![]() |
Will new 2257 regs mean the end of PornoTube?
see title & discuss.
|
we can only hope, rite?
|
i hope so, fuck pornotube...
|
"New 2257 regulations" - ????????????????????????????????????
The '90s called - they need their 2257 regulations back |
will it also mean the end of google images?
|
Quote:
yeh, that whole new set of 4 numbers is a bish to remember :) PS: I do also wonder about the previous 'service provider' position if that still holds... Who's got Lensman on IM? I bet he might have someone hashing through the new text to get a grip on that. Pretty serious implications for board owners if an angle doesn't exist like it did for that. |
Fuck it ! Fuck it ! Fuck it :mad: !
|
i cant understand, what that means ? :S how bad is it?
|
The YouTube clones will try and weasel out of the 2257 regs. :2 cents:
Their weapon of choice is ignorance - that they have no control over their users. This is also how they will try and avoid the copyright lawsuits - saying their service belong under the DMCA :helpme The problem with this argument is that they are providing a service, which directly benefits from the content. Prosecutors and judges are not dumb people, they can see when someone does something with "intent". Ex. does not put the mechanisms in place, which could control the problem. Ask why Kazaa just paid $100 milllion to the recording industry: Quote:
So the clones are betting that they can keep the law enforcement + civil suits at arms length with the DMCA, while they kill of the competition who are playing by the rules. Or as one of the YouTube clones said "No one have the balls to do this beside us" :Oh crap |
Pornotube is possibly exempt due to the provision that allows for sites with no reasonable control over their content.
Otherwise, they can just limit submissions to those who provide 2257 docs, as their submission script already allows for. Those who are saying "Fuck PornoTube" simply aren't smart enough to use it to their advantage. |
it will be interesting to see what happens
|
PornoTube is aware much of their content is illegally posted. (copyright problems or home made porn with no way of being 2257 compliant)
If you knowingly facilitate criminal activity, you are breasking the law. |
yes probably
|
I hope so, The less porn out there the better for all of us:)
|
I think you are barking up the wrong tree if you think that is going to shut them down... it hasn't bothered all the image hosts, rapidshare etc that have been up for years now, so why would it shut down PornoTube?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
- Encodes - Stores - Distributes Even their own terms state that you must give them a sublicense for the video. You never see a photocopier, CD/DVD writer etc. asking you to give them a sublicense. |
Quote:
We respond immediately to DMCA requests. I've personally fulfilled three so far. No problem, no fuss, no bother. Have a great day :) |
Well hopefull it will be the end of them. I hope it will be the end for all the guba thieves and anyone else pulling the same shit.
I would like to see how they handle the documentation now. I wouldn't be suprised if they their asses turned in by other webmasters for improper docs. It could be a quick way to slam their faces in the mud and they could get some jail time to boot. Things that make you go hummmmm.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I hope pornotube doesn't go away, it is working very nicely for me, anyone who doesn't want it around obviously doesn't realize what a powerful tool it is for affiliates and sponsors alike |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Look up the legal definition of "distributor" as it applies in this context. |
Maybe the end of pornotube...
Until a similar site that isnt in the USA popps up. Thats why regulations like this are pointless, the internet is global, these laws only apply in the USA. But our lawmakers are too stupid, old, and clueless about the internet to grasp any concept of this. |
Quote:
IMO "If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck, then it?s probably a duck" :2 cents: As I wrote, then the weapon of choice is ignorance, and I do not expect any YouTube clone to suddenly say "Yes, we are not as ignorant as we state" - it would kinda make it hard to stay in business :winkwink: However I had hoped that the adult YouTube clones were less clones and more about business, since we as an industry have somewhat the same goals, which is making more money (well, at least I hope that is what everyone is looking to do). Of course as I and others have learned, then we do not agree on which are the priorities to reach that goal - most likely because the YouTube clones are looking at "taking", while we are looking at "making" :2 cents: But as the thread starter asked, then I would also like to know how the adult YouTube clones are looking at the new 2257 regs? |
Get that duck... ;)
Very true Rollo,
It seems that most have not gotten over the actual technologies to do some real business ! There is far to much hype in the adult community ! Being Canadian I don't have the same problems as you down in the States, however most of the good content provider are based across the border and it would be nice to hear more from more webmasters/owners who know their stuff ! Thanks for your time, |
Quote:
The site is about a month old, and is still in beta. Tools are rolling out now. A few testers already have access to the initial product stages. We are all about "making" - for our partners and our affiliates. That's what keeps us in business. Our partners know this. Rolo, my ICQ is in my sig. If you want to discuss anything, hit me up. I won't be replying to you on the boards any more. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123