🚨 Rape Allegations Against Rocco Siffredi Resurface
 

One of the most recognizable names in the adult film industry is once again under fire.

Multiple performers are coming forward accusing Rocco Siffredi of rape, coercion, and abuse—claims that have haunted his career for over two decades but are now being amplified by a recent investigation on Italian TV program Le Iene.

British performer Scarlett Jones says her consent was misrepresented on set, describing the so-called “consent video” as a scripted performance made before any real boundaries were established—and ignored shortly after.

“It wasn’t real consent,” she said. “I was pressured into acts I’d already said no to.”

Other performers are sharing similar experiences, sparking a reckoning in the adult industry over what consent really means—and how power is abused when performers lack protection.

🌟COERCION IS NOT CONSENT 🌟

And this isn’t just about one man—it’s about a broken system that shields stars and silences victims.

📢 Read the full story at Fleshbot 🔗 https://fleshbot.com/biz/post/rape-allegations-against-rocco-siffredi-resurface/

I cant read it from the UK, as apparently my 'State' has blocked me?

Be interesting to see what the courts have to say. Im sure you'll find everyone agrees that COERCION IS NOT CONSENT but we also remember individuals who have been falsely accused before and punished without evidence or proof much less a court case filed.

Thanks for sharing

In 2025 women can do anything they want and the corrupt courts will go through mental gymnastics to enable them . You gotta be nuts to be running around banging multiple women. Best to find one woman who does not have any cluster B personality disorders and stick with her. Always look at their court records to see if she has had any involvement with protection orders. Also check police records for all contacts they have made with officers. I am actually shocked there have not been more allegations toward producers by former models who want their content taken down or a site that they agreed to do scenes for 1,000. After the rise of OF there are thousands of models now pissed off they sold their performances for bread crumbs while newer models are making millions. What would Ashlynn Brooke,, Bree Olson, or Lorena Sanchez be making if they were 19 years old and on OF? They certainly wouldn’t be living with some fleabag agent in the valley that’s for sure. They’d be living in a mansion that they purchased. Can you imagine the regret?

In the Danny Masterson case a corrupt fleabag judge in California ruled that the statute of limitations is not valid because there was more than one woman making an accusation.

If you have any fame and/or money, you are a target.

However, it’s difficult to have any sympathy for any man who gets accused because almost all of them are simps and they fully support this clown show false allegation gravy train until it happens to them or somebody they care about.

I worked on Navy NCIS and that creepy goth actress (I won’t even say her name) was so vicious with her false allegations that Mark Harmon (nicest guy in Hollywood) refused to be in the same room with her. Her scenes were almost always in a lab and she was not really ever seen on set. Then to buy her off CBS gave the cunt her own show just to placate her and get her away from their cash cow. That demonic cunt took out a protection order against her husband then stalked him at our local sushi restaurant then called police and had him arrested. This is where your tax dollars go. Enjoy simps! You are all pieces of shit.

I heard good things about him from one model who worked with him directly. :2 cents:

As a Father of Daughters
 

I’ve been thinking a lot about the statement “coercion is not consent” in light of these allegations against Rocco Siffredi. As someone who’s survived abuse myself (details aren’t your business), I get why people say coercion isn’t consent—especially when you’re young or unaware you can escape. But once I realized I could leave my own bad situation, it changed how I see this. If you’re able to walk away and don’t, is it really coercion—or just a choice you regret later?

Let me be clear: rape is wrong. Physical force is wrong. I once woke up to neighbors asking me to protect a stranger—my future wife—from two men trying to harm her. If she’d let them “talk” her into something, I’d say that’s on her. Courting is about persuading someone to say yes willingly, but there’s a line. When I looked up “coercion,” I found it’s about pressure—sometimes threats, sometimes subtler manipulation—that makes someone act against their will. That’s stuck with me.

Here’s where I’m at: if you’re being coerced but can leave and don’t, I think it’s worth asking why. As a father of daughters, I’ve taught mine to be smart, to avoid trouble when they can. It’s not their fault if someone hurts them, but it is their responsibility to not put themselves in harm’s way if they’ve got a choice. If you keep stepping into danger, you can’t always blame others for what happens.

That said, these allegations—like performers saying their “no” was ignored—make me wonder. Power, fear, or pressure can mess with your ability to just “leave.” Maybe it’s not as simple as I’d like.
What do you think—where’s the line between responsibility and coercion?

Rocco has been abusive for more than two decades, going all the way back to his days of working with Vivid. This is nothing new for him.

Just curious.
 

Would you explain then why are you just now speaking out publicly?

Just curious.

in other news, Russell Brand is also being charged with rape and sexual assault.

whatever happened to Piere woodman that guy was the GOAT

Laws have to change when it comes to rape allegations. If proven false, then the person who made up the claims should face the same charges and prison time as the rapist, if they were convicted of rape. That would be the only fair solution...because many times people's lives were ruined and then nothing came out of it, the fake victim wasn't charged with anything.

I mean I've been writing about him doing this since the release of the Vivid movie Emperor, which was in 2006. Where the fuck have you been? :P

I still smile thinking about Janine giving that fucker a black eye for poor Tawny Roberts.

You know what? I 100% agree with you.
I've passionately defended women in our industry who claimed to have been assaulted and more than a few times that came back to bite me in the ass.

I truly truly belive that those who lie about this hurt the real victims and as such should 100% have to spend some time in jail for the lie.

I get that sometimes the attacker has bigger lawyers than you and you can't afford to fight your case but in the case where the girl flat out fuckng lies - fuck her. She should have to spend 90 days to 1 year in jail.

There is a recent industry sexual assault that took place 1) in front of a witness and 2) with a fucking video of it and they police declined to press charges as she is a porn star. I feel like a big reason for this is so many girls have been lying.

I like you!

Having been falsely accused and forced to use video evidence to prove me being not guilty of what i was accused of was a horrible experience for me.
Many people, especially women, even after watching the video still treated me horribly.

It is refreshing to read your reply.

Having three daughters, any person that hurts them will pay. However, they better not be lying about what happened.

The bad people / liars really hurt the rest of us.

Thank you for the post.

Just like with Donny, it's always the guys you most expect.

Where there is smoke, there is usually fire as well... as the old adage would say. No one gets accused of things for no reason, and coercion is just another way of committing the offence. It does not make it any less of an offence, it just means that other means were used (i.e. not of violent nature) and that the victim was either manipulated, plied with drugs and/or alcohol, or simply felt too scared to do anything in that moment.

Just like in Masterson's case, there is a reason why the statute of limitations should not apply if there are multiple victims. It proves beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a serial predator, and he deserves to be where he is.

As far as law enforcement goes, anyone that had to deal with law enforcement knows that they couldn't care less about the evidence. Some do, but those coppers are very rare. Most of them want to climb ranks (just remember the Gilgo case) and couldn't care less about justice.

If it's a "whore" she doesn't matter even if there is solid evidence. Fuck, even if she isn't a "whore", chances are that nothing is going to be done. Point in fact: Andrew Tate.

I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss any type of sexual abuse complaints as poppycock unless there is very solid forensic (physical, digital) evidence going back months, but not if it's just the guy's guy excuse: "She's just jealous I found a better one", or "She's just fucked in the head", etc.

All I am trying to say is that the porn industry is rife with predators, and always has been. Prostitutes were always the easiest targets, and when the porn industry started, adult performers were just as easy, if not even easier targets... Why? Because everyone watches porn and looks down on them, and in a way, it's a bias, whether the police and prosecutors realize it or not, but they are most certainly known to have and show bias towards working women and adult performers.

I mean... at the end of the day, that's just my opinion... but if you remember the song that Aileen Wuornos requested to be played at the end of the documentary, from Natalie Merchant, "Carnival":

"Have I been wrong, have I been wise
To shut my eyes and play along
Hypnotized, paralyzed
By what my eyes have found
By what my eyes have seen
What they have seen"

Sometimes... all you can do is play along... but that doesn't mean you shouldn't get justice.

sorry
I read to here and had to reply.
I call BULLSHIT.
"No one gets accused of things for no reason, "

Unless the reason is malicious. My first Ex wife made up shit all the time and finally a judge shut up and let me talk, then allowed me to play records both audio and video.

"NO reason" would only be accurate if the reasoning includes a malicious reason.

I will go back and read the rest now.

It does make less an offence.

If I use my words to get you to do something.

Say purchase my services that is much less an offence they putting gun to your head and taking your money for the same service or using violence to take your money for my service, etc.

Case is not over.
 

The Appellant’s Opening Brief submitted on December 18, 2024, demonstrates two fundamental flaws in Danny Masterson's convictions: (1) the trial was rife with erroneous judicial rulings that skewed the jury’s view of the evidence against him and (2) there was a stunning amount of exculpatory evidence which was never presented to the jury,” it reads.


You speak of justice 'exculpatory evidence' is often not allowed because judge's have made up their mind that the MAN is guilty!

Believe me when I say the opposite is way to often the truth when the woman is just ignored.

It did NOT prove beyond a reasonable doubt or there would not be an appeals process.

Two women getting together to go after a man is not a reason for a judge to ignore the law.

there is NO law that states
"statute of limitations should not apply if there are multiple victims."
Judges DO NOT have the authority to MAKE law. They have been given or should I say they have taken the power.

I do not have an opinion on his guilt, only that the process was NOT followed legally and that the CASE IS NOT OVER.

I am actually working on case where over 6 law enforcement officers assaulted and bettered me, then kidnapped me, then released me to the hospital after they beat my head into the parking lot and left me laying face down in a large puddle of water. All because they did not like the words coming out of my mouth. Words that I will in court were actually accurate to what was going on. Words that will show that the SEVERAL woman that were there, were in fact lying to the FEMALE officer about what was going on. Yes I have video evidence.

'coppers' as you stated, are humans, and like most humans I have met are not very intelligent, have very low consciousness, and suffer from the Dunning Kruger Effect.

If you knew how many attorneys have refused my case. Many of which are TERRIFIED of retribution from the infamous local law enforcement. Several even stated that they would never win another case in this county if they took my case.

To be clear, people that physically do harm to others need justice delivered to them on a cold plate.

I was brought up on 'stick and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me"

I am hoping that people reading this are starting to understand the greater issue.

Communication is difficult enough, but YOU and I will never really know what really happened, when words are involved.

Now, is there physical damage? Did they go to the hospital and the police immediately?
We need to train our children, as I did my three daughters,
someone FN touches you at least come tell me, immediately. Get the proof needed for the prosecutor. Do that immediately.
Don't start crying about how hard that is. Easier today than in ten years.
Being a victim is NOT YOUR FAULT, Minimally as their father I will get justice,
FYI, have a couple times. Don't touch my family. Say what you want but keep your hands off.

Many of the coppers are just tyrants.
I respect the position, but have only found a few in it that deserver respect.

Why are you using this as an example?
They did drop the case, correct?

Because the case confirms the lack of credible evidence or consistency in the accusations?

Meaning it was most likely made up or retaliation.
or what did you type in?

"sexual abuse complaints as poppycock unless there is very solid forensic (physical, digital) evidence going back months, but not if it's just the guy's guy excuse: "She's just jealous I found a better one", or "She's just fucked in the head", etc."

Or how about she just want me to give her money to settle out of court.

I have been here too. This is why I have cameras throughout my office and home, carry multiple hidden recording devices on me at all times, have recorders in my vehicles, etc.

How many times have I been accused like Andrew Tate? Not saying he did not do something wrong. Saying that I have been forced to PROVE my innocence on several occasions. Only my recordings did so.

The world is full of predators. FFS!
Anyone can be an easy target for a seasoned predator.

Words like "everyone" are not great to use.
I do not look down on them. I prefer them to be on top.

People on this forum do not look down on them. No one around ME is allowed to look down on them, except when they are not on top.

Bias is a problem.

What I want to share here is, again, teach your children to speak up, even if just to you.

That and do not put yourself in a position to become a victim. It is easier than you think, especially if you are trained young.

I just wonder how I went through life all these years without such issues, or having to have the house full of CCTV, etc.

Fact that you make note of how the "charges were dropped" (what in the actual fuck?!) against Andrew Tate is enough to tell me that you're not speaking the full account of the events. Andrew Tate ran a multi-national OCG focused on socially engineering women over Instagram, waiting for them in front of universities in expensive cars, and coercing them into the cam business.

Moreover, he now runs multi-national ponzi schemes.


What world do you think he will ever NOT be prosecuted for the things that he has done to yet-to-be-mentally developed young women? Some of which could have been your own daughters.

Yeah, I don't like law enforcement, but that many officers will not tackle you over saying something stupid or even insulting. It just doesn't happen. You would either have to be so drunk, high on drugs, or insubordinate for that to follow... Meaning: you wouldn't follow the instructions.

Regardless of your race and/or ethnicity, you follow their instructions. You do as they say, innocent or not, you do as they say.

Either way, cry me a river, but I don't believe a word that comes out of your mouth, Mr. El Inocente.

False accusers should be given a very public BUKKAKE

What if you have them on film saying one thing, and then saying allegations a month later. What then?

Giving consent on film means absolutely nothing in the eyes of the law, unless there are credible witnesses, and other evidence as well.

If you felt uncomfortable in a situation and wanted to go home, to safety, you would pretend everything was ok and wanted to get it done and over with, and report it when you feel safe enough.

There is one paysite in particular that coerces females into doing things that they do not wish to do, and CCBill is processing for it. How they manage to go through compliance, I do not know. But, I guess that outsourced Serbian support is most definitely not actually checking the videos properly, either.

What I am trying to tell you here is that they did in fact give consent, but whether or not it would stand up in court is something entirely different. If she is clearly not comfortable with doing anal, and you continue pushing, and pushing, and pushing... she is bound to agree at a certain point simply to make it stop.

I am most certainly not trying to be no "captain-save-a-hoe here", I am most certainly a feminist at heart, not disputing that, but it's quite obvious that we are very very far from reading the visual cues from the scenes, and checking for the social cues as well, whether the performer is feeling comfortable or not, if she is being coerced, etc.

Compliance teams in the adult industry are an absolute joke, and the processors are in for another storm with VISA and MC, that's a given. Whether you believe me or not, compliance is a joke, and it's outsourced to brainless idiots.

Rape is rape... be it if it happened to a civilian, a working woman, or an adult performer. It doesn't matter what means were used to do it. It only matters that it happened... and that's what sucks. 'Roided punks, incels, and all-around assholes will always do as they please, regardless of the consequences.

Do you know the definition of coercion?
 

Could not have been my daughters, I taught them better and protect them and keep involved in their lives.
Poor parenting (IMHO) causes them to have these things happen to them.

Officer tackle, assault, batter, etc. and have KILLED people for their words. There is case law on this. It happens on a DAILY basis, in America.
Law enforcement does not have the authority to give orders, except under specific circumstances.
MILLIONS are paid out monthly for POLICE abuse and misconduct.

Freedom of speech violations are become the most popular complaint and law suite against law enforcement.
YouTube is full of CONFIRMED violent actions by law enforcement. Watch a few channels, by ATTORNEYs that follows up with the court documents showing the settlement and court rulings and even criminal charges against law enforcement.
Many Law enforcement personnel being charged and going to prison, for MURDER!

Get your facts straight.

I am not required to follow instructions by a law enforcement unless certain criteria is met. PERIOD.
Learn the law.

I have cameras up, because of people like you. Either don't know the law or don't care about the law and just do whatever you think is okay.

These recording have kept me OUT of court, had charges MADE UP by law enforcement dropped, won me several civil cases and many of my criminal cases. The only criminal case I did not win because I bet the hell out the guy that was attacking and stalking my wife and then 6 and 9 year old daughter. Why did I beat the hell out of him? Because and yes I recorded it, because law enforcement refused to do anything about his stalking and attacks.

He had a warrant for his arrest and the police station was across the street from where I found him and they REFUSED to come across the street and arrest him. I hospitalized him. After the judge heard my story and watched a few videos and listened to some recordings, I was given one year probation and a $650 fine. Then he scolded the officers for bring me in at all and NOT doing their job correctly. He said "Had you performed your duties, MR. (my name redacted) would not have been forced to defend his family in this manner."

Law enforcement, in my experience rarely know the law, much less obey the law and certainly do not enforce the law.
People, in my experience rarely know the law, thus they can not obey the law.
FYI, I am a lawyer.

Again, in my experience, most law enforcement is either incompetent or tyrants.

Only idiots just do what the police say. They are NOT on your side. Their (corporate) job is to raise money through fines and imprisonment. That is how they are trained.

I come from a family with several law enforcement people and they often talk about and confirm what I am saying, In Fact, they are the reason I learned much of this at an early age.

Them and my attorney tell me, Do not speak to the police, do not answer questions, do not comply with any orders, except ID and only ID if they have articulated a CRIME that they believe you have committed. do you even know the LEGAL definition of a crime? Then call your attorney to deal with the police. Even in traffic stops.
I have helped convict a police officer for planting evidence while he was performing an illegal search of a vehicle. Luckily for the young girl, he also groped, this happened on MY business property under one of my many cameras.
Did not keep the office from assaulting her and molesting her, but at least the truth came out. Still some how through his contacts he had the case is sealed. He then moved to another county and got another law enforcement job. Where his behavior continued.

Do not give out legal advice like "do what you are told", that is NOT in anyone's best interest.

Follow the law, not word of some under educated, none supervised tyrant.

Do not comply until your ATTORNEY tells you to.

I think I agree with most of this.

shit communication issues coming out online.
 

I used to wonder how I get myself into these situations when people like you never get into them.

I know this, I met my last wife after our neighbors woke me to go save her from two attackers in our apartment complex parking lot.
Why did they get me and not the police. they do not trust the police and I was there and available. People know that I am a great person, willing to help others, intelligent, know how to deescalate and I am dangerous, both mentally and physically.

I stand up to people and for people and that makes me a target.

I do a LOT of business, have been an entrepreneur since I was 13. 11 if you count mowing lawns.

Initially I did not record things. It seemed that if two or more people stated something true or not then the 'judges' acted like it was a democracy and ruled against me.
After a few business issues and court battles with the first wife (yes I won them.) I started recording everything I could.
If I am in the right, I need to be able to prove it.

Judges believing women over me, because they were women, PERIOD.
The court battle with my first wife is no precedent and is taught in law school. Why? because I used recordings to prove to the judge that she had been lying to the judge.
The judge still not hold her in contempt or punish her in anyway, and they certainly did me, when that woman lied about what I allegedly doing.

Most people say I should keep my mouth shut, but I have been given the ability to defend others and myself and I use it often and to my own detriment too often.

I have had my ass beat on many occasions, but the person that could not defend themselves, that I was protecting, DID NOT.

Most of the local law enforcement KNOW ME and do not mess with me because they KNOW I am recording them and because they know there is NO need to.

You seem like you might only be one of those people that only stand up for your beliefs when you can do it from the safety of YOUR computer.

That is why it does not happen to you. PEOPLE know you will be of NO help!
Just guessing. I do not know you. I hope I am wrong and this is just my shit communication issues coming out online.

psiphon and vpngate are free.

and.

Why didn't she go from the set to a police station or burly boyfriend.

At the time?

Because it's better to wait a bit to get a better media coverage.
I am waiting for a witch hunt, the witches being the feminists.
I can't wait that they get cancelled.
They are usurping democracy.
Who voted for them ?
Oh wait people had rather Einstein Trump instead.
This is how popular they are...
Now France received a charter of gender studies "intellectuals" coming from the USA.

No tariffs on export, for those

I am a woman, and I also think that the current legal system overprotects women, so some people take advantage of these loopholes to make profits.

Cheers! I actually have ipVanish, so I could read it eventually.

Just seemed weird that a 'News Site' would be blocked in the UK?

Maybe some of the MI guys adMIre chinar.

Can't even get wikipedia there.

In west coast cities it’s like a criminal gang. The very top of the political spectrum is an adult woman claiming to be a victim of harassment or assault on herself or accusations against the father of their child. Women have the privilege of losing in a custody case and then out of the blue they “discover” or “have the courage ” to tell their story about how the father diddled one of the kids. Amazing how there only “have the courage” or discover this when they are going through a custody case and need more leverage. Happens all the time and it destroys kids. 9 out of 10 people are pure garbage if your litmus test is how they view child custody cases especially flimsy accusations that come out of the blue. Both simps and feminists are cruel pieces of shit for doing this to kids. Look up that case in Minnesota where a mom coached her kids to report abuse and then she hid the two girls for several years. Now she is in prison but the kids still had their lives destroyed

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5ArrO0Xi3b0

Our resident incel POS, VikingMan just can't stop himself from spewing verbal diarrhea... "oy vey, male rights!" ... I don't know, man. Maybe it has something to do with the fact that trauma and PTSD are real things, and it takes time to heal and garner courage to stand up against the abusers? Men, for the most part, are pieces of shit, it's just statistics.

Females are submissive by nature, and it's not like it takes a fucking genius to understand that it's not going to be as simple as... Oh yeah, I just got raped... BRB, going to go to the police and file a report.

Dumb fuck.

I don't believe I've met a more retarded fuck on this board.

You think abusing children is perfectly fine. That’s where I draw the line and speak out fear of the consequences because I’m not gonna stand around and allow people to continue to abuse children for the sake of their deranged ideologies. You don’t even know the definition of incell. That somebody who can’t get laid. Get your insults in order.

We’re supposed to be a nation of laws and that means if you bring an allegation forward, there needs to be evidence before somebody gets their kids taken away or they are charged with a crime. However, the way it is right now the accusation is the evidence. Enjoy your shit world it’s gonna get a lot worse before it gets better.
What you are left with is a lot of guys like me who have voided their social contract with society. I encourage all people with basic human decency and head on their shoulders to start looking out for number one and only care about your friends and family. All the other scumbags can sit and rot as far as I’m concerned. Stranded on the side of the road in a snow storm? Not my problem! Getting beat up by your scumbag boyfriend outside a bar? Not my problem! Can’t afford food? Not my problem!

It’s very common for people from all backgrounds to give black men a tough time. I happen to know of one black man who has children and he became a massage therapist to pay the bills. A female massage therapist at his clinic, made an accusation against another massage therapist that he violated her during a massage. The black guy I am speaking of “simped out” and let himself get suckered into giving her a massage a few months later. She then promptly to the police that this guy violated her as well. So he loses his job, has a protection order against him, and has to deal with criminal charges. The woman was in court with her scumbag victim advocate and a box of tissues for dramatic effect. As soon as she walked out of the courtroom she was all smiles.
There’s no shortage of deranged women on all sorts of psychotropic drugs. They get treated like heroes for “having courage”. Then they make money off of lawsuits. Lather rinse repeat.

And if you see nothing wrong with women, all of a sudden, discovering that the father of the children is abusing the kids at the same point she is losing a custody case then I really have nothing else to say it’s very apparent to anybody with an IQ above room temp that you have serious issues. Don’t Worry, you have a lot of company.

You’re a sack of shit. Burn in hell. Yeah the false accuser was white. Like I said the pecking order starts with women. They are number one. They take precedence over Black people. White liberals are the biggest pieces of shit on the planet, and they are the most racist. Malcolm X was right.

Teach people to do what is need immedietely not when it benefits them financially.
 

I have court documents to prove the following.

My ex lost custody and did this to me. (remember this is why I record so much.)
When they, finally, got my daughter before the judge. Alone with her attorney and mine, a female, my daughter told the judge that HER MOTHER made her say that I touched her.
That I had NOT touched her. That it was to get her mother custody and child support again.
Case was ended immediately and I retained custody.
My daughter had to change schools as her mother also filed a report with the school.
The school did NOT care if the report was false and started limiting my access to the school. A private school lost 3 students that day. 4 when/if you include my unborn son.

Your are the dumb fuck. Initiating being insulting proves that your are a dumb fuck.

You just perpetuate the excuse of NOT going immediately to the rape report people, hospital or police. PTSD is not instant.

Sure it is hard, but the lesson is TEACH PEOPLE TO DO WHAT IS NEED IMMEDIETELY NOT WHEN IT BENEFITS THEM FINANCIALLY.


statistics - men are NOT what you state - statistically.
If so, I challenge you to prove it.

Be warry about challenging me with statistics. Statistics are a big part of my life.

Statistics have proven that domestica abuse is more prevalent in ..
never mind.. HERE.


According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS) (2010, updated in later reports),
IPV rates vary across populations:

Heterosexual women: 35% report experiencing rape, physical violence, and/or stalking by an intimate partner in their lifetime.
Heterosexual men: 29% report similar experiences.
Lesbian women: 43.8% report IPV, with higher rates of physical violence and psychological abuse.
Gay men: 26% report IPV, slightly lower than heterosexual men.
Bisexual women: 61.1% report IPV, the highest among groups studied.
Bisexual men: 37.3% report IPV, higher than gay or heterosexual men



Why is men on men violence/gay men the lowest??

Because men no better to fuck with men. Men will kick your ass if you fuck with them.

Why heterosexual women the third lowest? women that spend time with men, learn quick not to fuck with MEN.


Lesbian women, the highest, I wonder why. they still figuring out, that violence is not the answer.


Look at how high bisexual women is. WOW! Seems that woman on woman violence, statistically is the highest.
your statement
" Men, for the most part, are pieces of shit, it's just statistics."
Has been debunked as women, statistically are the most violent towards women and almost as violent toward men. We all know men are not reporting as much as women , We also know men are to filing false reports like women. that means the statistics for women abusing men is actually much higher.

Do not misinterpret peacefulness for submission.
 

Females are NOT submissive by nature.

In my experience, having three daughter, they are not submissive at ALL.
My last wife was, but that was taught to her.
My first wife sure as FUCK was not submissive and neither are her two sisters.

A very small sample of the women I dated were submissive, but then I can not stand a submissive personality, much less a submissive women.

Submission is learned. Sure being peaceful and loving is more a woman's trait and men tend to move toward violence to solve issues.

Do not misinterpret peacefulness for submission.

Of course, these statistics do not take into account unreported instances.

Only those that have complained and managed to secure an investigation.

The stigma attached to SA is huge, no matter your race, age, gender or sexual orientation.

Oh and TBF, you're coming off like a complete incel with your responses.

Incel, seriously.
a member of an online community of young men who consider themselves unable to attract women sexually, typically associated with views that are hostile toward women and men who are sexually active.



LOL!
First I am not young.
Second, not hostile. At least not my intent.
Third, I have 4 children and as my oldest two daughter like to say "that I know of". Because I chose to share my poor behavior as a young man with my daughter to warn them off from young men, like I was. Before I learned different.
I dated more women (and probably bedded more woman) than most men will ever ask out. All I need to do is go out and I can get a date. (Certainly when the gold diggers find me.)

You infer what ever you like.
I am at a place in my life that SEX is not my primary goal or ambition.
Getting old I am.
Tired of the BS, that comes with dealing with the under informed public.
Finding a woman that is not a narcissist is very difficult.
Not saying women are narcissist, just saying, I must be talking to the wrong women, still.

Not sure about investigations being secured as a requirement for the statistical data.


Otherwise I agree.
Yes! stigma is out of control.
Still waiting until you can financial benefit to use that as motivation to report does not go well to proving the case.

Since we have been able to record, the number of false allegations that have been proven have grown exponentially.

Take the number of lawsuits again the police, since we started recording them and them using body cams, as an example of how reality is starting to be easier to prove with recordings. Also, dashcams.

Heck, Take the people damaging Teslas, that have 360 cameras as an example.

“Incel” is the go-to insult that the NPC crowd has been programmed to use to shut down any debate. Men are protectors but more and more of them are simply checking out of their natural roles. And NPCs have it twisted thinking men who want justice are “guys who can’t find women”.

One of the more shocking examples of “men checking out” is of a truck driver who saw a toddler walking down the street and his first thought was to jump out and help. However he was worried about any false accusations so he just minded his own business. The child ended up drowning after falling into a fountain. Why would he not help? How about the Good Samaritan who helped a woman with her car and she dreamed up a false allegation against him which led to his arrest and losing custody of his child before video was discovered and exonerated him. Simps and feminists instantly think the worst of any a man and any jury is also going to be dominated by NPC droids. Theway I see we make a point is to just separate from these dirtbags as much as possible. Record everything including your phone conversations. Use dash cams front and back and record audio. The courts are corrupt but video evidence and audio evidence (when there is a sign warning audio is being recorded) is still effective in shutting down false accusations. Cops are also notoriously biased and are mostly simps with the average IQ of about 90 so always tell them your respect them the moment you come into contact with them and remain calm while you show them your evidence. They almost always are biased wanting to arrest a man in any situation involving a woman.

I recently had to deal with a psycho woman and man in a business for over one year and every interaction was via text or recorded calls. Now I can show future customers that these people were desperate to continue to do business with me when they eventually slander me. Texts are better because you don’t have to pay for them to be transcribed for court. I buy new phone every few months and set perfectly good IPhones aside just to preserve evidence.

Now Shannon Sharpe is getting accused. Regardless of the truth he will be financially affected and people will always wonder about him for the rest of his life. If there were real consequences for false and flimsy accusations AND consequences for attorneys and prosecutors for entertaining these accusations then things would change fast. Do you think Casey Anthony dreamt up that sexual abuse accusation against her father on her own or do you think her fleabag Attorney Jose Baez encouraged her to dream it up? Amazing how those allegations came out at the exact moment she needed sympathy from the jury. Happens all the time. False accusations are a lucrative industry for attorneys and other people in the court system like therapists and psychologists.

Should be the video:

https://noodlemagazine.com/watch/-152298533_456240948

Nothing special except sucking feet and rimming, she looks quite eager and happy doing it.

Imo just another late career chick in decline without jobs trying to get attention and money.

A reason to avoid working with Western models.

Stats based on self reporting are useless in a society of people who love to victimize themselves.

How can one even stalking and rape sum up together? It's two totally different things.

is that the "consent video" though? I dunno obvs, just asking as it didn't include any discussion of acts to be performed. there was one part of the vid where the actress def did look hella uncomfortable; the portion where he kept spitting in her mouth. I'd throw up if someone did that, which I get is illogical as deep kissing exchanges saliva as well, but to me there is a huge difference. I'm getting the icks just thinking about it

at the beginning (but after the clap to start) he said he liked 'nasty girls' who spit in his mouth, but there was nothing about him returning the, uh, favour

that's not rape though, so who knows what actually transpired. the only way it makes sense is if the "consent video" is another piece of footage. the OP's article is woefully short on facts so understandably it leaves the situ open to a lot of interpretation based on peeps personal histories and pre-existing biases

oh well, at least this thread is an interesting series of diary entries

people who love to victimize themselves. true true
 

It is all the data I have.
I know more that did not report than did.

I know that people need to report and that is kinda the point.

At least realize who the reporters are.. WOMEN on WOMEN!

I am against most of this.
 

Back when I automated my tube sites, I also built in functionality to remove all videos with certain words, like rape.

This is the best video I could find, easily and quickly, to prove a point to many women and a few men.

https://youtube.com/shorts/FR4ZnC7ow...zDEZ2Qaw6T7rnW


Too many women lie about what really happened because their feelings were hurt.
I have experienced this, too many times. To the point I record all my interactions, including private ones.

The me too movement set women way back in being treated with respect and protected by society.

Watch the video to know why?

Understanding the Harvey Weinstein Case: Two Extremes and the Middle Ground
The Harvey Weinstein case is one of the most polarizing and high-profile legal battles in recent history. With over 80 women accusing him of sexual misconduct, ranging from harassment to rape, Weinstein became the face of the #MeToo movement. He was convicted in both New York and Los Angeles, but his case remains controversial. This post explores two extreme perspectives on the case and suggests that the truth likely lies somewhere in the middle.


Extreme 1: Weinstein is a Monster
On one side, Weinstein is portrayed as a predator who abused his power in Hollywood for decades. Here’s why:

Over 80 Accusers: The sheer number of women who came forward paints a picture of systemic abuse.
Detailed Testimonies: In court, several women provided graphic accounts of their encounters, some of which were corroborated by medical evidence (e.g., descriptions of Weinstein’s physical abnormalities due to surgery).
Convictions: Weinstein was found guilty in both New York (2020) and Los Angeles (2022), with sentences totaling decades in prison.
Cultural Impact: The #MeToo movement used his case to highlight widespread sexual misconduct in the entertainment industry, framing him as a symbol of unchecked power.

In this view, Weinstein is a clear-cut villain, and the legal system finally delivered justice.


Extreme 2: Weinstein Was Framed
On the other side, some argue that Weinstein was unfairly targeted, and the case against him was flawed. Here’s why:

Questions of Credibility: Critics suggest that some early accusations were dismissed because the women couldn’t accurately describe Weinstein’s physical characteristics (due to his surgery), raising doubts about their claims.
Media Bias: The #MeToo frenzy led to a “guilty until proven innocent” narrative, with the media amplifying every accusation without always verifying the facts.
Lack of Physical Evidence: Despite the number of accusers, no definitive physical evidence (like DNA) was presented in court. Convictions relied heavily on testimony and circumstantial evidence.
Potential Coordination: With so many accusers, it’s possible that some exaggerated or fabricated claims, especially in a climate where public opinion had already condemned Weinstein.

In this view, Weinstein may have engaged in questionable behavior, but the full extent of the accusations might be overblown or even orchestrated.


The Middle Ground: A Nuanced Truth
The reality likely falls between these two extremes:

Power Abuse is Real: Weinstein probably did abuse his position, as the volume of similar accusations and some corroborated details suggest a pattern of misconduct.
But Doubts Remain: The absence of hard evidence, the media’s rush to judgment, and the possibility of false or exaggerated claims muddy the waters. High-profile cases like this can attract opportunists or lead to groupthink.
Complexity of Justice: Weinstein’s convictions are significant, but his New York conviction was overturned in 2024 due to procedural errors, showing that even the legal process wasn’t flawless.

The truth may be that Weinstein is guilty of some serious wrongdoing, but not necessarily every accusation leveled against him. The case highlights the difficulty of untangling fact from narrative in the court of public opinion.


Conclusion
The Weinstein case isn’t black and white. It’s a reminder that in high-profile trials, especially those fueled by cultural movements, the truth can get lost in the noise. By understanding both extremes, we can better appreciate the complexity of justice—and why it’s crucial to look beyond headlines.

Share your thoughts: Where do you think the truth lies?