How much bandwidth per 100,000 hits???
 

I have a gallery with 16 pics burning aprox 35 gigs for 100,000 uniques....too much...too little....or is it Goldylocks....just right....

I know you guys have this info at your fingertips....any insite will be most appriciated....

thanks,

three bandwidths

27.2 gigs on average. :2 cents:

images 16X100k=1600k
main+thumbs=100k

100k*1700k=170,000k=170M

about 170MB?

100,000 visitors. Most will not be clicking every single picture, and by the way odds are you have at least 32 pictures and not 16, even more if you count in banners or graphics.

35 gigs of bandwidth, seems a tad high but not gunna do the math.

Just add up all the pictures k, all the thumbs k, all the graphics k, and the index.html's k. Post the total or a damn link.

I think around 350k total or so on a gallery with 16 full size pics, etc should be about on target. Did not break out the calculator just rough guess.

The main question is simple, is it making you more than your spending?

That would be 170GB according to your math.

Oh well... it's been a few years since I've actually had to think... :1orglaugh

:)

you have only 16 pics and you brunt 35gigs (that a shit load of BW)for a simple gallery

WTF?
what size are your images

Gallery can be less or more bandwidth consuming. I do not deal much with surfers, but as far as I know from TGP posters who buy content from me, 20 pics gallery without heavy design eats approx 1 Gig per 5000 visitors. That means 30Gigs for 150K visitors.

So I'd say 35Gigs for 16 pics gallery is a bit over normal. Though may be there is a heavy design, or too big thumbs, or too attractive so that surfers click more often (it's known that surfers click much more on thumbs with closeups of pussy, penetration, blowjob etc.)

we can see that! :1orglaugh

btw dude...you are getting hotlinked!!!

Maybe your full pics are too big .. I have galleries with 20 thumbs burning 27 GB / 100.000 visitors