Original recordings of Apollo moon missions are missing
 

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/0...eut/index.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- The U.S. government has misplaced the original recording of the first moon landing, including astronaut Neil Armstrong's famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind," a NASA spokesman said on Monday.


:warning I sale moon mission tapes :warning

We all know it was staged in a Hollywood studio anyway...

its on Ebay $5.99 buy it Now:winkwink:

It is physically impossible tp send humans to the Moon. The Van Allen radaition belts prevent Earth to Moon travel by humans. If you ever really watched thos "moon landing" films you could see that they are faked.

If we could go to the Moom why would we be trying to build a free-floating spacestation? Would it not be easier to build on the Moon?

The landing films and photos were very hightech for their time but any 15 year old with an iMac could do a better job today.

it was actually filmed in the Nevada desert but I understand what you meant.

ok you conspiracy theorists get your shit in order 'cause it's starting to confuse the rest of us.

First there's no moon landing, then they're building shit on Mars already in secret missions, we are talking to aliens, annunaki and on and on.

You'd think these so called theorists could sit down and agree on something!

But you are joking right?

Nope you can actually see the site with Google Earth... if I have time later I will dig up the pics.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I am not from the Tin-Foil-Hat club I am simply a realist. I have never said that we were building shit on Mars. I simply know enough about physics to know that humans cannot cross the Vann Allen Belts and survive. The amount of lead that would need to be in the shell of a craft designed to penetrate the belts would be too heavey to escape the Earth's gravity with current propulsion technology.

It is actually very simple if you just look at the data.

Santa Klaws on the other hand to zoom there and back in the twinkle of an eye.

And you don't even see how those two statements conflict...




*sigh*

Wikipedia:

Proponents of the Apollo Moon Landing Hoax have argued that space travel to the moon is impossible because the Van Allen radiation would kill or incapacitate an astronaut who made the trip. Van Allen himself, now deceased (August 9, 2006), dismissed these ideas. In practice, Apollo astronauts who travelled to the moon spent very little time in the belts and received a harmless dose. [6]. Nevertheless NASA deliberately timed Apollo launches, and used lunar transfer orbits that only skirted the edge of the belt over the equator to minimise the radiation. Astronauts who visited the moon probably have a slightly higher risk of cancer during their lifetimes, but still remain unlikely to become ill because of it.

You just said it's phisically impossible to send humans to the moon

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

with enough tinfoil maybe

Ok, I'll just wait till Dan Brown have his own story on this. :)

nice crack man..hehehe..

:1orglaugh

Yes please.

And do you have any evidence for your theory btw?

:thumbsup He could.:)

No they are not in conflict... I said "If we could then why..." that shows comparison not conflict.

Going to the Moon is quite a bit different than building something in orbit.

Brush up on your Astronomy and reading comprehension and come back.

China has been planning to land an unmanned rover by 2017 but keeps hedging. After catching wind of China's plans, Bushie Jr. announced the US would return in 2020.

we're all waiting for that google earth placemark froggy....

Hey they just lost it, shit happens, kinda like the time when they lost Kennedy's brain. Absolutely normal, nothing to see here folks.

Just check out http://moon.google.com/

They can just stage a new one. I started a thread awhile ago about how the whole thing was fake and stand by that claim, crazy or not.

Still waiting....

I dont agree with what he is saying - but there is no conflict there.....

wikipedia is only used by morons like yourself

it is all false info...in fact the radiation was highest when they went on their so called mission....their cameras werent protected either..so they would have been useless..the radiation would have wiped the film clean....also..the space station is inside the radiation belt to counter your idiocy in another post.

it is inside the radiation belt...get it?

Ahaha there he is, uber conspiracy retard Phoenix. Tell me, is there anything thats NOT a conspiracy??

we are pretty sure you are retarded...100% almost

Can you back that up?

sadly all empirical data was lost

Explain how you can hit the marker they placed on the moon with a laser.
tyvm

True...

It is not like it is something rare and unique, irreplacable ... sheesh.... :winkwink:

They can't.

Well i mean it's easy explainable since they landed there but conspiracy retards will ignore this. Right Phoenix?

Again, this is one of those issues where people choose one side or the other and refuse to listen to anyone.

It's entirely possible either way. There's nothing saying that it wasn't a production and there's nothing saying that they didn't really do it.

You can decide all you want, but it won't change minds, it won't prove anything and it still won't be accurate as to what likely really happened.

But by all means, continue.

in support of this, the first pictures taken at Chernobyl were only exposed to radiation a short amount of time. when they were developed, they were obviously flawed.. yet completely unprotected video reels returned unharmed. i havent decided what i believe, but i find that rather compelling..

Proof of man on the moon. :1orglaugh

http://www.blingstudio.com/franckmoon.jpg

Case closed. :thumbsup

Where did the rockets go? Where did the astronauts go then fall back to earth in the capsule into the ocean? How did we get moon rocks with different structures than earth rocks?

I was a boy living in california when tv had the moonlanding live from the moon, it was awesome.

Every theory that it was hoaxed has been busted over and over again.

yeah interesting stuff for sure...i think it is different radiation types though...also they the gamm rays from the sun...i could be wrong here...basically what the Earths magnetic field protects us against...those rays would have gone through all film and through everything once outside the van allen radiation belt...and ruined the phtogs


dont get me wrong..id rather like to believe we went

i just am not sure we did

after thinking about this for a fucking minute, we shouldnt be arguing if its fake or not.. we should be PISSED they are missing!! dont you think (real or not) these tapes are rather fucking important?? we have a national archives that keeps EVERYTHING.. yet nasa "cant find" the most important tapes in the history of their organization?? yet we are blinded by an argument about it being real or not.. FIND THE FUCKING TAPES, and somone can make a decision about it then... i know someones going to say "they cant find them because they arent real and dont want anyone to see them"... well, lets get pissed about that then! rather then fighting here, we should demand that they be found.. WTF is wrong with our government?! i dont know about you, but i am far from stupid and im getting really tired of MY government treating me like i am...

I don't know about you, but I'm not sure me looking around the office will help much.

:1orglaugh
That made me lawl

Actually, all the scientific evidence points to the theory that JTF had said. You say it was at the highest, do you have any factual proof to back that up besides a Fox TV special?

I mean the guy who discovered the belt actually came out and said they were fine. Or was he in on this conspiracy too?

Also for the tin foilers, where did that shuttle they launched go for a few days before landing? Did it just hang out in the atmosphere till this whole thing blew over?

Sig spot! :thumbsup

Sig spot! :thumbsup

This is false. Van Allen Radiation does not prevent travel to the moon. This is a lie perpetuated by conspiracy theorists.

No, obviously it would be much more difficult to build it on the moon.

This statement means absolutely nothing.

That's not a man, Thats just Franck and he's obviously an alien:)

See how its being ignored...Phoenix and the other retards are suddenly gone.