Mark Cuban: Only a 'moron' would buy YouTube
 

As much as I enjoy access to all the clips, I've never understood how they could host all that copyrighted content. What's the difference between them and Napster of old?

http://money.cnn.com/2006/09/29/tech...ex.htm?cnn=yes

http://i.cnn.net/money/2006/09/29/te...m_cuban.03.jpg

hypocritical perhaps? :1orglaugh

says the guy who sold broadcast.com to Yahoo for $5.7 billion. Hypocrite?

Well he's still going to make alot of money out of it.

Jesus i diddnt realize it had that many visitors that must burn alot of bandwith

I believe the fallacy is that you cannot be rich and a moron at the same time.

http://i.cnn.net/money/2006/09/29/te...m_cuban.03.jpg

:1orglaugh (hint: see picture)

reminds me of the guys who wanted to buy google and said nah itll never be anything big

he sold it for yahoo stock not cash

It burns a ton of bandwidth.

Broadcast.com licensed their content. It's sad you can't understand basic concepts.

i just wish i had that kind of money to throw away thats all!! man so hes the one huh? well i should of known from the begining

Yea, I was going to mention that.

I never understood why sites like this don't just pay ASCAP, BMI, etc. to keep the music people off their asses. I know it doesn't help them with the TV/Movie uploads but still....do they do this? Am I missing something?

Youtube and napster are not same.On napster you can download video on youtube cant.Unless you use plugin.