Message to Moderators: Remove CP threads please
 

Today there are a couple of very suspect threads that may contain CP related items, I know one for sure has a CP picture in it this thread here:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=726269

The other one if it turns out to be true someone posted a link to a video of a singer molesting a 14 year old girl here:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showthread.php?t=726313

:helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme :helpme

How is a fully clothed child CP? Even a nude child is not necesarily considered cp.

While you're at it, can you please rename the "User CP" link, that's treading on dangerous grounds right there.


Fuck I just lost my own contest.

Dude you didnt see that picture of a NAKED WOMAN spreading her pussy lips and a CHILD right next to her?! Dont be a sicko that is CLEARLY illegal.

You motherfuckers think this is a joke but seriously this isnt funny and people should be extremely careful when posting images and videos that deal with children under 18 on an ADULT PORN WEBMASTER MESSAGE BOARD. :2 cents:

Care to point out the part of the law that's in violation of?

youre a retard

No, actually, we just think you're a joke.

THE WOMAN IS NUDE SPREADING HER PUSSY LIPS IN A SEXUAL POSE NEXT TO A CHILD!!!!!

Dude wtf is wrong with you?

Are you sticking up for CP? Id be VERY careful with your answer in this thread, especially that you run an adult program? Are you fucking kidding me?

No, I was saying that you are a joke, I thought it was quite clear.

Yes thats what I thought now move along this is a serious thread and I am pretty sure you dont want to play in here.

retard,

although what she is doing is wrong and probably an illegal thing to do where she resides... the pic itself is not illegal.

you are without a doubt one of the dumbest and most annoying people to ever post in this forum in recent times. a mindless kid, probably not even 18 trying to boost his own self image by baiting people into moronic discussion and arguments.

good job stirring up unwanted and unneeded fake controversy and attention about illegal content... google appreciates it. stupid fucking jackass.

Yes, everyone is obviously taking this thread, or any of your worthless drivel threads, seriously. Nothing gets by you does it?

Thanks for clarifying what you do and dont think are illegal when it comes to CP, duly noted.
You are seriously retarded if you dont think the feds would come after you for posting a picture like that.

If you dont think CP on an adult webmaster board is serious, I fear for your affiliates.

Are you saying that ISNT a CP image? Choose your words carefully.

That pic is probably at least a year old and has been posted at least 3 other times on here.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

CP on an adult webmaster board, and you being a complete fucking idiot, have nothing to do with each other.

Title 18 of the United States Code governs child pornography. See Chapter 110, Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children. 18 U.S.C. § 2256 defines "Child pornography" as:

"any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer or computer-generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, of sexually explicit conduct, where -
(A) the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(B) such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
(C) such visual depiction has been created, adapted, or modified to appear that an identifiable minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
(D) such visual depiction is advertised, promoted, presented, described, or distributed in such a manner that conveys the impression that the material is or contains a visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct . . ."


Here's the important part since you probably don't understand all the words: "a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct "

That child is appearing in a picture by accident and ENGAGING in sexually explicit conduct.

The woman is in a sexual pose, I cant believe you are defending that CP image Daymon.
You think the feds would agree with your interpretation?

I dont think its something Playboy wants on its servers and I am simply asking the moderators to take a look at those threads for possible CP.

This doesnt concern you and if you would like to argue with TexasDreams about what is and isnt CP be my guest I am just trying to look out for GFY.

How is that child engaging in anything? You're too stupid for words.

This thread needs a fart. Actually many.

:fart :fart :fart :fart

Beat me to it...

You are defending CP images and you call me *stupid*? :error

It's not CP .. I didn't write the laws and I'm sorry you can't understand them, but that doesn't change the facts here.

Says a guy with a website named teeniegirlgalleries.com and lives in Costa Rica. I understand you are trying to be a rebel and say fuck the laws of the United States of America but GFY is NOT the place to be posting images like that and I am pretty sure the mods will agree.

However we can test your theory away from GFY if you want to, just post that image on your website and we shall see who is right.

I'm not trying to be a rebel. I'm just reading the laws which seem pretty clear. Are you really this slow? I mean, it's an act right?

Again if your interpretation of the law is so clear you will have no problem putting that image on your website right? Yeah I didnt think so.

There is not a judge in the world that wouldnt prosecute you for distributing that image.

Daymon, please check yourself before you wreck yourself.

Seriously... na, I doubt it is an act *lol* - just genuinely totally clueless, but with a "need" to attract attention to make up for the character deficiencies :1orglaugh

I'm not going to jump because you tell me to. Really, I don't have to prove to you that you're wrong because you're wrong either way.

Instead, how about you just answer my original question? How is that child engaging in sexual behavior? Really it's a simple question.

The WOMAN IS engaging in sexual behavior.
Dude you are fucking retarded if you think an image of a guy masturbating with a child next to him isnt illegal, frankly you are more than retarded you are fucking sick if you think that image is legal.

So its ok to post it on GFY but not your own website?

Sigh, I don't know why I even argue with you. READ THE LAW. It CLEARLY says of a CHILD engaging. It doesn't say anything about a child appearing in a frame where someone ELSE is engaging in ...

I'll make you a deal. I'll upload it to my server, but when I do you have to start a thread acusing me publically of being a child pornographer. At least that way we can get rid of you around here. Deal?

of course its not, you fucking moron. its a pic of a very irresponsible adult.
stop lowering the IQ of this forum. jesus. seriously. you are totally fucking the curve up for the entire adult industry.

a photo of an illegal act does not constitute an illegal photo.

this forum will be a better place when you mom finally realizes you are posting here and grounds you.

Damn... Splum has obviously overlooked your very fair offer :pimp

ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

he's a master baiter

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Did you expect anything more?

If that were true, you'd go away.

Not a lot! :winkwink:

Splum take a hike you post geek.

geta life splum

Just curious .... but how is the link to the 14 year old getting her dance on with Akon considered CP?

Am I missing something?

If there were laws to cover such a pic, they would pertain to lewd acts in the presence of a minor... not cp..

Please don't tell him that.. he thinks he has a purpose in life.. :)

Wow sure got quiet after my offer.

another moronic splum thread

i mean 50 moronic splum threads