GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Sponsor Performance For May 2004 (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=305503)

BlueFly 06-01-2004 03:57 PM

Sponsor Performance For May 2004
 
CHECK IT OUT!

feedback is always welcome!

EviLGuY 06-01-2004 03:58 PM

Is this the new thing? Everyone puts up a sponsor ratio site? :)

cali_22 06-01-2004 03:58 PM

cool

llabtaem 06-01-2004 04:00 PM

Sexy Payouts 4506 0:4506 .000

OUCH! :mad:

Jason 06-01-2004 04:00 PM

Cool.. will these convert your traffic?

http://porndollar.com/3/sites.html

BlueFly 06-01-2004 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by EviLGuY
Is this the new thing? Everyone puts up a sponsor ratio site? :)
I guess so... I have posted this since November. (and get flamed evey time! lol)

JSA Matt 06-01-2004 04:08 PM

I bet I can get that ratio under 1:323 if you send more traffic :winkwink:

:glugglug

JSA Matt 06-01-2004 04:09 PM

How is Porno Pay Check 1:578 with only 426 sent?

charmed 06-01-2004 04:10 PM

You really should try Pimproll...surprised it isn't on that list.

BlueFly 06-01-2004 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JSA Matt
How is Porno Pay Check 1:578 with only 426 sent?
oops. fixed that one.

BlueFly 06-01-2004 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by JSA Matt
I bet I can get that ratio under 1:323 if you send more traffic :winkwink:

:glugglug

I would like to, but I don't have a demand for much that you have to offer (mainly public flash)

wdsguy 06-01-2004 05:08 PM

awesome info

m00d 06-01-2004 05:11 PM

:thumbsup

BlueFly 06-02-2004 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by wdsguy
awesome info
Thanks. Some people like it, and some people don't.

Manowar 06-02-2004 02:47 AM

Some nice ratios, and some very poor ratios

DarkJedi 06-02-2004 02:55 AM

Wow, is Mafia Bucks still around ?

BlueFly 06-02-2004 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DarkJedi
Wow, is Mafia Bucks still around ?
I don't send too much their way, but it is a pretty reliable sponsor. The checks come on time!

BlueFly 06-02-2004 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Manowar
Some nice ratios, and some very poor ratios
Yeah, some of these really suck ass. Apple Cash has really improved... if you can believe it. The conversion ratio sucks, but retention is looking pretty good.

EviLGuY 06-02-2004 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueFly
I guess so... I have posted this since November. (and get flamed evey time! lol)
I'm not flaming you.. just seems to be a bunch of them lately. :)

GammaCash_Dom 06-02-2004 08:35 AM

cool stats.....but where is Braincash? loll
Mr.North is still waiting :Graucho

BlueFly 06-02-2004 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by EviLGuY
I'm not flaming you.. just seems to be a bunch of them lately. :)
I think it's a good thing. Full disclosure... If everyone posts there numbers, people would know sponsors were full of shit when they say they convert blind traffic better than 1:50 and pay $50 per signup. Some sponsors really do well. Others don't.

jayeff 06-02-2004 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by BlueFly
I think it's a good thing. Full disclosure...
Basically agree with you, but lots of problems. For example, you have Silvercash on your list and they have a ton of sites. I doubt you are sending to all. So your results speak less for Silvercash than for the specific site(s) you are promoting. But we don't know which they are.

The method of promotion is another of a long list of variables. You write your own text links, use stock banners, or...? We have all experienced lousy results with sponsors other people swear by (even allowing for suspected hype and special deals) and vice versa. There is also the reality that when ratios are even as low as 1:100 (never mind the poorer ratios that are common), sales are going to cluster and that makes for unreliable stats on anything but huge numbers.

I know you recognize all this, because I have followed your other threads. So these comments are about the broader issue, not a criticism of what you are doing (except that I would question whether earnings per click is as useful a figure as earnings per impression).

I don't think a meaningful assessment of sponsor values is really possible unless hundreds of webmasters contributed to a single database (even then per site stats, rather than per sponsor, would be more relevant). If someone managed that, the fluctuations due to webmasters' individual methods would start to even out. Otherwise, if there were dozens of lists like yours, seeing who consistently appeared as good or bad could be useful.

Royal Cash 06-02-2004 10:22 AM

great stats
thanx

i will be glad if you can test us too :)

emmanuelle 06-02-2004 10:31 AM

Nice list- I was just introduced to some new sponsors.

Need2Know 06-02-2004 10:34 AM

Great Stats !

I think that they'll help a bit to make a decision when choosing a Sponsor for almost all of us... :thumbsup

Hue G. Pness 06-02-2004 10:36 AM

Nice list and stats. Might want to try giving Porn DvD Dollars a go as you can send traffic to individual movie download sites or to the main page. With all the DVD length movie downloads offered to the surfer ratios can be amazing. Plus the free hosted movie gallery list is kick ass and growing all the time. Check them out Porn DVD Dollars

BlueFly 06-02-2004 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff
Basically agree with you, but lots of problems. For example, you have Silvercash on your list and they have a ton of sites. I doubt you are sending to all. So your results speak less for Silvercash than for the specific site(s) you are promoting. But we don't know which they are.

The method of promotion is another of a long list of variables. You write your own text links, use stock banners, or...? We have all experienced lousy results with sponsors other people swear by (even allowing for suspected hype and special deals) and vice versa. There is also the reality that when ratios are even as low as 1:100 (never mind the poorer ratios that are common), sales are going to cluster and that makes for unreliable stats on anything but huge numbers.

I know you recognize all this, because I have followed your other threads. So these comments are about the broader issue, not a criticism of what you are doing (except that I would question whether earnings per click is as useful a figure as earnings per impression).

I don't think a meaningful assessment of sponsor values is really possible unless hundreds of webmasters contributed to a single database (even then per site stats, rather than per sponsor, would be more relevant). If someone managed that, the fluctuations due to webmasters' individual methods would start to even out. Otherwise, if there were dozens of lists like yours, seeing who consistently appeared as good or bad could be useful.

You are right on the money! I agree totally. Normally, when I post this info, people say,"hey, I have that same ratio!" Now that more people are posting this, I think we will start seeing patterns.

Hardcore J 06-02-2004 10:42 AM

Stupid Cash needs to be on that list!

hjnet 06-02-2004 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by jayeff
Basically agree with you, but lots of problems. For example, you have Silvercash on your list and they have a ton of sites. I doubt you are sending to all. So your results speak less for Silvercash than for the specific site(s) you are promoting. But we don't know which they are.

The method of promotion is another of a long list of variables. You write your own text links, use stock banners, or...? We have all experienced lousy results with sponsors other people swear by (even allowing for suspected hype and special deals) and vice versa. There is also the reality that when ratios are even as low as 1:100 (never mind the poorer ratios that are common), sales are going to cluster and that makes for unreliable stats on anything but huge numbers.

I know you recognize all this, because I have followed your other threads. So these comments are about the broader issue, not a criticism of what you are doing (except that I would question whether earnings per click is as useful a figure as earnings per impression).

I don't think a meaningful assessment of sponsor values is really possible unless hundreds of webmasters contributed to a single database (even then per site stats, rather than per sponsor, would be more relevant). If someone managed that, the fluctuations due to webmasters' individual methods would start to even out. Otherwise, if there were dozens of lists like yours, seeing who consistently appeared as good or bad could be useful.

Just look at my sig :)

BlueFly 06-02-2004 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hardcore J
Stupid Cash needs to be on that list!
It will be next month! I just started sending traffic, and didn't rack up enough to make this list.

BlueFly 06-02-2004 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Need2Know
Great Stats !

I think that they'll help a bit to make a decision when choosing a Sponsor for almost all of us... :thumbsup

Glad to help out!

O MARINA 06-02-2004 01:45 PM

BlueFLy
have a look at www.sexsearch.com
a new dating affiliate program that should be on your list

:)

Edguy! 06-02-2004 01:51 PM

cool :)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123