CC Bill and These Non Nude Pedophiles
 

Frankly I am tired of seeing the company I use to process my member transactions processing sales for these fucking non nude sites.

Tanker's thread... http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...threadid=56200 was the last thing I needed to see. In light of all the webcamangel sites that blatantly steal content and hide behind the "Public Domain" bullshit that CC Bill processes for - and now I find more than one site that is truely not right, and should NOT being used to fuel a site using CC BIll.

http://www.nonude-network.com/ is a feeder site for a site that blatantly calls itself "Up To 17" they hide behind fashion and it fucking disgusts me.

I want to know how they get away with it, and why they get away with it.

As I said, frankly im tired of seeing a company I use to process hundreds of dollars a week, also making money of, call it my opinion, but its fucking CP.

Tankers thread says it all.

CC Bill why do you process for Up To 17?

This girl is 14 in a bikini posing like a fucking slut...
I dont care what country she is in, Im tired of seeing this. Clean up your shit.
http://up2-17fashion.net/gabby2.shtml

14 year old girls laying on their back raising their shirt is fucking illegal in my book.

Sorry, I've had it with this shit. Im fucking almost embarrassed that I use CC Bill now.

I love the service and the quality of service CC Bill provides me. NO complaints on this. Im just tired of seeing this Non Nude illegal shit.

Fucking 14 year old girls man... I cant fucking believe this, dont even know what else to say, fuck it.

Let the flames begin.

i was thinking the same thing, why was this guy getting checks from ccbill

They just busted some guy for taking photos like those, so I think they are gonna start cracking down on these so called non-nude sites.

Unbelieveable ccbill allowed this to happen. I think they owe all their LEGIT webmasters an apology and a big one for getting involved in this crap.

well put your money where your mouth is and cancel your fucking CCBILL account or shut the fuck up.

They've always processed these sites from Day 1.

Pick a different processor who will bring you more sales and lets you sleep at night.

Your post is utterly fucking worthless in this matter.

You bitch about them processing it, yet continue to make them money, I say you are just as bad as they are.

This all hit the fan for me about 30 mins ago.

You have no clue what youre talking about.

Just "close my account." Yeah okay. I have more affiliates pushing my site than you have sense. I will not simply end everything I have worked for, because of a few bad apples.

All over the news here. They are tring to find out if he did model searches here.

They have done this for years just about from the very beginning of being a processor. I'm sorry you never knew this but if you had checked into it before you choose them you would have known this.

You can change to another sponsor very easily, ARS & Oxcash both use Jettis, so you can too.



Glad you have so many affilates, but that doesn't mean shit, Serge had tons of affilates too.

I am also not putting you down, just telling you to switch from them or shut up.

Right, but instead of bringing up a good topic of discussion your first reply was "Close your account or shut the fuck up."

Im looking for more than that.

This has been discussed in the past, they just brush it off. You will not get the answer from CCBill you want, but if enough of you guys closed your accounts they would listen.

Well, the way to CCBill is obviously through their pocketbook.

As far as closing the sites down via the jackboot of the Feds, they should have to be doing something actually illegal first. Reprehensible isn't the same as illegal, unfortunately or fortunately, depending on how you view it. I think the industry can drive them out of business by applying economic pressure, and I would hope that's the first tack we take.

Once a Federal legal juggernaut on porn gets rolling, you might find yourself in the famous "be careful what you wish for" situation.

I am not condoning those sites in any way shape or form, but what's the difference between that page and Britney Spears first teen album cover where she's on her knees in BJ position with the words Baby, One More Time next to her face?

Like it or not, this kind of bullshit has now become both normal and accepted in our society, and these people are capitalizing on the same stuff that made Britney a millionaire. I was watching a Jessica Andrews (a teenage country singer) country video the other day and she hits the point where she says "I am young and I am able" and the camera slowly pans from her chest down to her crotch, I mean is it that subtle?

Your battle is the right one Fletch, but unfortunately society ain't on your side.

Nz

:2 cents:

It's not just CCBill, IBill also processes non-nude sites...

Nedder, I agree totally...

But what I am more concerned about are the people who take 1000's of these photos and put them online and charge people to see them.

A mag is one thing, I read a shirt on a girl today on the cover of a mag that said "being sexy doesnt mean you have to have sex."
Yeah okay that makes a lot of sense, thats just like saying "smoke but dont inhale." Of course the mag doesnt look like a teengirl mag although it is.

Thats not what Im talking about, shit ... sex sells, always has, thats why the tactics mentioned in marketing today has become so sexual.

Im more concerned with the people who horde young girl non nude content and make paysites.

As I said the one girl is 14. Now if it was one pic on a commerical thats one thing, but this material is housed in a sexual manner and put together as a DATABASE of girls ALL IN BIKINIs and then the URl blatantly says hey, keep in mind all these girls are UNDER 18.... what else I find funny is they use the 2257 Code in regards to models being of age, which means if they ARE of age then they are play acting, and for them to say she is 14 and not be, is just as illegal if not more.

Ive calmed down a bit since my original post, but am still concerned.

This is like the 4th time for me personally to have come across a site obviously pushing the limits too far for my taste. i doubt anything will come of it as stated by 4pics.

If the battle is lost, so be it. I tried at least. It could be your daughter.

I thought VISA already told them, that they will terminate them if they process for sites like this ?

hey guys .. they process with both ibill and ccbill .. so lay off ccbill a bit...

it's any biller out there... hell at least they're not processing for nude sites like some billers .. (adult bouncer)

get off kimmykim's snatch just cuz u met her and plan to do biz....

and i say that with my greatest endearment tadow

Calm down... Sites like Up2-17 are NOT illegal. If someone likes 14 year old girls in bikinis, well, I think he is just a normal person and not a pedophile!

Dick Harden,

Any adult (18+) who likes to look at underage girls in a sexual way is a pedophile.

********************
Dick Harden
Am I allowed to speak?
********************

No!

<p align="center"><font face="Arial" size="6" color="#FF00FF"><b>Shuddup!</b></font></p>

And go back to whatever rock you came from! :1orglaugh

Out of curiosity, what is "underage" to you?

According to you, is every guy in the world who looked at Britney Spears when she was 17 a pedophile?

If you think the girl in this picture is hot, then you are a pedophile, is that right?

http://www.britney-spears-home.citys...517909/183.jpg

For the record, I think that most, if not all, of the teen sites cross the line. However, accusing anyone who looks at 17 year old girls of being a pedophile is also crossing the line.

Mr.Fiction,

Don't ask me, I like a little older women ;-)

I think it depends on how old the person looking at the picture is.

At any point, I think using pictures of underage people on your site is just something you shouldn't do. And CC processors should terminate the processing accounts for these type of sites instantly - or make their screening procedure more effective.

I'm just sayin .. it ain't just ccbill man ... =P

The FBI has gotten involved in the way that these sites are being promoted.. They say they are "modeling" sites established to promote thier models, yet are being promoted on adult sites, or sites other than modeling sites. The feds have a problem with this..

I just see that almost everyhwere this discustions have started again. I have to say that some posts makes me wondering. I'm from Switzerland and we have Puplic swimingpools where Topless is just normal "ALSO FOR THE GIRLS" but just because of that not all the male who enter are pedophils no they just want to go swimming. Sure the chance that there are pedos is there to but sofar we never had any problem with that. What i have problem with is the false moral in the US (Sorry for all ) But let's be realistic in the US there are laws that are midelaged and on the other hand most of the sites you are crying about where hostet in the US. All the lolita sites which are around are ther because of the US Law. They state tha according the US Law theyr content is legal. You are shouting about sites which have no-nude girls but you should start shouting about the NUD Lolita sites. I say as long there are host which alow content like this there will be sites like this and there will be CCprocessors for that.

These sites are just wrong
I've seen sites like that with girls alot younger but a site like this is just to attract pedophiles.
If they like the clothes these girls wear they can buy a fashion magazine.
Weird that CC-Bill still deals with fuckers like this.
Illegal or not it is stuff where some sick pedophiles get a hardon from.

Im 18 and I like to look at my 17 year old girlfriend. Am I a pedophile?

For fucks sake...

These are fully clothed teenagers - GET A FUCKIN GRIP.
Even if they were naked they are not going to be classed as porn - no sexually provacative poses.

I'm a pedo now just because I think a 16 yo is pretty? (seeing as it's completely legal for me to marry a 16 yo - you can go and get fucked right there)

Some of you ppl have issues...and not of Penthouse

(spelling edit)

guys, you may not like it but if they aren't breaking the law, back off.
do you understand that there is a whole 'nother group of people out there saying,"that 21 yr old is sitting there with her legs spread wide open just for some perverts enjoyment! they should be shut down and the CC processor should be put out of business"

get it?
if its illegal, the law will take care of it. if its not, shut up.

I am not going to sit here and defend sites like these or even the nude sites...

But I brought this up during the beastiality debate...why were people so willing to fight for so called freedoms for something that is clearly illegal in the u.s. (beastie) but when it came to something that has been deemed constitutionally protected speech (so called artistic nudity sites) you guys are ready to have them shut down?

I think it's hypocritical to claim free speech regarding one (which is not protected) and not the other (which is)

The simple fact is these sites are not going to go away...they'll just change their modus operandi.

CP does not have to involve actual sex or nudity...any focus on the genital area even clothed, or simulated sex acts, or provocative posing can be considered cp.

And this asshole who got busted with the underage site apparently had these models doing more than just "modeling."

So in the future these people will still have these young girls appearing nude and in bikinis but make it look more sterile...but it will still sell.

And if ccbill stops processing them someone else will because they are making a ton of money off of them.

Once again I am not defending these places...in my opinion beastie, scat, piss, and this borderline cp crap just adds fuel to the fire to use against us law abiding hard working wm's and only makes our jobs harder.

But for now it's legally protected...so there's not much I can do about it other than focus on my business growing the legal moral way...LOL...I said moral and I'm a pornographer ;)

why do ppl always try to compare other types of media to the internet? the internet is a completely different ball game,,,you search for underage girls and you get it,,

its all good to have a non nude teen site,, but shit have a fucking membership for it? a database of over 1000's of pictures? live cam shows?

do you actually believe male teens and "Modeling Companies" are searching for these types of sites and becoming reaccuring members?

Naw, VISA will take care of it. We're in good hands.

That site's not shit, go to some of the Newsgroups.

And be very very careful want you wish for, because am pretty sure your going to be
getting some of it with this guy that's in charge RAT now Mr. John.

Besides they can just look on a web page, ever think if they can't just look what they would do.
Think about it...

All guys look at hot young girls.

Most the time you don't know how old they are.

With that said the young girls should not be exploited on the net however.

that sites not too bad (in uk 16 is legal to fuck and soft porn) I've seen far worse on ccbill / cavecreek, I think the owner (Ron Cadwell?) may be a beast fucker or a kiddie fiddler because CCBill and Cavecreek used to host and process for underage nude and animal sites for years, although they might not be doing it anymore, I would bet they still have a few servers full of that shit in fact I'm sure they stiill host animal sites

People should post when they find chicken fucking and underage sites hosted / proceses by them so that you can decide whether they want to be associated with that stuff or not


liek 12clicks says the law will decide whats right and wrong but you don't have to do business with people that could very possibly be people have sex with chickens

*holds head in hands*
I can't believe I have read something from this guy and agreed with it - but it's what I have been saying on every stupid 'nearly CP' thread for the past year...

Had to happen sometime I suppose...

Neither of which are illegal. And I am talking about non-nude here.

How many times are we gonna have this stupid fucking debate.

Not going to be a debate this time Labret, at least not as far as I am concerned.

Regardless of anyone on this boards personal feelings about these sites, the bottom line is that as defined under federal law, they are legal. Customs has looked at these sites and has no issue with them at all.

Our TOS clearly states that anyone under the age of 18 without their clothes on is not something we process for. Our TOS does not prohibit clothed people of any age in single person shots.

On a personal level, I'm not too sure about the parents of these kids, but then again I wouldn't allow my son to be in the average Calvin Klein ad, which is neither here nor there in the matter.

As far as attacking CCBill, I'm so used to it, it really doesn't bother me one bit. We've dumped sites that are legal in the past, we've complied entirely with Visa regulations, hell, we even canned the beastie entirely -- unlike some processors who'll do the charges with everything BUT Visa, or the ones that are trying to get Visa to allow them to continue to process the fake beastie sites. But no, the bitching goes on... and on... yet the people that scream the loudest keep right on cashing the checks we send them every week.

That last part isn't really directed at anyone in particular keep in mind, just a musing on my part...

but does ron shag chickens ?

Only when you're watching...

i knew that!

the smarter you get, the more often it will happen. It's like magic.

NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
*bangs keybord with fists in a fit of rage*

Of course you did, it's the rest of them that didn't realize it was a rhetorical question... ;)

That seems to be the way laymen use it, but actually the term "pedophile" is misused quite a bit around here and elsewhere. The technical psychological term refers to an interest in prepubescent children only. This does not imply that having sex with someone under 18 (or photographing them, either) is okay, because the law obviously needs to make distinctions, however arbitrary (in some European countries, for example, the age of consent remains 16, not 18).

the inevitable 'erotic pictures of 12yo girls is OK' hahaha was waiting for that one...

haha :1orglaugh

>> Any adult (18+) who likes to look at underage girls in a sexual way is a pedophile.

I don't think thats strictly true I mean some 15 year olds can look 18+ and some 18+ year olds can look 15

I think whats creepy is guys that are attracted to girls that look really young like -15 like you usually see on those non-nude teen sites

age and appearance are deceptive but guys that go deliberately for young girls because they are assholes and can't handle chicks their own age suck too

and guys that go for chickens