Michael Moore in Gay Porn Video!! (PIC!)
 

First off, let me say I LOVE Michael Moore.
I loved his new movie.

But when trying to think about what to write in this week's FLASHCA$H newsletter, I was drawing a blank.

Then I starting thinking about how about half the threads this week were about Michael Moore's Movie.

Then I started thinking about the name "Michael Moore."

And how it would be a great porn name.

And welll....


http://fluffersmut.citizensex.com/fl...s/moorebig.jpg

:) The accompanying text and the rest of the newsletter will be sent out to affiliates on Friday.

Now thats fucking funny!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

how much for the content? i think that site is going to make a killing. :thumbsup

oh






my







god




:1orglaugh

hehehe :1orglaugh

OMG WTF LOL :1orglaugh

Don't care if Michael Moore is homo or not. I enjoyed the movie, but he has more of a bias than even Rush. Too many lies and bending of the facts in the DOCUMENTARY. Plus they were lies to make a point. There is enough truth around to make a case aginst Bush. He hurts his cause to distort the facts. Esp, when I can notice them as I watch the movie.

In a movie, you can make anything up. In a DOCUMENTARY, the idea is to show the facts.

Like your cover, send it to him. If he has a sense of humor, he'll enjoy it. Juicy would.

That is so wrong, on so many levels, that I can't help loving it.

Yowza!

you recon he has seen his own pic.

:1orglaugh

Haha

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

There are 50+ threads to discuss the film and michael moore. Lets not make this another one, okay? Just a moment of levity? Please?

thats funny dude:thumbsup

Ahhh...that's fuckin hilarious....:thumbsup

:1orglaugh

heh. I feel bad.
But parody is the most sincere form of flattery, right?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

This guy is so sexy

:1orglaugh Har Har :thumbsup

I sent Moore a link 2 this tread.

nice one:1orglaugh

I hope that's a joke. I have MASSIVE respect for M. Moore.

M. Moore in a gay porn movie.. never in a thousand years lol :Graucho

hehehe :1orglaugh

Wrong! That is a right wing talking point, not the truth.

The right wing is trying to redefine what a documentary is. Here are long accepted definitions from the film industry:

"Documentary is the creative treatment of actuality."
-- John Grierson, Cinema Quarterly 22.1, 8.

"Documentary defines not subject or style, but approach. ... Documentary approach to cinema differs from that of story-film not in its disregard for craftsmanship, but in the purpose to which that craftsmanship is put."
--Paul Rotha, Cinema Quarterly, 2.2, 78.

"A non-fiction text using 'actuality' footage, which may include the live recording of events and relevant research materials (i.e. interviews, statistics, etc.). This kind of text is uually informed by a particular point of view, and seeks to address a particular social issue which is related to and potentially affects the audience."
--Paul Wells, "The Documentary Form: Personal and Social 'Realities,'" An Introduction to Film Studies, 2nd ed., ed. Jill Nelmes, 212.

"[A]ny film practice that has as its subject persons, events, or situations that exist outside the film in the real world."
--Steve Blandford, Barry Keith Grant, and Jim Hillier, The Film Studies Dictionary, 73.

"A nonfiction film. Documentaries are usually shot on location, use actual persons rather than actors, and focus thematically on historical, scientific, social, or environmental subjects. Their principle purpose is to enlighten, inform, educate, persuade, and provide insight into the world in which we live."
--Frank Beaver, Dictionary of Film Terms, 119.

"A nonfiction film about real events and people, often avoiding traditional narrative structures."
--Timothy Corrigan, A Short Guide to Writing About Film, 4th ed., 206.

"Film of actual events; the events are documented with the real people involved, not with actors."
--Ralph S. Singleton and James A. Conrad, Filmmaker's Dictionary, 2nd ed., 94.

"A documentary film purports to present factual information about the world outside the film."
--David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson, Film Art: An Introduction, 5th ed., 42.

"A film or video presentation of actual events using the real people involved and not actors."
--John W. Cones, Film Finance and Distribution, 154.

"A type of film marked by its interpretative handling of realistic subjects and backgrounds. Sometimes the term is applied widely to include films that appear more realistic than conventional commercial pictures; at other times, so narrowly that only films with a narration track and a background of real life are so categorized."
--Edmund F. Penney, Facts on File Film and Broadcast Terms, 73.

"A term with a wide latitude of meaning, basically used to refer to any film or program not wholly fictional in nature."
--James Monaco, The Dictionary of New Media, 94.

"A film that deals directly with fact and not fiction, that tries to convey reality as it is instead of some fictional version of reality. These films are concerned with actual people, places, events, or activities."
--Ira Konigsberg, The Complete Film Dictionary, 2nd ed., 103.

"Unlike most fiction films, documentaries deal with facts--real people, places, and events rather than invented ones. Documentarists believe that they're not creating a world so much as reporting on the one that already exists."
--Louis Giannetti, Understanding Movies<, 7th ed., 339.

"A nonfiction film that organizes and presents factual materials to make a point."
--Gerald Mast and Bruce F. Kawin, A Short History of the Movies, 7th ed., 646.

http://www.docftv.com/definitions/

Moore's movie is the definition of a documentary.

Don't believe the right wing talking points.

when a Comedian makes a documentary it is to be funny
not a real history lesson silly
He is a Comedian not Jesus himself

btw, if you are a FLASHCA$H affiliate, the Toolkit newsletter went out today and should be in your inbox.

hey hun,
when u get a chance hit me up on icq please! thanx-a-bunch!

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup