GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   An Interview With Voice Media's Attorney (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=343449)

Deepundercover 08-19-2004 03:39 PM

An Interview With Voice Media's Attorney
 
Ira Rothken.

www.lukeisback.com

"What's your reaction to this week's ruling?"

"That ruling was a motion that the CE Cash defendants brought for the court to give it guidance on what it should do with the revenue share arising out of the contract between CE Cash and New Destiny [Homegrown Video]. The court said that it didn't think it was necessary for the defendants [Voice Media, Ron Levi, et al] to deposit the money with JAMS [the abitrator]. That it could make its own election on what it wants to do with the monies."

"So it wasn't a devastating setback for your side?"

"It was a benign ruling that maintained the status quo. We were trying to be creative because we wanted to show good faith. Normally in a case like this one, where the plaintiff (New Destiny) is claiming there is no contract, it's rather unusual for them to walk into court and argue that they want to be paid under a contract. We were asking the arbitrator for some guidance and he gave us the guidance. He didn't think setting up a fund was necessary. There was no time when we wanted to keep monies from New Destiny. We were dealing with a moving target and we were seeking guidance from the arbitrator."

pornstar2pac 08-19-2004 03:40 PM

that's it 2 questions?


cmon Luke, we need to fill a 20min. spot

Far-L 08-19-2004 04:03 PM

"it's rather unusual for them to walk into court and argue that they want to be paid under a contract"


Does anyone else see the irony of this?

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Methodcash Rick 08-19-2004 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Far-L
"it's rather unusual for them to walk into court and argue that they want to be paid under a contract"


Does anyone else see the irony of this?

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

When taken out of context, yes..

WHen read in the full context, no..

"Normally in a case like this one, where the plaintiff (New Destiny) is claiming there is no contract, it's rather unusual for them to walk into court and argue that they want to be paid under a contract."

Far-L 08-19-2004 04:14 PM

Ummm... We never claimed that there was no contract... just that we never made a contract with whatever company they sold CE to....

Read the court docs presented by both sides then you will have a much clearer picture of the issues.

Methodcash Rick 08-19-2004 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Far-L
Ummm... We never claimed that there was no contract... just that we never made a contract with whatever company they sold CE to....

Read the court docs presented by both sides then you will have a much clearer picture of the issues.

My mistake, I was only commenting on the context of the statement.. At the time of the post, I hadn't read more than what was posted.. :)

Far-L 08-19-2004 04:53 PM

NP. Totally understand.

Spin is a very hard thing to reconcile either way.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123