whats the final word on 2257?
 

everyone got quiet on this matter. where can i read an factual report of where the industry is right now on the matter.

main question is....are thumb TGPs liable for the thumbs they post?

I am sexy :pimp

new regs are getting tossed out

your breasts are milky :2 cents:

I don't care, I have your ID's and you saying on film you agreed to it all.

cool, but i need to read this for myself as well. have a link anywhere?

:mad: :mad: :mad:

damn you!!!!!!!!!!

i knew this would get back to me one day. i thought my father told you to get rid of that content!!!!!!!!

No shit dude. Has he been trying to back out on you as well?

If you are a member of the FSC, definitely not... for now anyway. Some say that covers the entire industry though regardless of a FSC membership or not.

Nice to know that I am not the only one you pulled this shit with. Your dad's check bounced. If he wants to buy that content off of me then he will need to send a cashier's check next time.

No exceptions! :mad:

final word is you hve to keep all the records for the entire industry. and, the attorney general wants an exclusive home video of you and the GILF in the act!

:(


:1orglaugh

damn you too aaronM!!!!!!!!!!!!


i will get my revenge on you all if you ever dare use that content!!!!

I am not even going to ask what "GILF" is. :Oh crap

no i'm not a member...this is why i need definite info.

thanks

he will never get that video of the GILF!!!!!!!

Didn't lots of programs shut down because of the fear of 2257? lol

lots of sites/programs/people did :(

XXX Content Direct
Check out Under News & Events

go to www.freespeechcoalition.com and start reading..... :upsidedow

I'd love to know the answer to this one too, Izz, so if you get a response feel free to share. :)

was this just a 'temporary injuction' that could be thrown out or is this resolved for secondary producers?

Acording to the FSC, only members are covered. We had a good discussion on this other thread about this situation.

2257 was a fake drama post

that's bs about only fsc members being covered. Why don't we all get together and try for an injuction on some new law that only covers 1 legged coal miners from kentucky...

I feel the same way

if it was canada, you would just have to go into court and show the agreement that the fsc got and it would be honoured. The governement can not make differnet rules for differnt people, it is un-constitutional.