NATS vs Xclusivecash
 

there's just one thing I don't understand?

something extremely peculiar about the thread that started this, & I just realized something about it .. I need link to that thread to read it again before I say what's on my mind,,..



anyway, you people read the thread.. go read the part about somebody noticing discrepancies between ccbill stats & the stats in nats admin.. go read that part & think about that for a few minutes..

Seems like it's more NATS fault than anything else to me. Since there is no access to the source code how can there be discrepancies? NATS pulls the data from the billers. Program owner can't just program in a little feature to only pull 80% of the stats since they don't have access to the sourcecode.
Just my 2 cents... I could be way wrong here...

I hear what you are saying...it could have happened that way and NATS could be at fault in the long run, but what if xclusivecash knew about the "glitch" or whatever it could have been, and did nothing about it for months on end?

wasn't there some other NATS programs owners saying a while ago that occasionally the link between ccbill and nats get disrupted and needs to be "reattached" because of changes at ccbill or changes to the nats software? What if one of those disruptions occured, but xclusivecash never said anything, and continued to knowingly let rebills not get reported back into nats from ccbill?

I had something else on my mind,, but I'm not saying it til I read the thread & am 100% certain on what I remember,, I need to know if it was a "webmaster" that noticed discrepancies..

Its all just speculation. I guess the truth will come out if it goes to trial.

Oh, yeah & out of all these wonderful programs, Xclusive cash "(might/could/possibly") be the ONLY one (maybe) doing it,, I'm sure there's plenty others (could be doing the same).,, personally, I think,, well, never mind what I think...

Yes, that was said in the original thread. The discrepancy was pointed out by a 3rd party webmaster, TMM investigated, found the discrepancy and contacted XC.

well, that doesn't matter right now, cause XclusiveCash is the only one on trial (literally...LOL)

I fucking knew it, I call bullshit,, I smell bullshit,,,

You don't get CCBill stats for programs if you sign up through nats..

I think if someone did do this the rebills would not match and NATS would know. :2 cents:

Mark

Umm.. actually, it's NATS on trial.. :winkwink: :error

True..but you do get NATS stats and if you were doing any kind of volume it would be easy to see that the rebills had vanished.

if this is a nats issue and not just an XC issue how much money are you leaving on the table unclaimed each month?

so, how did this 3rd party notice discrepancies between ccbill stats & nats stats if the 3rd party only has nats stats?

With vanished I think means
Log in to nats >10 rebills
Log in again to nats 2 mins later > 5 rebills gone 5 left

I see shit like that all the time on tons of sponsors..

i thought u were actually going in a different direction. something that may be anotheoption that no one has mentioned yet....

i think that is something we will just have to find out as time progresses

haha, yeah...no shit...the big pink elephant in the room, huh? hahahaha

think multiple accts.. that is all i will say....

you got one of those too.. cool :thumbsup

*follows all the drama*

It was "implied" it was an insider... I should re-read the thread again as well but I thought it was something like some ccbill password or id number of something was changed by Xclusive but they didn't do a full implementation and so rebills didn't track back into nats. Thus XClusive pocketed all the rebill money coming in from ccbill and the affiliates were none the wiser.

It's interesting to read some real drama for a change.

I didn't realize that xclusive was 1. invite only and 2. 100% revshare no PPS so why shave too easy to get caught, something is fucked, a program with only 200 invited affiliates have to close a relationship to shave and WM's advanced enough to be doing revshare and invite programs (not chasing newbie scam BS) will notice real quick that they are missing rebills just from their average stats. I am going to trenton lol when does this start i want to watch....will be easy to get there from philly :D

./.......................

I was thinking this today following the other thread - Is XC the only nats based program with the hiccup rolling atm? I push a lot of programs using nats and I never notice anything odd, but now the question is there - sigh