GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Would someone figure out how to answer this fuck's question?

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Would someone figure out how to answer this fuck's question? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=149548)

jact	07-03-2003 06:30 PM

Would someone figure out how to answer this fuck's question?

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
fluff & fodder ...
answer the question or be "nailed" or "pinned" ...

Are you telling me that a sex education website should not have ANY nude graphics of a minor ...

not even the SINGLE GRAPHIC which creates all this attention?

YES or NO?

Posted in http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showth...hreadid=149249

Christ, how fucking stupid can someone be?

theWatsonian

07-03-2003 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jact

Christ, how fucking stupid can someone be?

Apparently very stupid.

FATPad

07-03-2003 06:31 PM

There is no answer this guy will like. He steals CP pics and posts them on his site so he can call himself "dad" while showing hardcore porn to kids.

You really think this guy will listen to anything anyone says?

jact	07-03-2003 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FATPad
There is no answer this guy will like. He steals CP pics and posts them on his site so he can call himself "dad" while showing hardcore porn to kids.

You really think this guy will listen to anything anyone says?

I wish to fuck that the authorities didn't drag their heels in situtations where children were in danger.

jact	07-03-2003 06:34 PM

For anyone not following...

Quote:

Originally posted by sexeducation
NO - I will not - unless I get a formal request to do so.

Sorry - but SexEducation.com contains a SINGLE - ONE - JUST ONE - graphic of a nude minor ... by herself - without any sexual interaction of a partner or other ...

Yes - it is disturbing - it is meant to be that way ...
Like many of my other essays are meant to be.

And the attention that one single essay gets ...
fufills it's purpose ...

A minor can not contract to sell their sexual likeness until they are an adult.

You can NOT contract away her constitional rights by having a parent sign. It's NOT their right. It's her rights.

Bye bye "teenage art" website ...bye bye ..

roflmao

keyDet79

07-03-2003 06:35 PM

I guess graphics/drawings are ok (hell I have them in my encyclopedia) but there's a thin line between what a person can jack off to and not.

Oh btw, that's for a sex education website. I didn't bother reading that post about his site.

Tipsy

07-03-2003 06:35 PM

Of course it also most certainly isn't a 'sex education website' (whatever that is). A mess - yes. A site apparently trying to taget minors to supply hardcore porn to them - yes. A pedo magnet - yes. Sex education - certainly not.

Ice	07-03-2003 06:39 PM

nude + minor = child porn

wonder if he is friends with Lawrence Conner

sapphiresky9

07-03-2003 06:51 PM

NO

NOT friends with Lawrence Connor.

BAD.

No.

Not friends.

Not with Lawrence Connor.

I buy all my underwear at K-Mart.

I am an excellent driver!

Uh-Oh... - 10 minutes to Wopner....

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:09 AM.