GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - Man who took Saddam phone video arrested

- Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)

- - Man who took Saddam phone video arrested (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=692341)

Man who took Saddam phone video arrested

so the BBC says..wonder what the punishment for that is ?

They are crease .. because of the phone .. ?

Depends who is he under ;)

Punishment is hanging. LMAO.

Quote:

Originally Posted by NemesiS876 (Post 11645229)

They are crease .. because of the phone .. ?

I tried but I don't understand your comment...they weren't suppose to film other than the official version

The circus is starting again, now the Hypocrates in the US are trying to spin the whole thing, as they have tried to stop the execution. WHAT A CROCK OF SHIT:2 cents:

it was illegal to record it, so it's good that he got arrested

Some reports are suggesting it was National Security Adviser Mowaffak al-Rubaie, who works for Maliki, the Prime Minister of Iraq.

Worse than that, the official video shown on TV in Iraq (which doesn't show Saddam's actual hanging), had no audio, but the cell phone version posted all over the net, clearly has Saddam and others exchanging taunts during Saddam's final minutes, in what was supposed to be a solemn event.

Apparently this was part of the exchange:

Quote:

After Saddam recited prayers, the guards shouted praise for Muqtada al-Sadr, the radical Shiite cleric.

"Is this how you show your bravery as men?" Saddam asked.

"Straight to hell," someone shouted back at him.

"Is this the bravery of Arabs?" Saddam responded.

A sole voice was heard trying to silence the insults.

"Please, I am begging you not to," the unknown man said. "The man is being executed."

This is certain to enflame Sunni-Shiite anger even more.:Oh crap :disgust

ADG Webmaster

The guy should never have been hanged. It just shows that the people he ruled over are no better than he treated them.

they have played the full audio version on the BBC..the original version was soundless..now we know why

This editorial was succinct and totally on point:

Quote:

THE execution on Saturday of Saddam Hussein may have marked the passing of one of the vilest tyrants of the late 20th century. But the way in which the Baghdad hangmen turned it into a public lynching will have profound consequences for Iraq, for the Middle East and for those powers that so recklessly meddle in its politics.

While President George Bush may hail the dictator?s demise as another ?milestone? on Iraq?s path to democracy, it looks just as likely it will turn out to be another paving stone on the road to the sectarian hell into which Iraq is descending.

With this squalid act, the Shiite-dominated government led by Nuri al-Maliki has for all practical purposes abandoned any pretence that it aims to govern on behalf of all Iraqis.

At one level, the new, ostensibly democratic administration showed it was no different from its predecessors in needing to dramatise regime change with violent or gory images of dead and defeated leaders.

At another, this was conceived as an act of vengeance and designed to exemplify Shiite hegemony.

Among the jeers and taunts hurled at Saddam as he waited for the trapdoor to open, was the name of Moqtada al-Sadr, the young radical who heads the Mahdi army, the largest Shiite militia and the biggest single winner of the 2005 elections. His bloc had demanded the dictator?s head as its price for rejoining the Maliki coalition.

Maliki gave it to him on Eid al-Adha, or feast of the sacrifice, the holiest Muslim feast day, in the most virulent insult to Sunnis in Iraq and throughout the Islamic world.

Politically, it looks as if the Maliki government no longer intends seriously to pursue the two paths that offered a glimmer of eventual stability: internal reconciliation, above all between Shiite and Sunni, and external co-operation, above all with Sunni neighbours such as Saudi Arabia.

The manner of Saddam?s execution was a clear message to Sunnis in and outside Iraq: that the ruling bloc?s primordial goal is to consolidate the empowerment of the Shiite triggered so carelessly by the Anglo-American invasion in 2003.

ADG Webmaster

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 11645984)

The guy should never have been hanged. It just shows that the people he ruled over are no better than he treated them.

I agree, He should have been tortured and disemboweled without any anesthetic.

Brad

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brad Mitchell (Post 11646016)

I agree, He should have been tortured and disemboweled without any anesthetic.

Brad

Did he ever attack the u.s? No! The u.s.a have always been the ones to attack him the u.s.a supplied him with the weapons to kill the 140+ people he got sentenced to death for killing. The U.S.A also were stilltalking with Iraq at the time this happened in the 80's why was nothing done until now? The truth is america saved this up until they could use it against him. Did he kill anyone on september 11? no! Americans have killed over 300,000 iraqis' and lost over 3000 soliders in Iraq. How many died on september 11? They sure are winning their "War on terror" LOL

Saddam is a scapegoat because they never caught bin laden

No worries he is not dead.

www.SaddamNotDead.com :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scottish Guy (Post 11646092)

none of that has anything to do with why he was killed.. he was killed for ordering the deaths of hundreds of people with no trial.. If america wasn't there saddam would have just been murdered..

Quote:

Originally Posted by who (Post 11645984)

The guy should never have been hanged. It just shows that the people he ruled over are no better than he treated them.

How many tens of thousands of people must someone kill before he should be hung?

Did anyone watch it? I had just seen the pics that were in the news paper.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 11646717)

How many tens of thousands of people must someone kill before he should be hung?

this leaves a lot open for interpretation

many people around the world view things differently.
what we might think is the right thing to do..they villainize us for it.

perspective...

Strange that they tried him for 140 deaths ( of insurgents ) while everybody always refer to the gasing of the Kurds as the main crime...

Makes you wonder ...

If the execution was done inside an enclosed place, then they shouldn't have allowed cellphones inside in the first place.

Fuckinf content thief ....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 11646717)

How many tens of thousands of people must someone kill before he should be hung?

I'm against capital punishment to start with, but with that logic Bush should be swinging from a noose pretty soon.

The man shouldnt of been killed , he should of been tortured everyday 4 the rest of his natural life, like he has done to so many other people and who suffed and r still suffering from what he did under his reign of terror

That is right to say 1ance1ot

Why this man not hanged?! :))))))))

I went to depressed yet