GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   are sites michellelynn.com pedo sites? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=650950)

s9ann0 09-01-2006 09:28 AM

are sites michellelynn.com pedo sites?
 
i think if you get off on: http://www.michellelynn.com/
you have pedo issues

elron 09-01-2006 09:34 AM

Are you a real noob or just playing noob to get some more sig exposure ?

SleazyDream 09-01-2006 09:37 AM

if that model is 18 - there is no issue.

i don't see anythign wrong with dressing someone up to look younger or older for sexual pleasure - so long as the model is 18+

spazlabz 09-01-2006 09:37 AM

© 2005 MichelleLynn.com - All rights reserved.
All models are 18 years old or older, and are portraying college girls 18 years of age or older.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.

then NO, it is NOT a pedo site... its called teen niche


spaz

Dirty F 09-01-2006 09:38 AM

No you have issues. Wtf.

Search up the def. for pedo.

s9ann0 09-01-2006 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron
Are you a real noob or just playing noob to get some more sig exposure ?

in some countries (like the uk) there are laws against "Pesudo Child Porn"

Geeezer 09-01-2006 09:40 AM

Whoever voted no has got to be having a fucking laugh.

I actually voted number 3 but I can't really say unless I see her birth certificate. She may be as old as she is made to look, about 14.

This site panders to all the pedos out there, even if she is 18 or older she certainly doesn't look and she is actually made to look a lot younger.

At the end of the day if you wank over this you are getting off on a girl who looks 14 years old, now that can't be right.

s9ann0 09-01-2006 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Franck
No you have issues. Wtf.

Search up the def. for pedo.

ok why not!: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pedophile

Noun 1. pedophile - an adult who is sexually attracted to children


the model on that site _looks_ like a child (even though it says shes 18+)

squishypimp 09-01-2006 09:42 AM

its teen dude

The Ghost 09-01-2006 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream
if that model is 18 - there is no issue.

i don't see anythign wrong with dressing someone up to look younger or older for sexual pleasure - so long as the model is 18+

100% agreed. If they are over 18 yrs old, everything else is a moot point.

Geeezer 09-01-2006 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spazlabz
? 2005 MichelleLynn.com - All rights reserved.
All models are 18 years old or older, and are portraying college girls 18 years of age or older.
18 U.S.C. 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement.

then NO, it is NOT a pedo site... its called teen niche


spaz

OK so if she is 18 then it's not illegal (I suppose) but does that make it OK?

she is portrayed as underage and that IS wrong and IS pandering to pedos

elron 09-01-2006 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
in some countries (like the uk) there are laws against "Pesudo Child Porn"

90% of the teen sites are using legal 18+ girls with kiddie faces that look way younger than 18 , of course all of them declare that they are over 18 so officially they dont pesudo childporn .Your poll is either comming from naive point or sigwhoring interest .

Klen 09-01-2006 09:45 AM

Well girls can be 17 or 18 you cant notice differenet.

jacked 09-01-2006 09:46 AM

don't see what the issue is she's 18....

she just has a young look to her

look at all of the teen revenue sites i think a couple of those girls look younger then michelle does...

and if your not promoting niche money you should give michelle lynn a shot she converts pretty dam good on teen traffic

jacked 09-01-2006 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris
Well girls can be 17 or 18 you cant notice differenet.


thats what ID's are for buddy :thumbsup

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
ok why not!: http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pedophile

Noun 1. pedophile - an adult who is sexually attracted to children


the model on that site _looks_ like a child (even though it says shes 18+)


http://www.thefreedictionary.com/child

child Pronunciation (chld)
1. A person between birth and puberty.
2. a. An unborn infant; a fetus.
b. An infant; a baby.


Puberty = 12 y.o.
She doesnt look 12, therefore It's not pedo.

End of thread.

madawgz 09-01-2006 09:51 AM

she is 18+ forsure...

s9ann0 09-01-2006 09:52 AM

hey elron with the pseudo child pedo site http://www.virginz.net/v2/ in his sig!
I am not sigwhoring just asking a question

Geeezer 09-01-2006 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/child

child Pronunciation (chld)
1. A person between birth and puberty.
2. a. An unborn infant; a fetus.
b. An infant; a baby.


Puberty = 12 y.o.
She doesnt look 12, therefore It's not pedo.

Maybe not, but number 3 in the poll sums it up.

I may not be pedo but it is certainly pandering to pedos, if you get off on 14 year old girls, doesn't matter if she is 18 she is made to look 14, then you are a pedo or at least a wannabe pedo.

s9ann0 09-01-2006 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Puberty = 12 y.o.
She doesnt look 12, therefore It's not pedo.

End of thread.

tell that to the US2257 inspectors when they come to visit!

uno 09-01-2006 09:54 AM

http://www.michellelynn.com/images/2257-Notice.gif

Geeezer 09-01-2006 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uno

And???? .

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
tell that to the US2257 inspectors when they come to visit!

She is 18+ and has 2752 on file.

I see no problem.

s9ann0 09-01-2006 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SleazyDream
if that model is 18 - there is no issue.

i don't see anythign wrong with dressing someone up to look younger or older for sexual pleasure - so long as the model is 18+

what about if they are 18 but they look 5 years old is that ok?

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geeezer
if you get off on 14 year old girls then you are a pedo or at least a wannabe pedo.

No you are not.

Pedo = person who is attracted to children.
Child = anyone under 12 years old.

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
what about if they are 18 but they look 5 years old is that ok?

Yes, thats OK.

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
No you are not.

Pedo = person who is attracted to children.
Child = anyone under 12 years old.

I dunno where you live kazakstan or something but in the western world the the law says its 18 years old

TheLegacy 09-01-2006 10:04 AM

real question is - Should under age surfers be allowed to post on GFY and make comments about sites they know nothing about?

jacked 09-01-2006 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
I dunno where you live kazakstan or something but in the western world the the law says its 18 years old


and if the ID says 18 and you have all the docs to back it up then what?

Geeezer 09-01-2006 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
No you are not.

Pedo = person who is attracted to children.
Child = anyone under 12 years old.

If you wank over a 14 year old girl you ARE either a pedo or a wannabe pedo or a future pedo, simple as that.

What the fuck you talking about 12, in this country and i should imagine most, a 14, 15, 16 and even 17 year old are classed as children.

jacked 09-01-2006 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy
real question is - Should under age surfers be allowed to post on GFY and make comments about sites they know nothing about?


he's not underage he use to run digibucks now known as members money... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

do a search for digibucks i'm sure you'll find something more interesting than this bullshite

jacked 09-01-2006 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geeezer
If you wank over a 14 year old girl you ARE either a pedo or a wannabe pedo or a future pedo, simple as that.

What the fuck you talking about 12, in this country and i should imagine most, a 14, 15, 16 and even 17 year old are classed as children.


anyone under the age of 18 is considered a child...

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
I dunno where you live kazakstan or something but in the western world the the law says its 18 years old

The law says 18 years old is what?


I just gave you a definition for pedophile.

Pedo = a person who is attracted to children under puberty (that means under 12 y/o)

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacked
anyone under the age of 18 is considered a child...

Wrong. Anyone under the age of 18 is considered a minor.

Child = anyone under the age of puberty.

jacked 09-01-2006 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
Wrong. Anyone under the age of 18 is considered a minor.

Child = anyone under the age of puberty.


if you were to shoot a 17 year old nude what would happend you'd be charged with producing CP... now if you shot an 18 year old that looked like a 17 year old what would happen nothing...

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacked
and if the ID says 18 and you have all the docs to back it up then what?

The point is these sites make girls look underage and cater to pedos and its sites like this that makes the general public think we are all pushing CP and does us no good.

There are 2 teen niches the normal -20 hot girls "teen" niche and the "teen girls made to look underage so perverts signup" niche.

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacked
if you were to shoot a 17 year old nude what would happend you'd be charged with producing CP...


You are wrong.

You would be charged with "visual depiction of minors engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals"

Monstaman 09-01-2006 10:16 AM

I love when my wife dresses up as a schoolgirl it turns me on :winkwink:

spazlabz 09-01-2006 10:17 AM

there are going to be people at both extremes on this

some will say she looks way younger then 18 so its wrong
others will says shes over 18 so it doesnt matter

promote it if you have teen traffic and you want it to convert and ignore it if you don't.

it business and thats it.


spaz

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheLegacy
real question is - Should under age surfers be allowed to post on GFY and make comments about sites they know nothing about?


yea maybe you should stop posting

jacked 09-01-2006 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
The point is these sites make girls look underage and cater to pedos and its sites like this that makes the general public think we are all pushing CP and does us no good.

There are 2 teen niches the normal -20 hot girls "teen" niche and the "teen girls made to look underage so perverts signup" niche.


there you go thats a lot different then what you were saying above yes it does bring unwanted attention to the industry and to the sites within this niche but theres not much the public or the law can do if the girl is over the age of 18.

go surf around and take a look at 90% of the other teen sites not just solo sites out there you will find atleast 1 girl on the sites that looks like she could possibly be underage and thats why 2257 is such a big issue and why the government is cracking down so hard and why so many companies are finally getting their shit together.

you can't just single out one site when it comes to this stuff

i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:23 AM

>> i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn

yea teenrevenue whatever they are a bunch of pedo sites too

jacked 09-01-2006 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkJedi
You are wrong.

You would be charged with "visual depiction of minors engaged in a sex act such as intercourse, oral sex, or masturbation as well as the lascivious depictions of the genitals"

atleast 3 sites named in this thread do it... but how do they justify what is considered border line and not just an 18 year old being an 18 year old or an 18 year old being a 17 year old which like you said would be illegal?

spazlabz 09-01-2006 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacked
there you go thats a lot different then what you were saying above yes it does bring unwanted attention to the industry and to the sites within this niche but theres not much the public or the law can do if the girl is over the age of 18.

go surf around and take a look at 90% of the other teen sites not just solo sites out there you will find atleast 1 girl on the sites that looks like she could possibly be underage and thats why 2257 is such a big issue and why the government is cracking down so hard and why so many companies are finally getting their shit together.

you can't just single out one site when it comes to this stuff

i honestly think little summer and little april look much younger than michelle lynn

right! :thumbsup that is exactly why sites that deal with teen content really need to have their shit together and i would bet everyone of the sites you mentioned are very prepared for an investigation if the gov turned up at their doors.

I think if your going to be dealing with this niche in particular you need to pay close attention to staying within the legal guidelines

thumbsdepot 09-01-2006 10:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geeezer
If you wank over a 14 year old girl you ARE either a pedo or a wannabe pedo or a future pedo, simple as that.

What the fuck you talking about 12, in this country and i should imagine most, a 14, 15, 16 and even 17 year old are classed as children.


Believe it or not everyone who has a mother and/or father is classified as children it doesn't matter what age they are.

CDSmith 09-01-2006 10:25 AM

I don't often find myself agreeing with Dark Jedi about anything, but in this case he is pretty much correct. The true definition of "pedophilia" has to do with one having a sexual affinity for pre-pubescent children, which means around the age of 12 and younger.

It's just easier for people to toss the word "pedo" around even for underage minors 13-17, but it's not accurate.

Is it right that older guys are slathering over underaged girls? Of course not. But if the models are all 18+ and there are docs to prove it, then the only issue is if the authorities want to argue over her "appearing to be underage".

I'm not up on what exactly that law (if it exists) entails in the USA. (or Canada for that matter). I think I did hear a while back that they (the US gov't) was trying to create a law where they could go after such sites that blatantly make up their 18+ models to look younger and sexualize them on adult sites, non-nude included. But I don't know if it went into effect yet.

CIVMatt 09-01-2006 10:27 AM

This thread is funny because I just setup a promotion for her this morning

s9ann0 09-01-2006 10:28 AM

Dressing your wife up is perfectly ok! getting her to hug teddybears and suck lollypops thru cosmetic dental braces while you pretend she is your daughter is not!

DarkJedi 09-01-2006 10:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jacked
atleast 3 sites named in this thread do it... but how do they justify what is considered border line and not just an 18 year old being an 18 year old or an 18 year old being a 17 year old which like you said would be illegal?

Are you trolling me or are you really an idiot?

jacked 09-01-2006 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spanno
Dressing your wife up is perfectly ok! getting her to hug teddybears and suck lollypops thru cosmetic dental braces while you pretend she is your daughter is not!



:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

thats taking things to a whole other level


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123