GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - (pic) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=456788)

http://bestsexpost.com/weed.jpg

19 and 21 years old .. I knew what you were thinkin :1orglaugh
Good night all :pimp

Why do people post pics of child pornography on here? Attention, I guess.

:ugone2far

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turboface

Why do people post pics of child pornography on here? Attention, I guess.

:ugone2far

Read what I wrote fuck head 19 and 21 years old..

oh noes. now the police will come get me.

looks like child porn....:(

Quote:

In the United States, child pornography is prohibited under both federal and state laws with some state laws including more or less restrictive definitions compared with federal law. Under federal law, child pornography is defined as visual depiction of minors (i.e. under 18) engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals.

Questions arose during the 1990s as to whether depictions of mere nudity of minors - such as those found in some nudist magazines and videos - were legal under federal child porn laws. A court case in 1999 determined that mere nudity involving minors does not come under the federal definition of child porn, nor does it necessarily qualify as obscene, as the Supreme Court had ruled previously that mere nudity in and of itself does not constitute obscenity. This ruling does not specifically address state laws, which may differ. For example, broader definitions in some states have created controversy when parents were arrested for taking photographs in which their small children were depicted nude during usual daily activities, such as bathing.

. . . . . .

Quote:

Originally Posted by spideriux

not child :)

Says the man from Lithuania..

:disgust

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phill

Quote:

A court case in 1999 determined that mere nudity involving minors does not come under the federal definition of child porn, nor does it necessarily qualify as obscene, as the Supreme Court had ruled previously that mere nudity in and of itself does not constitute obscenity.

Did not know that, thanks.

j-

No nudity really: you can't see anything. And besides they're just sitting.

you Have To Post In This Size Patrick So That Everybody On Gfy Will Read It Because Some Only Look At The Pics And Oversee The Text Written Under It