fahrenheit 9/11 vs fahrenhype 9/11
 

fahrenheit 9/11 vs fahrenhype 9/11
if u've seen'em both please tell me what u thought... if not... se them... both.


my opinion: ok michael moore a lying, truth bending sob but do the creators of fahrenhype realy expect us to believe that the US simply attacked Iraq to liberate the iraqy ppl and to lessen the terrorist threat? in that case what about north korea that actually has nukes... what about osama that is still running free... (just a thought)... against north korea the only thing they are doing is leading sanctions = nothing compared to iraq.
(ofcourse it had to do with oil)

and the part where they say in fahrenhype 9/11 that their recruiting is all about ppl wanting to be in the military... please! what a fucking lie. they join up cause it will help them with college... if you look at the statistics the majority of the ppl joining is ppl who cant afford a college education without the help of the military. wars have allways been faught by the lower classes in a society and they allways will...

Farenhype also says that it wasnt bush who wanted to build the pipeline... who fucking cares except the ppl in the US. all parties in america wants stronger controll of the oil not just the republicans.

they say why would we go to war for oil if we are against the arabs and for israel? maybee to install a USA friendly government in that country = more oil for the USA... just a thought

the world is a better place without saddam... and without saddam the iraqy ppl will be more free. and if the price of that is that the US will get further controll of the oil then so be it. the world needs a superpower (if we dont have one then someone is going to fight to claim that position (read history)) and im glad that its USA... (lesser of two evils)

fahrenhype 9/11 ? never heard of it.

bush shot a missle through the pentagon. :2 cents:

there were explosives in the trade center towersl. :2 cents:
Hint: thats why they fell like a professional demolished building using explosives. Much like when they destroy a casino. :2 cents: :2 cents:

If we went to Iraq for the oil, we would have gotten SOME of it after 1.5 years of occupation. So where's the oil? We haven't seen a freakin drop of it. Why is that? Because the whole "we invaded for the oil" is old and dried up. That shit started during the first gulf war, it didn't hold any water then and it doesn't now. It's good sounding rhetoric though.

Most people who join say it's for the educational benefits, but less then 10% of them actually use those benefits at all, let alone to the completion of a college degree, that's probably less then 5%. Why do you think the GI Bill gives a 10/1 return on money invested? Because there are at least 9 other servicemen who won't use their benefits at all. Most of the people in the military couldn't get a job anywhere else, and didn't want to go to school. So they enlisted. How do I know? I did 4, and am now actually using my GI Bill, unlike most other enlistees.

Further, if one signs up for a job for the benefits, they aren't allowed to bitch about doing the job they signed up for. Why do you think the military offers so many benefits? Not everyone relishes the idea of running off to be shot at, especially not for crappy pay and no benefits.

You're kidding, right?

Pentagon

As far as the WTC collapsing the way it did, that's common in skyscraper architecture. Skyscrapers are designed to collapse telescopically, it makes demolition easier and minimizes damage should it unexpectedly collapse for whatever reason.