GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Onlyfans and models posting content they shot with studio (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1383594)

fris 04-25-2025 03:30 PM

Onlyfans and models posting content they shot with studio
 
I’ve seen a couple people charging (unlock) for content they shot for studio for example madi collins posting her kink.com shoot as hers

I would think this would not be allowed?

CaptainHowdy 04-25-2025 04:11 PM

Snitches don't get the bitches :small-smi . . .

nikki99 04-25-2025 04:56 PM

Not allowed

blackmonsters 04-25-2025 06:16 PM

Wow, a model did like every other asshole who pirated their content.
I'm so outraged that I don't give a shit.

:2 cents:

2MuchMark 04-25-2025 06:36 PM

Just taking an oh, I dunno, wild guess here, but the content shot by Kink, is owned by Kink, not her. Basic copyright violation 101 here...

blackmonsters 04-25-2025 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 2MuchMark (Post 23366937)
Basic copyright violation 101 here...

Yes, standard operating procedure on the internet is occurring.

:1orglaugh

CyberHustler 04-25-2025 07:51 PM

The middleman's last stand?

ANAL PASTE 04-25-2025 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CyberHustler (Post 23366948)
The middleman's last stand?

Kink is the owner, not amiddleman.

Victor-E 04-26-2025 01:04 AM

Not allowed unless they did a colab or content exchange, which is usually done by individual shooters and not big studios. Easy way to tell is to see if the watermark is there or altered or edited out. Although I've read you can completely remove or fake watermarks now with AI editors.

CurrentlySober 04-26-2025 02:39 AM

A tale as old as time - I remember back in the early 2000s that the girls would purchase 'talent copies' of the DVDs that came out with them in, to sell to fans etc - The scenes they appeared in would almost always come across my desk to be uploaded to their sites. The bigger the name, the more scenes shot and uploaded. I'm sure the studios turned a blind eye back then though - They didn't think the internet thing would ever catch on, so were not worried! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

fris 04-26-2025 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ANAL PASTE (Post 23366984)
Kink is the owner, not amiddleman.

please she removed the watermark too

AmeliaG 04-26-2025 07:42 PM

As a producer, when this happens, you can DMCA the platform, you can simply never book that person again, you can book that person only for trade in the future, or you can just shrug and ignore it. If they are a really big star, who would have deep enough pockets to be worth suing, you can get in a legal scuffle with them, and have random fans sending you annoying emails for the next year, even if you win monetarily.

Having a lot of attorneys in my family, I feel qualified to say that there is not much you can do about it that is worth doing. (I am not an attorney; this is not legal advice.)

Stuff like this discourages a lot of producers from producing.

Is anyone, including Kink, making bank from their content these days?

ANAL PASTE 04-27-2025 05:40 PM

I gave up on chaturbate long ago. Rebills are enough for trip to Mexico 🇲🇽

Wautier 04-27-2025 06:00 PM

It's illegal, but does anyone give a shit? Go to ThePornDude.com, and find hundreds of sites with illegally shared scenes... will anyone do anything? Likely not... haha

Hustlers gonna hustle.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc