![]() |
are sites michellelynn.com pedo sites?
i think if you get off on: http://www.michellelynn.com/
you have pedo issues |
Are you a real noob or just playing noob to get some more sig exposure ?
|
if that model is 18 - there is no issue.
i don't see anythign wrong with dressing someone up to look younger or older for sexual pleasure - so long as the model is 18+ |
© 2005 MichelleLynn.com - All rights reserved.
All models are 18 years old or older, and are portraying college girls 18 years of age or older. 18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement. then NO, it is NOT a pedo site... its called teen niche spaz |
No you have issues. Wtf.
Search up the def. for pedo. |
Quote:
|
Whoever voted no has got to be having a fucking laugh.
I actually voted number 3 but I can't really say unless I see her birth certificate. She may be as old as she is made to look, about 14. This site panders to all the pedos out there, even if she is 18 or older she certainly doesn't look and she is actually made to look a lot younger. At the end of the day if you wank over this you are getting off on a girl who looks 14 years old, now that can't be right. |
Quote:
Noun 1. pedophile - an adult who is sexually attracted to children the model on that site _looks_ like a child (even though it says shes 18+) |
its teen dude
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
she is portrayed as underage and that IS wrong and IS pandering to pedos |
Quote:
|
Well girls can be 17 or 18 you cant notice differenet.
|
don't see what the issue is she's 18....
she just has a young look to her look at all of the teen revenue sites i think a couple of those girls look younger then michelle does... and if your not promoting niche money you should give michelle lynn a shot she converts pretty dam good on teen traffic |
Quote:
thats what ID's are for buddy :thumbsup |
Quote:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/child child Pronunciation (chld) 1. A person between birth and puberty. 2. a. An unborn infant; a fetus. b. An infant; a baby. Puberty = 12 y.o. She doesnt look 12, therefore It's not pedo. End of thread. |
she is 18+ forsure...
|
hey elron with the pseudo child pedo site http://www.virginz.net/v2/ in his sig!
I am not sigwhoring just asking a question |
Quote:
I may not be pedo but it is certainly pandering to pedos, if you get off on 14 year old girls, doesn't matter if she is 18 she is made to look 14, then you are a pedo or at least a wannabe pedo. |
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I see no problem. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pedo = person who is attracted to children. Child = anyone under 12 years old. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
real question is - Should under age surfers be allowed to post on GFY and make comments about sites they know nothing about?
|
Quote:
and if the ID says 18 and you have all the docs to back it up then what? |
Quote:
What the fuck you talking about 12, in this country and i should imagine most, a 14, 15, 16 and even 17 year old are classed as children. |
Quote:
he's not underage he use to run digibucks now known as members money... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh do a search for digibucks i'm sure you'll find something more interesting than this bullshite |
Quote:
anyone under the age of 18 is considered a child... |
Quote:
I just gave you a definition for pedophile. Pedo = a person who is attracted to children under puberty (that means under 12 y/o) |
Quote:
Child = anyone under the age of puberty. |
Quote:
if you were to shoot a 17 year old nude what would happend you'd be charged with producing CP... now if you shot an 18 year old that looked like a 17 year old what would happen nothing... |
Quote:
There are 2 teen niches the normal -20 hot girls "teen" niche and the "teen girls made to look underage so perverts signup" niche. |
Quote:
You are wrong. You would be charged with "visual depiction of minors engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals" |
I love when my wife dresses up as a schoolgirl it turns me on :winkwink:
|
there are going to be people at both extremes on this
some will say she looks way younger then 18 so its wrong others will says shes over 18 so it doesnt matter promote it if you have teen traffic and you want it to convert and ignore it if you don't. it business and thats it. spaz |
Quote:
yea maybe you should stop posting |
Quote:
there you go thats a lot different then what you were saying above yes it does bring unwanted attention to the industry and to the sites within this niche but theres not much the public or the law can do if the girl is over the age of 18. go surf around and take a look at 90% of the other teen sites not just solo sites out there you will find atleast 1 girl on the sites that looks like she could possibly be underage and thats why 2257 is such a big issue and why the government is cracking down so hard and why so many companies are finally getting their shit together. you can't just single out one site when it comes to this stuff i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn |
>> i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn
yea teenrevenue whatever they are a bunch of pedo sites too |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think if your going to be dealing with this niche in particular you need to pay close attention to staying within the legal guidelines |
Quote:
Believe it or not everyone who has a mother and/or father is classified as children it doesn't matter what age they are. |
I don't often find myself agreeing with Dark Jedi about anything, but in this case he is pretty much correct. The true definition of "pedophilia" has to do with one having a sexual affinity for pre-pubescent children, which means around the age of 12 and younger.
It's just easier for people to toss the word "pedo" around even for underage minors 13-17, but it's not accurate. Is it right that older guys are slathering over underaged girls? Of course not. But if the models are all 18+ and there are docs to prove it, then the only issue is if the authorities want to argue over her "appearing to be underage". I'm not up on what exactly that law (if it exists) entails in the USA. (or Canada for that matter). I think I did hear a while back that they (the US gov't) was trying to create a law where they could go after such sites that blatantly make up their 18+ models to look younger and sexualize them on adult sites, non-nude included. But I don't know if it went into effect yet. |
This thread is funny because I just setup a promotion for her this morning
|
Dressing your wife up is perfectly ok! getting her to hug teddybears and suck lollypops thru cosmetic dental braces while you pretend she is your daughter is not!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh thats taking things to a whole other level |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123