so the .xxx happened at xbiz people lets here it
 

SO what up with the .xxx panel thing at xbiz. Lets here how things went down.

very interested <------

Yeah I would like to know aswell... bump.

:upsidedow

this i find funny:
ASACP Executive Director Joan Irvine, who attended the event, told panelists that her group is ?neutral? on the .XXX proposal, contrary to other reports.

?There is nothing there ? no deals,? she said. ?We have not received any funds [from ICM].?

this is funny from someone who wrote a letter supporting it, remember this when writing asacp checks.

hm, not sure whats so interesting, i dont see there an ICM Registry logo

You are a fucking whiney hairdresser go take your made up tabloid bullshit and go fuck yourself Tony. I sat next to Helmy on the conference and was listening to the comments and disapproval of this .xxx and they were attacked in that room by Xbiz staff and Helmy thunderously applauded every time an opposing point was made against .xxx and Joan Irvine jumped up to let the world know they are not taking money to get the story straight since assholes like you just make up unsubstantiated rumors...and you were not even there you are nothing but a cry baby wanna be...all hype and no substance just a fucking big mouth who talks striaght out of his ass

WE were there... WE were the ones to publicly denounce the effort you are some fuck head at this point who slanders people and couldnt come up with the money or balls to let your voice be heard and you THINK you can spread conspiracy theories and you are simply full of shit I am tired of hearing your lies and ripping people who you know jack shit about...

you are one weak sister in this industry

Lots of bullshit, spin, spin and more spin.

Anyone who attended and thought my comments were over the top, I'm sorry but as Greg said, manure is manure.

I was there, and wrote this fairly extensive account of what took place for YNOT.

There was no way to include everything that was said in the article (it ended up long enough as it is) but I tried to include the most salient points offered by both sides, for the most part in the order that those points were made, and attempted to avoid editorializing/inserting my own bias to the extent possible.

The article includes substantially more of ICM's perspective than do the other accounts of what went on at the seminar that I have read thus far. That fact does not indicate support for .xxx on my part, it is simply a reflection of the proportions of the seminar itself, in which 3 of the 4 panelists were supporters of, or associated with, the ICM proposal.

- Q.

Thanks for the mention :upsidedow

Dickwad that was copied directly from the xbiz article. Learn to read before opening your mouth.

http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=19553 bottom of the article
http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00061.html Her letter,which she talks about :
ASACP has been in negotiations with the International Foundation for Online
Responsibility (IFFOR) and ICM for it to serve as a hotline for reviewing
reports of suspected child pornography and to carry out the secondary
monitoring of .xxx sites for child pornography.
Call me a liar now
If your a man I look forward to your apology

Quentin,

Thank you very much for your report on the seminar. I appreciate your effort as I was not there myself today to attend.

Cheers,

Brad

wow, aren't you mr. cool? oh wait, no, you are mr. jim!

I haven't seen Tony slander or lie once, every single post he makes is intended to get info or spark conversation

instead of insulting and slamming people you don't know, why don't you talk and discuss what is happening? you seem like one of those xbiz folks that flies off the handle for no reason any time a different opinion then theirs shows it head

you gunna post pics of your self with guns now and talk about smashing heads?