Afghanistan : MISSION ACCOMPLISHED !
 

:1orglaugh
Another great accomplishment of this " freedom" administration....

So after invading to remove the ex-friends talibans, now the troops will stay to work like in Columbia: WAR ON DRUG !!!

On the other hand, George managed to control two major raw materials he needs:

OIL in Iraq, Drugs in Afghanistan .... Watch out if you produce a lot of alcohol ... your next.

I think Gold & diamonds producers are next

American's are so frightened of everything... drugs? Give me a break, drugs don't shoot people... Illegal cartels shoot people. You think they spend time worrying about drugs in the Netherlands? And they're way better off in terms of gang violence.

Those cartels would be out of business, and we'd be that one step closer to true freedom if drugs were legalized.

how stupid

It's not really a "problem" per say for the US. The United States loves being at war with something, the war on drugs is just another excuse to fuck people up the ass and invade civil rights. If they didn't have the "war on drugs" to waste money on, social services might actually improve, and we can't have happy citizens on our hands.

umm dont forget his tariffs on metals coming in and out of the south.

he has tried to make limits and profits off almost every thing america has its hands in.

http://www.laborresearch.org/story.php?id=289

I am over all this usa bullshit...

Time to move lol

Jon

Please stop. This is not the board for common sense and realism. :Oh crap

YOu guys didn't get the memo. Its not a good week to be a democrat and discuss the middle east.

Most democrats have decided this is the week to talk about Social security.

You shouldn't stand at midfield and point to the scoreboard when you are behind.

I do think a sig. should be placed here!

drugs fun the people with the guns, now you have something to worry about!

So George Bush was alone in Afghanistan. I could be wrong, but I could have sworn Canada thought Afghanistan would be a good idea too. In fact, aren't there Canadian troops fighting there?

Spin .....

Canadian troops are in Kabul, under NATO . The main block of troops are US, hunting ( LOL ) for Bin Laden ...

But if it makes you feel better, it is Canadian's fault. The election too ... The so-called liberation of women too ... It's all under Canadian control...

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

This too is really Canadian....

I'm just pointing out that Nato is in fact there participating. I guess somebody else other than George Bush thought it would be a good idea. I guess they were watching Fox News too much, right?

Read carefully the article and try to concentrate...

Were is it said that the " idea ' was not good ???? Or you think it wasn't ???

I said:

Accomplishment are normally done after ... In other words, to keep it simple for the simple minds :

" The bush admin fucked it up, from his puppet installed president to the overwhelming power of the warlords"...

Don't you ever learn anything??? The warlords of today are the ennemies of tomorrow ( re: Bin Laden, Saddam)...

Anyway, I don't have time to educate you.

thank fuck you aren't in charge of any major decision making

You couldn't sound more misinformed if you tried.

Wrong...and he has proven it multiple times.

This coming from someone who thinks quoting Denis Miller makes you look good in a political argument.

Very developped post ... and to the point ....
Do not develop your toughts more, you could blind everybody...

BTW, you should see a shrink, could help. :2 cents:
Seriously.

I think Belgium may have beat them to the punch
(See: Africa)
:thumbsup

back at you

Are you kidding me? That's been monopolized forever..

george sure knows what he is doing :disgust

I love it. Once again democrats have positioned themselves for failure. Why should they change their 30+ year strategy?

Get everyone in the world against anything the U.S. does in the middle east. Register new votes based on the fact.


Now, anything good comes out of the situation, they are left looking like fools.

Look, now we know why they were after Bin Laden. He was fucking up the flow of smack coming out of Afghanistan. Now that he's on the lam they can push as much dope as they want.

Don't take a rocket scientist to figure that one out.

The American people aren't going to notice because they're too busy watching news stories where some famous black guy gets crucified over some sex/crime scandal. It's been back to back since OJ Simpson.

Long as you keep America's attention on the 'evil black men' then you won't get them noticing the rug being pulled out from under them.

Michael Jackson is up now for crucifying. When he's done they'll find another black guy. If they can't they'll find some spanish guy.

This is actualy very overrated because most of the world's opium still comes from Afganistan...you got to tell something to the sheep I guess...

No, but he's a lucky SOB and things usually turn out OK anyway despite him :upsidedow

More Evil Black Men Getting Recent Headlines:

Robert Blake
Scott Peterson
Martha Stewart
...

Thats the kind of thinking that credits Jimmy Carter will the fall of the Soviet Union.

:thumbsup

Nope you are wrong.


they are freedom fighters :1orglaugh

their GDP was completely driven by heroin BEFORE the US went to Afghanistan. You can't stop that overnight and expect people to support the changes happening. Funny thing about all you idiots is that you did not object to that before... you did not object to women being beaten in the streets, object to no school for girls, object to a rutheless theocracy gunning down people for fun in the streets, object to them harboring Osama BEFORE 9/11, object to countless terrorist training camps and so on... and now that there is hope, a new democratic government, schooling, medicine and health care for everyone and billions of dollars in aid from the international community and a complete rebuilding of the infrastructure to bring Afghanistan into the modern age... you want to bitch as if it is some kind of failure.

there is a reason that you backwards hippies dont rule the world.
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Agree 100%

Yea, the felon dan rather said we can call Iraq a success until every house has electricity.

What the dumbass doesn't tell you is that they have more electicity now than they did before we stopped the production capacity in their mass graves.


And Dan Rather is one of the leaders of the dumicrats!

if some of these people could just say "i hate bush" i would respect that. but making stupid, shortsighted, misinformed and completely wrong statements as some sort of weakminded attempt to rationalize their feelings is really annoying to me for some reason. i shouldn't be annoyed... but i am. its like someone insisting that 2+2=5 and trying to argue that point, just because they hate math... when all they have to do is say they hate math.

Afghanistan has been a drug producing state for what? The past twenty or thirty years? It's their main crop. It's not gonna change over night.

Before the election, the democratic party encouraged people to post this type of stuff on message boards. It was one of their failed strategies.

They would even give them the articles to post with the title they should make.

Apparently some of the "operatives" didn't know they were supposed to stop after the election. Oh well, they didn't pick their brightest superstars perform the task.

First, Afghanistan, under the Talibans, didn't produce heroin ... check your facts...

Secondly, where you objectig to these acts ... Till 9/11, I didn't hear much about this coming from the US.... Did you present a motion at the UN at the time ??? A big Fucking NO


Bush was entertaining the Talibans... Let's not forget that they were the " freedom fighters " against Russia, financed by the US....
Let's not also forget of the pipeline negociations ....

So your reply, as well as those of your crotch grabbing buddies. are pointless and just illustrate the level of ignorance that is cultivated in the US of A....

If you could follow through with your thoughts, you would realize that your theories suggest that Bill Clinton's policies are the reason we were attacked on 9/11.


thanks for coming!

If you wanbt to bring Clinton in absolutely, as all good right winger, at least develop your toughts ...
Or STFU.

Your the liberal idiot that wants mouthfart politics all over a business forum. At least you should know how your smelly theories would conclude if you had the intelligence to see them through.


The only logical conclusion your theory would have is that Clinton pissed them off and caused them to attack us.

Lets go further, according to your theories, the republicans are cleaning up the liberal mess. Again!


Stupid fucking idiot.

Well we helped Afghanistan free itself from the commies and we got the Taliban. So does this surprise anyone? Can't wait to see what happens with this "free" Iraq. There's an old saying about "good" intentions.

Maybe we should take about 8 years and do nothing about the organization that declared war on us.

Certainly, they will never bring that war to the U.S. soil. I'm sure that the rich leaders of the middle eastern countries will stop them and not create an environment to reward our enimies.

It could happen.

Stupid name calling are you only way out.... and you resort to it quite often not to say always....
I posted an article about Heroin in Afghanistan, not an article about the democrats, or Clinton, or Carter or whoever ... Stay Focussed !

"Business board " ... you must be kidding .... here is a " business thread " :

http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=439692

When I want serious answers, I go somewhere else ...
When I want to piss off " so-called" businessman, I come here ...

Now, go take a cold shower ... and stop broadcasting your idioty for all to see...

And BTW, I ordered the AMD ... not that you really care :321GFY

Are you retarded? Seriously. Are you so up Buhs's ass you can't see straight. And no I'm not a dem or a lib. I'm an independant that use to be a republican, so lick my balls.

Anyways you obviously don't understand the CONTEXT of what I am saying. If you took off your bised colored galsses you'd see that. You think if we had not helped supply the Afghans in their fight with the commies there would have been a 9-11? Um no. Because they'd still be fighting the commies for several more years than they did and their anger would be towards Russia.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh OUCH !!

oh my god. you are so clueless. you are trying to say that it all happened in a vacuum overnight? Afghanistan has always been a major drug supplier to the world dealing primarily in hash and heroin. trade routes, farms, know how, developed markets? it all just happened after the first bomb was dropped? How do you think the Taliban funded itself and its war?

Jesus you are a fucking moron. You can argue that the sun has not risen for the last 500 years all you want. it does not make it so or change the facts.

The Taliban were VERY moderate until they took control and turned to more radical islam and became so extreme. Originally, they were a student political movement for change. The radical stance only happened after they took control of the country. Sorry to keep dissapointing you with facts.