The people allowing their underage daughters to be models for non-nude paysites
 

Who are they? Where do they come from? And, most importantly, what the hell are they thinking?

Whenever I encounter those <18 non-nude teen sites, that is what bothers me most... some parent has allowed it to happen, has probably even signed some contract so that their underage daughter could serve as jack-off material for men from all over the world.

Some people shouldn't be allowed to reproduce :2 cents:

Daddy is making the site, duh

I agree with you on this punkworld - it's a sick sick world we live in...

Anyone can become a parent - yet there's tons and tons of screening required to adopt a dog/cat from the animal shelter. Go figure. You gotta feel bad for those kids and just hope that this is the only abuse that they are suffering. Those parents should be slapped.

Fortunately karma is always out there - ready to kick dumbasses like this in the butt. :thumbsup

Oprah had one such sick fucking family on her show once.. even oprah was having a hard time swallowing the ingnorance and sheer sickness that sat on her stage beside her...by the middle of the show she had the little girl move ont he other side of her away from her mom and "uncle".. the mastermind behind the whole deal.

sad

i think your judging way overboard.. they can be models for magazine and teen things.. people have to make a living if a guy or some kids gonna jerk off to a girl he can just imagine her..

i dont understand whats so wrong with 18< non nude sites?

I have been approached by at least five girls, 13-17, who want to be these kinds of models. I have been sent links to sites, as examples, that make me pretty uncomfortable.

I won't touch a model under 18, for anything, since I shoot porn.

But I can say the girls that hit me up, know exactly what they are doing, what they want, and in many cases, their parents don't know what their daughter is up to.

daddddyyy

they're thinking...ooh she'll make a ton of money and we can quit our jobs to manage her career!
that's what the 3rd party always thinks.

Yeah, those kind of sites should no be allowed at all !

sad sad world we live in when parents let there children be used like that

Yeah, it's pretty fucking disgusting if you ask me.

I am sure the type of parent is also the ones that get their child heavily involved in those beauty pageants. You know, the ones where the 5 year olds wear a ton of makeup..7 year olds that wear outfits no 7 year old should ever wear.

My theory? Fame association. They aren't famouse, but if they can get their kid famous...they feel important themselves. Such a shame.

i wouldnt for near that.

Because nn is very broad, if a 14 y.o is in lingerie in suggestive poses for grown men to jerk off too is cp to me.

I saw that one.

i completely agree. that shit makes me fuck sick to my stomach. seriously, some of the most disgusting shit i've ever seen - and yet it is some how praised by so many of these sideways freaks.

those sites are plain wrong, and need to be shut down

give me a break...those sites are for nothing other than for people with pedo leanings to jerk off without going to jail.

You've hit the nail right on the head there.

I've noticed a growing trend with webcam girls - the kind that have a personal blog site of their own, not the 18+ XXX pay per minute chat models - to offer private $$$ sets or even full blown members areas. These are girls who are 15 or 16. They're smart because they know how to code HTML and manage a site, and they're smart because they know how to play the guys that return to their site day after day. :upsidedow

I doubt most of their parents know what they do.

That is just so wrong. Some people shouldn't be allowe to breed.....

what's going on in this world....

what a bunch of sick fucks in the world..

Who cares? Child nude/non-nude photography has been around since the invention of the camera your not gonna change it now.. Stfu your overwound collective asses about it.

I dont think that is a very good idea.

i remember that one, that family was SICK! :Oh crap

Yeah, not sure I see the difference between your typical NN site and a Delia's catalogue or Teen Magazine. It's exactly the same type of thing. :2 cents:

:disgust

fucking wrong wrong wrong

Keywords: non nude and models it's not illegal so I dont see anything wrong with it who cares what other people do it's not you. Their just trying to make money like everybody else! :2 cents:

It isn't the same thing at all. Intention and purpose can and do make a huge difference. Pictures made for the purpose of showing articles of clothing or presenting "cool" images to people of the same age are something completely different than pictures intended as masturbation material for pedophiles. Saying that there is no difference between the two is like saying that there is no difference between a child running around naked on the beach and a child running naked through the basement of a pedophile.


As for the girls playing a large part in it themselves, ofcourse that's true. However, the parents are responsible for bringing the children up, and if they do this, some things have obviously gone wrong. Not only that, parents are also supposed to keep their children in line and keep an eye on what they do. If your 13-year-old daughter has her very own semi-porn site, you've clearly fucked up as a parent.

fucked up, i dont know what the fuck is wrong with parents and where they lose the thought of protecting their children