Election results by average IQ!
 

check this out.... :glugglug

http://www.nielsbuus.dk/rod/2004election_by_iq.png

bs

I believe it.

Georgia: 92.

good to know im slightly ahead at 145. maybe thats why I feel like im surrounded by idiots sometimes.

looks good to me.

or maybe it's just utter bullshit

thats a possibility also. do you live in georgia?

That can make a nice shirt! :winkwink:

even with the fancy graphics, and the election results applied... it's still a hoax...

they just used the IQ numbers from 2000 and added this years results to them....

here are the 2000 ones (bottom of this page) :

http://americanassembler.com/feature...e_averages.htm

me smartner

this is nothing not already widely known on every college campus. Conservatives absolutely rely on easily confused, impressionable people as their main voting base. Remember David Duke?

Does this surprise anyone?

Nope...well, I thought Alabama would be last.

doh?! :upsidedow :upsidedow :upsidedow

nonsense

That info is a given but thanks for the chart which displays this fact very nicely.

no

I suspect the list is absolutely correct. I think the list reflects the education of the citizenry rather than actual native intelligence. Your typical IQ test does rely on a certain education level. I know that if I were to apply myself more in math I could score even higher than my usual 140-145 range.

It's a hoax
http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/C39/P10/

http://www.sq.4mg.com/IQstates.htm

Jesus people, it's just a joke. You people are idiots. Like any state in the USA has an average IQ of 85. That's borderline retarded. Say what you will about people from Mississippi, but they're not retarded.

enough already... it's over

I live in a state full of morons. Good thing none of my family is from here, I was born in California.

IQ tests are stupid and inaccurate. I would LIKE to believe they are accurate as I was a gate child and am a member of Mensa.

Remember, however, that there is no question on a standard IQ test (there IS NO standard IQ test in actuality) that can gauge the type of intelligence someone needs to be a top notch farmer. IQ tests are very poor indicators of mental profiency and I believe that those numbers are to be questioned. While a recognized journal is cited as the source, no date is given. This is unusual.


Next off:
Higher population areas are generally more socially liberal. Areas of lesser density are generally less socially liberal. Areas with higher density have more workers and therefore more executives and higher management and higher learning for that matter.

This data, even should it prove correct can mean several things, ALL of which are moot in light of Kerry conceding the election.

For all you "he cheated" freaks.

Do you believe that Bush could have cheated to the point where noone could ever find out HOW he cheated?

If not, doesn't it make sense that Kerry, knowing a lot more than your sorry ass, would have disputed the results?

Kerry lost. FAIRLY. Next time vote more.