GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Is this a good deal for a Plasma T.V. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=681098)

Shoehorn! 11-26-2006 11:10 PM

Is this a good deal for a Plasma T.V.
 
$900 for the following, good deal or not?

Features:
HDTV Ready
1024×1024 Resolution
720p and 1080i capable
16:9 aspect ratio
1000:1 Contrast ratio
16 million colors
1100 cd/m2 brightness
True XGA Display Capability (over 1,000,000 pixels)
Excellent Off-axis Viewing ? 175º (Vertical/Horizontal)
Dynamic Automatic Image Picture Control
Digital Progressive Scan
3D Digital Y/C Separation
720 TVL
3D Chrominance-luminance Separation
Digital Progressive Scanning
Dynamic Automatic Image Control
Dimensions (WxHxD) 40.8? x 25.2? x 4.6?
Weight: 78.8lbs

Inputs:
DVI with HDCP
Composite x 3
Component x 2
S-Video x 3
D-SUB 15
RS-232 serial (D-Sub 9)

Outputs:
Monitor
Video (BNC/RCA)
Audio (RCA x 2)
External Speaker Optional; Push-type connector
Included:
Sanyo PDP-42H2A 42? Plasma
Remote Control w/Batteries
Owner?s Manual
AC Power Cord
BNC-RCA Converter Jacks

Yes or no?

Pete-KT 11-26-2006 11:12 PM

siounds good, where is it from?

Sly 11-26-2006 11:12 PM

Great deal. My 37" this summer was $1900.

MikeVega 11-26-2006 11:14 PM

I paid $700 for a 32 LCD .. SO a 40 for $900 seems pretty good to me but I'm sure someone here can give you a much more detailed answer

notabook 11-26-2006 11:14 PM

The HDTV ready is the only thing that I don't like about it, means it has no HD-tuner. But if you are using devices that have tunes in them it won't be an issue. Only issue other than that is it's '1024x1024' resolution, it couldn't possibly be true 1080i (1920x1080 resolution). Price seems pretty fucking solid, regardless.

Shoehorn! 11-26-2006 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 11399579)
The HDTV ready is the only thing that I don't like about it, means it has no HD-tuner. But if you are using devices that have tunes in them it won't be an issue. Only issue other than that is it's '1024x1024' resolution, it couldn't possibly be true 1080i (1920x1080 resolution). Price seems pretty fucking solid, regardless.

With the HD thing, if I am watching a channel that is broadcast in HD the it won't display as true HD?

notabook 11-26-2006 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn! (Post 11399592)
With the HD thing, if I am watching a channel that is broadcast in HD the it won't display as true HD?

Not if your device (say satellite receiver) isn't an HD-device. Most devices with component or better hookups do have HD tuners, but definitely not all. Double check first that your receiver has a HD tuner in it.

marketsmart 11-26-2006 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn! (Post 11399592)
With the HD thing, if I am watching a channel that is broadcast in HD the it won't display as true HD?

ask chio to give you one... he has 23 (32 inches) and 17 (50 inches)....

he has some guy from new york that gets them after they fall off some truck...

Sly 11-26-2006 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 11399609)
Not if your device (say satellite receiver) isn't an HD-device. Most devices with component or better hookups do have HD tuners, but definitely not all. Double check first that your receiver has a HD tuner in it.

If you're going through cable or satellite, its an extra $5-10 a month for the HD service, which includes a tuner.

If you're going through antenna for the basic broadcast channels (total waste of HD, IMO), then yes, an actual tuner will be needed.

Martin3 11-26-2006 11:29 PM

Not really.
Shitty colors, not built in HD tuners, no HDMI(most HDCP compliant dvd's players, etc use HDMI, you'll need a dvi to hdmi converter most likely), low contrast, no digital audio outputs, etc......
For $500-600 you could get a much much better plasma.

Shoehorn! 11-26-2006 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 11399627)
If you're going through cable or satellite, its an extra $5-10 a month for the HD service, which includes a tuner.

If you're going through antenna for the basic broadcast channels (total waste of HD, IMO), then yes, an actual tuner will be needed.

Ah, cool. Thanks. :thumbsup

notabook 11-26-2006 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 11399627)
If you're going through cable or satellite, its an extra $5-10 a month for the HD service, which includes a tuner.

If you're going through antenna for the basic broadcast channels (total waste of HD, IMO), then yes, an actual tuner will be needed.

Right, which is what I said in fewer words. :1orglaugh Because words lead to books and books are for fags. :|

Shoehorn! 11-26-2006 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 11399609)
Not if your device (say satellite receiver) isn't an HD-device. Most devices with component or better hookups do have HD tuners, but definitely not all. Double check first that your receiver has a HD tuner in it.

We're not supposed to talk about that.

Shoehorn! 11-26-2006 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 11399659)
Right, which is what I said in fewer words. :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

Martin3 11-26-2006 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 11399627)
If you're going through cable or satellite, its an extra $5-10 a month for the HD service, which includes a tuner.

If you're going through antenna for the basic broadcast channels (total waste of HD, IMO), then yes, an actual tuner will be needed.

Waste of HD?
OTA HD broadcasts have some of the highest bandwidth through put currently. Sat and cable companies lower bitrates and resolutions(1440x1080) to save on bandwidth. Both directtv and dish do this with all their HD channels aswell as most cable companies.

Sly 11-26-2006 11:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Martin3 (Post 11399667)
Waste of HD?
OTA HD broadcasts have some of the highest bandwidth through put currently. Sat and cable companies lower bitrates resolutions(1440x1080) to save on bandwidth. Both directtv and dish do this with all they're HD channels aswell as most cable companies.

Getting only the network channels as opposed to getting channels like ESPN, TNT, Discovery, and HBO... yes, a waste. :-)

cybermike 11-26-2006 11:36 PM

its actually $905 :P

thebossxxx 11-26-2006 11:37 PM

sounds good to me! Good luck with it!

notabook 11-26-2006 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 11399678)
Getting only the network channels as opposed to getting channels like ESPN, TNT, Discovery, and HBO... yes, a waste. :-)

hahaha... so true. :thumbsup

Martin3 11-26-2006 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 11399678)
Getting only the network channels as opposed to getting channels like ESPN, TNT, Discovery, and HBO... yes, a waste. :-)

Yeah for those you got to pay extra, but if you watch any of the local HD channels it's best to get them OTA then through your cable/sat company in most cases.

Tryme 11-27-2006 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 11399579)
The HDTV ready is the only thing that I don't like about it, means it has no HD-tuner. But if you are using devices that have tunes in them it won't be an issue. Only issue other than that is it's '1024x1024' resolution, it couldn't possibly be true 1080i (1920x1080 resolution). Price seems pretty fucking solid, regardless.

1080p is 1920x1080

I would save your money, they ran some killer deals at Frys/Bestbuy over this last weekend on Panasonic 42/50" and I would wait and get one of those.

I have been wanting the Pioneer Elite 50" 1080p plasma but I really don't want to spend $9500.

notabook 11-27-2006 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tryme (Post 11399821)
1080p is 1920x1080

so is 1080i. :thumbsup

And personally for me I?m waiting for SED TV?s before I get a better TV. For now I have a Hitachi 51? HDTV Projection CRT and I couldn?t be happier with it. I don?t like how LCD and Plasma screens look; when SED screens come out I?ll be just as happy as an Iraqi civilian getting a free taco on Wednesday.

GigoloJustin 11-27-2006 12:41 AM

send us joins and we will buy you one. Free is always better!

GigoloJustin 11-27-2006 12:42 AM

send us joins and we will buy you one. Free is always better!

Serious-Partner 11-27-2006 12:55 AM

I paid 4k$ for my 43" pioneer. that's awesome!

jonesy 11-27-2006 12:56 AM

http://www.sportys.com/shoppl/images/5091m.jpg

jonesy 11-27-2006 12:59 AM

http://www.doctormacro.com/Images/Ho...%20Lena_01.jpg

ozmatt 11-27-2006 01:06 AM

$3k for my 40" Samsung LCD

http://www.samsung.com/au/products/t...s/l_la40r7.jpg

tv's seem alot cheaper in the US :(

venus 11-27-2006 01:39 AM

Do you need a plasma TV or you just wanting to get one because its cool or you can hang it on a wall?

Plasma is not all that any more, once upon a time it had a great picture, now its just an ok picture compared to some of the new technology on the market.

I have the Samsung 61 DLP HDTV, when I was shopping I went in to get a plasma, but left with the DLP instead, picture was way better in my opinion, its also 1080P.. best picture I have ever seen on a TV... I have zero complaints

http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Samsu...oductDetail.do

Dirty Dane 11-27-2006 01:55 AM

Do NOT buy 1024×1024!!! 1920x1080 resolution is the resolution for blu-ray!!!

Shoehorn! 11-27-2006 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cybermike (Post 11399679)
its actually $905 :P

HAHA, true. :)

Centurion 11-27-2006 01:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by venus (Post 11400011)
Do you need a plasma TV or you just wanting to get one because its cool or you can hang it on a wall?

Plasma is not all that any more, once upon a time it had a great picture, now its just an ok picture compared to some of the new technology on the market.

I have the Samsung 61 DLP HDTV, when I was shopping I went in to get a plasma, but left with the DLP instead, picture was way better in my opinion, its also 1080P.. best picture I have ever seen on a TV... I have zero complaints

http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Samsu...oductDetail.do

Have to agree with you on the dlps..I ended up getting a 62 inch Toshiba dlp HD set..better pic that a plasma or lcd hd screen.

Shoehorn! 11-27-2006 02:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by venus (Post 11400011)
Do you need a plasma TV or you just wanting to get one because its cool or you can hang it on a wall?

Plasma is not all that any more, once upon a time it had a great picture, now its just an ok picture compared to some of the new technology on the market.

I have the Samsung 61 DLP HDTV, when I was shopping I went in to get a plasma, but left with the DLP instead, picture was way better in my opinion, its also 1080P.. best picture I have ever seen on a TV... I have zero complaints

http://www.circuitcity.com/ssm/Samsu...oductDetail.do

I don't really NEED a new one at all, but if its a good deal then its working picking up.

Thanks for the link, I'll check it out. :thumbsup

Shoehorn! 11-27-2006 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn! (Post 11400070)
I don't really NEED a new one at all, but if its a good deal then its working picking up.

Thanks for the link, I'll check it out. :thumbsup

By the way, this isn't you is it? I need to figure out who she is so I can go join her site. :Graucho

http://picturehost.com/d/9742-1/Ever...ife-11-036.jpg

venus 11-27-2006 02:24 AM

nope, never seen her before, but if you find out who she is let me know


Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn! (Post 11400083)
By the way, this isn't you is it? I need to figure out who she is so I can go join her site. :Graucho


rounders 11-27-2006 04:22 AM

that deal must be on woot on what your talking about

salesman 11-27-2006 04:37 AM

sounds good.
when i will buy a plasma TV pre prices will be even more lower

uno 11-27-2006 04:50 AM

Just get a DLP.

Lykos 11-27-2006 04:55 AM

Its much more expenciere here,but i dont like plasma anyway :(

reynold 11-27-2006 06:59 AM

I guess that aint bad at all, mate. :thumbsup

4Man 11-27-2006 08:19 AM

I heard better.
One like this for 800$

JerseyPuma 11-27-2006 08:46 AM

whats the brand? thats a good deal if you want to put it on the wall and have it look nice, but youre going to get much better pictures with both DLP and (especially) the SXRDs from Sony. And like notabook said above, it sounds like once SEDs come out (probably not for at least a year) they will set the standard for picture quality.

wedouglas 11-27-2006 08:57 AM

You can do better. That isn't even an HD resolution. You can get 1080p LCDs for only a tad more. I doubt you are super concerned with things like black levels etc. I'd keep looking.

JJSLIMM 11-27-2006 09:50 AM

You can find some pretty good deals from this site on HD tv's for today only http://bfads.net/

I think some of these sales are still going but not sure which ones http://bfads.net/search.php?what=HD+...re=all&cat=all

jonesy 11-27-2006 05:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shoehorn! (Post 11400083)
By the way, this isn't you is it? I need to figure out who she is so I can go join her site. :Graucho

http://picturehost.com/d/9742-1/Ever...ife-11-036.jpg

ask xxxjay he was hanging out with her.

Scott McD 11-27-2006 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozmatt (Post 11399945)
$3k for my 40" Samsung LCD

http://www.samsung.com/au/products/t...s/l_la40r7.jpg

tv's seem alot cheaper in the US :(

Some of the tv's over here are stupidly priced aswell. At the end of the day, it's the same shit you're watching anyway... :winkwink:

Kimo 11-27-2006 08:03 PM

sounds like a good deal

Ohface 11-27-2006 08:06 PM

I think it's worth the money so go for it.:)


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123