Quote:
Originally Posted by emmanuelle
Since US webmasters will all be promoting sites with softcore content, or images from the same handful of content brokers; webmasters from outside of the US will be making mad sales off all the explicit content that Americans are unable or unwilling to use.
|
Mmmm... well yea! As soon as any country closes it's doors and restricts content, others will fill a void.
To take that a step further, if the US DOJ then decide they wish to block such foreign sites, they are welcome. From that stage we enter a different world which involves international trading agreements blah... Certainly, other countries will have a response and this is complicated by the whole nature of the net.
On the non-US server market.. there are too many countries to choose from and seriously doubt there will be any long term price lifting for hosting. But, on the other hand, - I know a few US hosting companies who have just lost or are going to lose several customers.
On jurisdiction.. foreign (and US webmasters) need to market their product to the whole net and are not going to quibble about where the market is. Foreign servers will be marketing to the US as well as all other countries and the DOJ is free to block these websites as a response.
This recent introduction of an "upgraded" USC 2257 is not the start of changes in the adult biz on the net. It started when the US government decided to permit the terms of VISA US - terms which no other country agreed with. From that time there already has been the start of a shift of adult businesses out of US jurisdiction to more favorable locations.
The revamped USC 2257 is now the second stage where business will be leaving US territory.
Bottom line? There is nada point in operating a business in an unfavorable environment. Any corp or individual who does not have either citizenship links or servers within the US has complete freedom of choice.
For US folks - they have a severe problem. Tho this depends on whether the DOJ actually heeds USC 2257 since they have, - not once, - ever instigated any action under this code to protect children. That is kinda damning when ya look at it. That aside, it is now more of an imposition on US webmasters to comply with this legislation. Another factor being that once laws are enacted, they are difficult to have removed, - so, unless hearings start shortly to set precedents under this code, - US webmasters will be stuck with the baggage forever.