Supreme Court hears online porn case
 

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp...us_online_porn

:mad: if you type "free porn" on a search engine, obviously you will find listings about that subject, what kind of moronic excuse is that?

Bush reminds me of a deer caught in headlights...dumbass

They show soft core porn on the cable channels, go after them too then.

There is a valid case for "the protection of children", however this has been going on for years when several reasonable options could have been instigated to at least partially resolve the issue, - they were not.

Sad news is, it is election year again in the US and the hyprocacy rises once more.

When it gets to the level of outcrys over Jackson's tits - it's just too absurd - they are just tits - not uncommon! There are far more relevant issues to be dealing with than sanitizing US television still further.

Whatever the outcome of the Supreme Court, the fact remains that the US is not the net and I seriously doubt anyone will bother to observe some law of the US which may end up as some coverup of tits.

Although the majority of websites respect and adhere to section 2557, (only my opinion, but is a valid law), this is not obligatory for any webmaster not hosting in the US. I can't see anyone giving a shit about further restrictions under US law.

The problem with your country is that you can sue everyone for everything. What ever happened with your own/your parents responsibility?