Phoenix, i have a question for you.
 

When exactly is something do you label something a conspiracy.

Is it like anything the government does is a conspiracy? And every clown that makes a home docu and puts it on the web is exposing the truth? Am i close? I think so.

If not then please explain us how retards like you come up with all this shit.

franck are you coming to l.a. in november with the rest of the dutchies?

You have a very strong grasp of the english language son

Damn, i made a fucking mistake. Jeesh.

So how is your Dutch?

Who is going?

we are sending extradition team to capture, um i mean escort nylz, wielco, ross, and the rest of them to l.a. for the webmaster access show.

why would I want to speak Dutch??

It's when something is presented to you with enough debatable material as to allow you to have enough of an open mind to question said material rather than accept what is presented to you simply at face value.

You know damn well what i mean faggot.

One i made a stupid mistake which could have happened in my own language as well and 2 english isnt my first language so please shut the fuck up.

I love Franck :D

get irritated much?...TROLL :321GFY

Only by irritating people.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :thumbsup

you must find it difficult being around yourself then

Wow..

http://www.teenportals.com/goodone.jpg

So the select few that have a conspiracy theory about every major event are in all actuality simply open minded and the rest of us are just blind sheep?

:1orglaugh

Yup yup.

If you want to see it that way, sure.

If PIB Cash comes here and says that they didn't really shave, it was a frame up by Al Queda... and you choose to believe them without questioning it.... well, you tell me what you are.

Or you could be less dramatic and simply accept that some people question things that they find questionable.

Um, no.

If Joe Blow told me Reality Cash shaved but Epoch told me they didn't, I would believe Epoch first. There is always the possibility that Epoch is lying to cover something up, but Joe Blow would be responsible for proving that. If the next day Joe Blow told me Nasty Dollars shaved but Epoch told me they didn't, again I would believe Epoch first. If the next day Joe Blow told me Top Bucks shaved, but again Epoch said no, I would think Joe Blow is an idiot, haha.

What if it was later proved that ONE of those sponsors WERE in fact shaving? Is Joe Blow now a credible source? Would you still believe Epoch in regards to the other two?

HOLY FUCK!!








im so glad franck got unbanned, this place just got 100x funner...


Franck for president.

If good ol Joe found proof then yes he would gain credibility. Then one would indeed question what else happens. I would not, however, then assume that EVERY sponsor shaves.

Let's hug it out.

That's an entirely reasonable response.
That's a disturbing one.

another boring franck thread

Then don't click them.