GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   How are they selling .XXX domains (the premium ones) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=476923)

Platinum Dave 06-05-2005 09:10 AM

How are they selling .XXX domains (the premium ones)
 
sex.xxx
blowjob.xxx
hardcore.xxx

etc.

anyone know yet what exactly is going to be the process?

polish_aristocrat 06-05-2005 09:14 AM

No idea but I predict I gonna get adult.xxx and then Lensman will be mad and he will ban me from GFY





j/k :winkwink:

Quickdraw 06-05-2005 09:16 AM

With all the under the table type deals going on, you can bet they won't be 'up for grabs'

Basic_man 06-05-2005 09:17 AM

I already registred blowjob.xxx :P

Terry 06-05-2005 09:19 AM

new.net is already selling them and icann will soon allow for them by the looks of at.. which means there will be doubles .. yes 2 adult.com's for example. One registered with new.net and one through an icann registry. New.net is trying apparently trying hard to make their domains be the official ones by having them added to icann.
I took this from the new.net site:

9. What will happen if ICANN releases a domain name extension that is identical to a New.net domain name?
We are working very hard to achieve universal resolvability of New.net domain names through a combination of ISP relationships and plug-in downloads. At the same time, we are reaching out to ICANN and its supporters to get them to understand the viability of our names and our approach and to get ICANN to add our names to the "root" servers that they operate. Should ICANN decide to introduce a domain name extension in conflict with one of our extensions and assign it to another registry, they will in fact introduce a "collision" in the name space, something they have professed wanting to avoid. If that were to happen, individual consumers and ISPs would have to choose between the ICANN version and the New.net version of the name. It is our intention to demonstrate a massive market acceptance of our names that will prevent such collisions from being introduced.

So it can go 2 ways... imagine having to choose???!!!

174,661,619 New.net enabled Internet users worldwide*

* New.net domain names are accessible by persons that use one of our partner ISPs to access the Internet or who activate their browsers. This number is limited now, but growing daily.

Uhhh thats a lot of surfers to lose!!!

Slick 06-05-2005 09:21 AM

I think that this is gonna be a total cluster fuck because some people that have had their domains for YEARS are gonna end up losing them because you just know there's gonna be a pile of assholes out there just picking up everything. Imagine getting thehun.xxx :)

I think that it should be set up where the .com owners get first dibs on the domains, but that'd be a fair way to do it which would never happen.

vvq 06-05-2005 09:23 AM

new.net domains are not real. they never will be.

polish_aristocrat 06-05-2005 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Terry
new.net is already selling them and icann will soon allow for them by the looks of at.. which means there will be doubles .. yes 2 adult.com's for example. One registered with new.net and one through an icann registry. New.net is trying apparently trying hard to make their domains be the official ones by having them added to icann.
I took this from the new.net site:

9. What will happen if ICANN releases a domain name extension that is identical to a New.net domain name?
We are working very hard to achieve universal resolvability of New.net domain names through a combination of ISP relationships and plug-in downloads. At the same time, we are reaching out to ICANN and its supporters to get them to understand the viability of our names and our approach and to get ICANN to add our names to the "root" servers that they operate. Should ICANN decide to introduce a domain name extension in conflict with one of our extensions and assign it to another registry, they will in fact introduce a "collision" in the name space, something they have professed wanting to avoid. If that were to happen, individual consumers and ISPs would have to choose between the ICANN version and the New.net version of the name. It is our intention to demonstrate a massive market acceptance of our names that will prevent such collisions from being introduced.

So it can go 2 ways... imagine having to choose???!!!

174,661,619 New.net enabled Internet users worldwide*

* New.net domain names are accessible by persons that use one of our partner ISPs to access the Internet or who activate their browsers. This number is limited now, but growing daily.

Uhhh thats a lot of surfers to lose!!!

sounds like some fucked up bullshit :Oh crap

Platinum Dave 06-05-2005 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slick
I think that this is gonna be a total cluster fuck because some people that have had their domains for YEARS are gonna end up losing them because you just know there's gonna be a pile of assholes out there just picking up everything. Imagine getting thehun.xxx :)

I think that it should be set up where the .com owners get first dibs on the domains, but that'd be a fair way to do it which would never happen.


I should 100% be where the .com owners get first crack at their own respective .XXX domain.

Platinum Dave 06-05-2005 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvq
new.net domains are not real. they never will be.

Which registery you think will win the complete rights to sell them then?

xclusive 06-05-2005 09:26 AM

new.net is pretty much a scam they are not nor will they be certified

Platinum Dave 06-05-2005 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xclusive
new.net is pretty much a scam they are not nor will they be certified

How the hell are they allowed to accept money to register a .XXX domain then?

Quickdraw 06-05-2005 09:32 AM

ICANN will continue to release tld's at a slow but steady pace as that is what adds to their bottom line.
More adult and other tld's coming to a registrar near you.

Considering the obscene price point that .XXX is, someone should lobby to open a .adult(or equivalent) tld at decent prices.

.com will still be tops. Why should XXX.com become XXX.XXX? It is already self labeled.

tradermcduck 06-05-2005 09:49 AM

I guess servers are going to crash on the first registration day...

vvq 06-05-2005 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum Dave
Which registery you think will win the complete rights to sell them then?

No clue. But if they gave new.net the rights and made their .xxx domains legit it would set an unwanted precedent. You'd see these bullshit alternative top level domain registars popping up everywhere in hopes ICANN will some day make one of their extensions legit and give them the rights to sell it.

Sosa 06-05-2005 10:16 AM

new.net is fucking terrible their fucking install programs fuck up so many computers and internet connections.

TheSaint 06-05-2005 11:25 AM

How many times is this going to be discussed, people? new.net is a scam with no legal standing. Its like I started my own private registry of .com (perfectly legal) and sold adult.com, sex.com, etc. to peops and then anyone using my plugin gets that instead.

All fun and legal, but all bullshit and worthless.

taibo 06-05-2005 11:26 AM

time to get the nice ones now!

stevo 06-05-2005 12:30 PM

The registrars get the early picks...

"Registrars using their "lists" in landrush situations to serve their own interests rather than the public's":
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc12/msg00033.html
Jason Hendeles is Founder/CEO of ATech Registrars
Jason Hendeles is Founder/CEO of ICM Registry Inc
Is this the guy who is in charge of getting xxx up?

polish_aristocrat 06-05-2005 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevo
The registrars get the early picks...

"Registrars using their "lists" in landrush situations to serve their own interests rather than the public's":
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc12/msg00033.html
Jason Hendeles is Founder/CEO of ATech Registrars
Jason Hendeles is Founder/CEO of ICM Registry Inc
Is this the guy who is in charge of getting xxx up?

:BangBang:

hova 06-05-2005 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stevo
The registrars get the early picks...

"Registrars using their "lists" in landrush situations to serve their own interests rather than the public's":
http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/ga/Arc12/msg00033.html
Jason Hendeles is Founder/CEO of ATech Registrars
Jason Hendeles is Founder/CEO of ICM Registry Inc
Is this the guy who is in charge of getting xxx up?

:pimp :pimp

vicki 06-05-2005 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Platinum Dave
Which registery you think will win the complete rights to sell them then?

its all speculation .. Icann makes that decision.
In the absence of a trademark issue - for the moment ICM registry has been acknowledged by Icann as the registry.
I have a feeling that will change, but again, its speculation

Brujah 06-05-2005 02:54 PM

A lot of corruption in the registrars, but apparently "legal" and ICANN doesn't really care.

sixxxthsense 06-05-2005 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xclusive
new.net is pretty much a scam they are not nor will they be certified

I agree, i had somuch spyware from those fuckers before

TheSwed 06-05-2005 03:08 PM

I think it's already set up who will have the great xxx
http://www.sex.com/
look at the bottom of his site :pimp

JFK 06-05-2005 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSwed
I think it's already set up who will have the great xxx
http://www.sex.com/
look at the bottom of his site :pimp

so much for the bullshit about no one getting early dibs on names......not that I am against people owning the .com getting the xxx version :2 cents:

TheSwed 06-05-2005 05:37 PM

bump 4 more xxx stories :pimp


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123