GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Getting listed on Persian Kitty's TGP (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=58087)

kenny 04-24-2002 02:31 PM

Getting listed on Persian Kitty's TGP
 
I have been approved for every major TGP multipule times except Persian Kitty,
Is their something they look for thats different from the rest.
Should I be that worried about this?
I just want to know why I can't get posted there?:)

The Truth 04-24-2002 02:33 PM

PK is actually pretty easy compared to some of the other big dogs. If you're being listed everywhere else I can't imagine what the problem could be. Let's see a gallery.......

kenny 04-24-2002 02:38 PM

Here are a couple that made it on the big TGP's but never made it to PK(There are alot more)
http://naughtyxxxland.com/free/tgp/pro/pro_xxx.shtml
http://naughtyxxxland.com/free/tgp/a...sian_xxx.shtml
Thank You

vidsweb 04-24-2002 02:38 PM

I've said it before and I'll say it again....the only way to get listed on the majory TGPs is to use transexual midget clown content.

vidsweb 04-24-2002 02:40 PM

You have Javascript on the page.

Javascript = Bad

HTML = Good

The Truth 04-24-2002 02:44 PM

3 banners and 1 is flash and the stupid java....

You must be kidding. These galls aren't getting listed anywhere.

waste 04-24-2002 02:44 PM

you got listed on elephantlist with that?????????

kenny 04-24-2002 02:45 PM

Yea I use JavaScript only to add special effects to the thumbs, not to hide status sponsor URL's, or to create popup's. I do this because I read somewhere that giving a gallery a edge helps get you listed.
Never tried midget clown content.......probably do well:thumbsup

vidsweb 04-24-2002 02:47 PM

Lose the Javascript....the submit script will deny your gallery before any human reviewer even gets to see it.

Javascript is bad bad bad

Although, your page is clean and the content is decent.

Javascript is bad bad bad
Javascript is bad bad bad
Javascript is bad bad bad
Javascript is bad bad bad
Javascript is bad bad bad
Javascript is bad bad bad

waste 04-24-2002 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by kenny
Yea I use JavaScript only to add special effects to the thumbs, not to hide status sponsor URL's, or to create popup's. I do this because I read somewhere that giving a gallery a edge helps get you listed.
Never tried midget clown content.......probably do well:thumbsup

i think they meant blinking text and shit like that not JS the fuck out of it, you can give it an edge all you want but you went too far and fell off

vidsweb 04-24-2002 02:52 PM

By the way, I said "midget transexual clowns," not just regular midget clowns. They don't sell worth shit.

kenny 04-24-2002 02:53 PM

Thank you all for your advise. Next Gallery I make will be JavaScript free.:)

Theo 04-24-2002 02:53 PM

that's one ugly gallery with many bad things!

1st it exceeds 800x600 size limit
2nd the thumbs shake like milkshake!
3rd no tables,graphics,colors,nothing!
4th flash banner, not everybody accept flash on galleries
5th SSI file extension (.shtml),not everyone accept it


normally i think you should have problem getting listed in small tgps also

kenny 04-24-2002 03:00 PM

That one page that you didn't let finish loading falls in place and fits the 800X600 screen resolution, I used one big table and that caused that to happen. As far as .shtml extensions never seem to have had a problem yet, also that one gallery happens to be my first and I am proud of it:thumbsup
Did good in my eyes took me a half hour to make and made me $40.:)

Lexxx 04-24-2002 03:02 PM

I used to get listed there regularly and what she always wanted is more images than the average galley and a nice recip to her!

FlyingIguana 04-24-2002 03:02 PM

i use 1124x768 res and full screen window and the page doesnt fit on my screen. so no way it fits on 800x600

kenny 04-24-2002 03:04 PM

Does this gallery fit a 800x600 screen resolution?
http://naughtyxxxland.com/free/tgp/pro/pro_xxx.shtml
Please let this page load and verify that I don't have a magic laptop.

kenny 04-24-2002 03:15 PM

I believe next time I will make a Javascript free gallery and add 60 pics. Thanks for all the advise. :glugglug

FlyingIguana 04-24-2002 03:23 PM

i'd say max 30. 15-20 is a good number

Tipsy 04-24-2002 03:29 PM

60 pics? Good luck with getting someone to pay after all that free porn on one gallery.

Cali 04-24-2002 03:30 PM

If you added a simple width= and height= to your thumbs, it wouldn't go off the screen like that.

The days are over where you can just slap 10-20 thumbs on a page, fill it with banners and make a bucket of money. Try spending 30 mins more on the gallery, find a sales pitch and DESIGN a layout.

What I saw was a BW muncher, with little coins falling out of its mouth for you to pick up.

Steve 04-24-2002 03:36 PM

When I review by hand, I decline anything that pops up an Active X prompt. I don't care if it is a banner, I NEVER even look at the source code. I put that in the submit rules, so I don't waste time.

On sites running new smart submit admin scripts, I have almost every script/tag blacklisted. So I wouldn't even see this page, and you wouldn't even get the e-mail confirmation link to click.

Dump the javascript, and use jpg/gif banners (if you use banners at all)

kenny 04-24-2002 03:37 PM

Yea but if the girl on your sponsors banners are hotter then the girl on your thumbs people should click on the banner more right? What am I sayin that traffic will just move on to the next free gallery. :)
I will stick to 30 pics no JavaScript think I am going to use text links to promote sponsors rather then banners, text links seem to do better on my AVS sites.

DX 04-24-2002 03:48 PM

Quote:

5th SSI file extension (.shtml),not everyone accept it

quite possibly the stupidest rule I believe i've have seen anywhere.*

then again, this whole 'letting someone else tell you how to design your site' shit is quite stupid in and of itself, and has been since day one.

remember, you're giving them their content, on your dime.
they'll make far more money from your galleries andf return traffic
than you ever will.



*easy to get around the shtml rule though..
stick this in your .htaccess
AddHandler server-parsed .htm
AddHandler server-parsed .html

FATPad 04-24-2002 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by DX



quite possibly the stupidest rule I believe i've have seen anywhere.*

then again, this whole 'letting someone else tell you how to design your site' shit is quite stupid in and of itself, and has been since day one.

remember, you're giving them their content, on your dime.
they'll make far more money from your galleries andf return traffic
than you ever will.



*easy to get around the shtml rule though..
stick this in your .htaccess
AddHandler server-parsed .htm
AddHandler server-parsed .html

Don't submit then. :thumbsup

DX 04-24-2002 05:05 PM

I don't.. lol

I did my tgp experimenting a long time ago..

there are far easier, and less stressful ways to get traffic..
less in quantity, but better in quality traffic than you'd ever get submitting to tgp's..

kenny 04-24-2002 05:15 PM

I don't see why I can't use a template powered by a query string but they wouldn't allow it. Like the surfer really cares what the URL looks like. I do believe I am going to use that .htaccess trick to make all my pages server sides includes.
The way I see it if they use a script to automaticly check a page, why do they need to make us work harder then we need to by not allowing query string and .shtml (basicly SSI's) pages?
I have yet to my knowledge been rejected for a .shtml page, but I have been rejected when I attempted to use a template with execute command lines triggered by query strings in order to save me a whole lot of work.
And nobody reply with "then don't sumbit then" we all know that's not a option. If the road has pot holes I am going to bitch not quit driving.:thumbsup

jimmyf 04-24-2002 07:13 PM

Gallery's submited to TGP's = KISS
Always

shunga 04-25-2002 11:22 AM

Submit clean 15 picture galleries, with good pictures that aren't over-exposed, thumbs in sequence, and you'll find a PK listing easier to achieve than other big TGP's.

cherrylula 04-25-2002 12:38 PM

Why don't you just stop wasting time submitting to not get approved and just BUY some traffic or banner slots..... it can save you some time dood. Submissions are cool and all that, but to be honest I've gotten listed on some of the big tgp sites and have seen better results from friggin yahoo group traffic.

But hey... don't listen to me, I'm a newbie ;) Think about who you are trying to please..... Persian Kitty, or porn surfers ($$$)???

There are several ways to successfully skin a rabbit. eww

Steve 04-25-2002 12:48 PM

This is what TGP Owners feel about php/shtml galleries:
shtml = SSI = dynamic content =
gallery webmaster is going to fuck you over

MrBrian 04-25-2002 01:58 PM

pk is really easy to get listed
her rules are just different

kenny 04-25-2002 02:19 PM

After I thought about it for a while I realized that in the past some webmaster's probably have abused thier TGP listings using dynamic galleries and that is why those rules are here today.
I appreciate all the suggestions and information you guys gave to me on this thread, I have a better understanding of how I should build these galleries.:thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123