GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   This thumb is 2257 compliant? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=472518)

Paraskass 05-25-2005 10:16 PM

This thumb is 2257 compliant?
 
if I had no docs for this pic, could I be checked? In the bigger pic, the girl is doing nothing sexual, and she still has her top on.

http://www.africanvagina.com/nastydo...ndbrown/85.jpg

if you think not, how so and why?

sixxxthsense 05-25-2005 10:17 PM

thats an odd shaped thumb 125x188 WTFCK???? where? how?

fireorange 05-25-2005 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixxxthsense
thats an odd shaped thumb 125x188 WTFCK???? where? how?

:1orglaugh

Paraskass 05-25-2005 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sixxxthsense
thats an odd shaped thumb 125x188 WTFCK???? where? how?

i shape my thumbs that way.

is there a problem with that?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Paraskass 05-25-2005 10:22 PM

36 fucking views, and nobody can give me an answer or an opinion.

damn, are the new regs that unclear.

DateDoc 05-25-2005 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paraskass
36 fucking views, and nobody can give me an answer or an opinion.

damn, are the new regs that unclear.

It is a human being but she is not depicted in a sexual act. Would I show it after 6/23? Probably not but by then I'll be all text links.

Lycanthrope 05-25-2005 10:26 PM

um, what is a compliant thumb?

If your question is, "would that thumb qualify for exemption?", the answer is *probably* no.

RadiantX 05-25-2005 10:28 PM

If you can see genitals its not compliant. That is one small bikini and thats one huge cooter. :1orglaugh

Paraskass 05-25-2005 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RadiantX
If you can see genitals its not compliant. That is one small bikini and thats one huge cooter. :1orglaugh

I can't see genitals.

not any more than I can see genitals in some sports-illustraded swimsuit pics, or in some Sears bra pics.

Barefootsies 05-26-2005 05:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paraskass
if I had no docs for this pic, could I be checked? In the bigger pic, the girl is doing nothing sexual, and she still has her top on.

http://www.africanvagina.com/nastydo...ndbrown/85.jpg

if you think not, how so and why?

Attorney perhaps?

:disgust

chadglni 05-26-2005 05:17 AM

As Stalone would say...

"Don't leave it up to the judges".

sumphatpimp 05-26-2005 05:36 AM

you didn't read 2256.
so you don't know if it qualifies for a 2257.
why should we do your work for you?

RawAlex 05-26-2005 05:50 AM

It is a sexual display of genitals. You don't have to be naked to be sexual. Anyway, I can see lips an other areas that would get you arrested for showing in public, so the answer should be obvious.

My suggestion: Don't get cute, don't try to split hairs on this one. fly straight for a while, wait for someone else to eat shit to see what type of shit sandwiches they are giving out.

Alex

TheLegacy 05-26-2005 06:22 AM

so your trusting your companies future to a chatboard? christ man - so you hear everyone say, "its good dont worry" so you dont. then you get shut down and end up in court and look at the judge and say, "scoobie doo from gfy said I could use the pictures, so whats wrong?"

get yourself a friggin lawyer who knows 2257 regulations or call the free speech people (sign up with them) and stop looking for answers on a chat board from armchair lawyers !!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123