1 to 4 years investigating.

It looks like the women were contacted by the media and not them going to the media.

It is reported that hundreds of women were contacted but most seem to have had a fine experience.

It is reported that the people investigating insisted on phone calls and nothing in writing.

It is reported that those who were fine with him were not used on the show.

All 4 ladies stated they were in a relationship with him and had consensual sex.

The first lady in the documentary states he raped her. The documentary shows a split second text she sent him. Most of the text is then wipes leaving no means no. The full text simply says that she was disappointed he did not use a condom.

She even states she got tested after the event.

The next three claim not rape but him trying it on. They also state he stopped when they stopped him.

The second lady is interesting. She states she was 16 when she dated him. His crime with her was he put his willy in her mouth, but stopped when she punched him.

but the reason she is interesting is she is on BBC 4's woman's hour. They use an actors voice and call her Alice.

At the start they say something interesting. They inform us she works or has worked for TV firms. They also say she worked for many years for The Times and the reporter who dealt with this.

Alice also tells us that RB set the YouTube channel up years ago because he knew these allegations would come out. This is the tin hap belief many on the left are claiming.

The question is what started this investigation?

The allegations seem to be both done in the USA and UK and seem about 20 or so years old. With a new one said to be 2003.

Presumably the USA ones are time limited, so possibly could not prosecute.

The UK I do not believe has time limit on court prosecutions. I think magistrates is six months (tend to be minor crimes).

however unless they have evidence and how long ago it is, one suspects they will not prosecute.

It is reported he has had sex with thousands of women. One staff member claims he was having sex with up to 5 women a night.

If I put my tin foil hat on, the interesting thing is this happened about 3 days before they stated they have passed the new Online Safety Bill.

I don't suppose it's even remotely possible that the allegations are legit?

His criticism of BigPharma, military industrial complex, Bill Gates :2 cents:

It is possible and important not to believe or disbelieve.

The problem he will have is if they do not take hi to court as they were done so long ago,it would mean he will be presumed guilty for life.

Why he look like a cult leader?

When you're part of a triple vax'd quadruple boosted Liberal Extremist cult, like you are, anyone making sense is going to seem weird to you. Reality & truth are now your enemies.

Even if they are, so what? Should we silent all criminals from social media platforms? If so, why?

Cancel culture sucks.

This is just a guess, but it might be that the social media company (YouTube) thinks the evidence is strong enough that it would be better for them to go ahead and drop him instead of waiting months before the case goes to trial.

If the company were to keep him, and if he were to be found guilty, the company would look bad for giving him that much airtime when they should have known better.

Yes, it sounds unfair, but apparently the evidence against him is overwhelming. If Brand is found innocent, he might have a case against the company. So, it's kind of a gamble. But again, the evidence against him must be pretty convincing.

Ultimately, we are talking about a business that has a choice to make and as a consumer you have a choice you can make as well.

My point is, why is anyone advocating for anyone to be cancelled? So what if hes guilty? Are people with a record now not allowed to be on social media or any type of publishing platform?

If so, where do we draw the line and why do we not ask everyone to submit their record to have an account? Because you can comment and that is also publishing.

This is - in my opinion - all about control. Individuals cant be too big and have the wrong opinion or they get muted. They tried with Rogan, real hard. Fortunately they failed.

But you are right, its a business that has a choice to make. But they should not have to be pressured or even encouraged to choose anything. Let people express themselves as long as they Arent posting actual illegal stuff (like CP).

Agree 100% and if you read about Katy Perry's divorce from Brand you will see she found out something that made her very happy they are no longer married. (What that something is she is keeping a secret ?) On the flip side it amazes me that the women who are allegedly assaulted wait 10 years to come forward. Something fishy going on ?





.

Time is irrelevant.

Look at how long it took allegations against Jimmy Saville to appear.

Anyway, at least one of the alleged victims reported his behaviour to his management company and was threatened with legal action.

Yes, in an ideal world you go to the police straight away, but it's not that easy when the person in you're accusing is rich, powerful and famous. Or when the justice system doesn't have a great reputation and it's your word against his.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...a-Baillie.html

Remember she did porn.

Burger King, Asos and HelloFresh pull ads from Rumble as Russell Brand vows to keep publishing videos on the platform despite claims of rape and sexual assault

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ell-Brand.html

absolutely

Not when juxtaposed with current/soon to be current events. The timing is highly suspect. Even so, why would anyone act on mere allegations, let alone a government suggesting that rumble and twitter follow youtubes lead. That’s insane.

You nailed it. Anyone who caves to cancel culture is a cuck.

2much cuck ? :1orglaugh

Lmao!!!
.

True that.

True that. So you must also be VERY against the liberal governments who censored doctors and true information during Covid? Radical left is pissed this is all getting exposed. They hate truth.

Just imagine if these radical ideologies worked with everyone, remember Conor McGregor was accused of rape at an event, Cristian Renaldo too, by this radical left ideology they would have everyone, every sport, everything cancelled. No trials to prove innocence necessary, according to them. If you're accused, you're guilty, if you don't align with the woke cultists.

Democrats are pro-censorship, anti-freedom, and always push for more government control.

2MuchCuck is the grandmaster of cucks.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Nutter just can't help himself.

Even Rose McGowan, a huge advocate of the #MeToo movement, spoke out against this attack on Russel Brand.

Audio conversation with McGowan: https://twitter.com/MarioNawfal/stat...05127243104605

I am very much against all that nonsence that happened during covid and now this circus to try and hide the the fact that those vaccines did nothing to stop the pandemic or even save peoples lives. Perhaps a few fatties didnt die because of the vaccine. But overall, mandating exercise and vitamins would have been more helpful.

But I find it mega amusing that people who were double, triple or even 4 x vaccinated now get covid again lol

You are defending a rapist and comparing it to... checks notes.... being vaccinated.

Typical redacted piece of vile shit. :thumbsup

All that shit you are outraged about, you made that part up.

Yeah, this.

It is easy peasy to use sex allegations or the hint of sex allegations to take someone down. It alleges a crime with absolutely no requirement of legal proof, only hearsay or I say. Looks like it's Brand's turn in the barrel.