![]() |
Which linux version should I install?
I need one that has good graphics platform and it's compatible with most devices
:pimp thanks |
Definitely Redhat.
|
Fedora is pretty good for 3D and ease of use, redhat is pretty good too.
|
debian :)
|
be a man and get OSX
|
SUSE is pretty friendly right out of the box.
|
fedora seems good start :)
4 CD's damn |
of course redhat, it supports most of the modern devices
|
Debian!!
Libranet 2.8.1 is debian based distro! I have it, it rocks :) |
Is it your first Linux distro? If so, use Mandrake or Redhat, they are easy for noobs. Otherwise, Free BSD.
|
yes, first
well almost,i installed suse some years ago but didnt spend any time on it. |
Quote:
|
We run Debian 3.0/3.1 and Redhat ES 3.1 in our production environment and both are very stable. I can't speak to their graphical capabilities though.
|
thanks guys,i decided to start with red hat since their site has a big number of tutorials and guides. With some reading shouldn't be that hard :)
|
Quote:
|
Like vladimir said - OSX all the way.
Failing that FreeBSD for rock solid OS. For ease of use, go with RedHat/Fedora (Redhat is no longer supported -> taken on by Fedora) |
My vote goes to Debian.
|
i would suggest freebsd, but if you must go with linux install Gentoo
|
Borked, just noticed it; so Fedora. If things go well i'll switch everything to linux. Shame I don't have any experience on it.
|
I like Slackware myself, OSX would be better as a graphics/ design platform (FreeBSD + ease of use + photoshop & dreamweaver natively).
|
Debian
I'd recommend staying away from an rpm based distro... |
Why would you do that?
|
Basically for learning and as a change from the boring XP. I wouldn't mind higher security and a faster environment.
|
Quote:
Hrm. Well have fun then. |
Fedora Core 2.
I bought a book called Red Hat Fedora 2 Unleashed. Linux is cool. |
thanks
Equinox gives me a month till i quit lol |
we ran debian at our old work, very good package manager, dselect. havent tried fedora or gentoo. i am strictly bsd person. redhat out of the box is asking for a knightmare. it was about 15 exploitable holes. so it wouldnt even be safe to put it on the net on the default install. slackware is more a bsd type feel to it the way the files re laid out. a lot of people like slack. up to you.
|
if you want a dogshit simple linux desktop type thing, and don't feel like becoming the ultimate install guru...spend a couple bucks on either linspire.com or xandros.com's versions...
I have the linspire (was lindows.com at the time, version 4) and it was a BREEZE to install...tons of shit is already setup for you, it's just basically a commercialized version of debian + kde... xandros is what I'm going to try next as it has already built in a copy of either wine or some other app that allows linux to run a few windows progs... |
I agree Linspire for home use or mac if you can afford mac, but mac is actually freebsd if it matters.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:39 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123