GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Who is Webby? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=726463)

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 07:56 PM

Who is Webby?
 
Please post your thoughts, and your information here. He is always trolling me for attention, so Ill give him some since I have an hour or so to spare.

Who has met him in person, or has pictures of him that are confirmed?

Mr.Right - Banned For Life 04-21-2007 08:02 PM

http://www.iloveknights.com/images/ewok_mondays.jpg

Juicy D. Links 04-21-2007 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batts (Post 12292388)

that looks like Pete


http://www.mccullagh.org/db9/d30-3/iguana-closeup.jpg

Ray@TastyDollars 04-21-2007 08:03 PM

He is one of the smartest guys in the biz

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batts (Post 12292388)

Very much as I pictured him, except I saw him with a pipe, and a safari hat...

DaddyHalbucks 04-21-2007 08:04 PM

He sure thinks he is smart.

Splum 04-21-2007 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ray@TastyDollars (Post 12292397)
He is one of the smartest guys in the biz

Do tell?

uno 04-21-2007 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Juicy D. Links (Post 12292390)
that looks like Pete

:1orglaugh

Webby 04-21-2007 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292379)
Please post your thoughts, and your information here. He is always trolling me for attention, so Ill give him some since I have an hour or so to spare.

Who has met him in person, or has pictures of him that are confirmed?

No, no no - never claim Webby is ever trolling you for "attention" :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

You are just too stupid to comment upon - look at your threads idiot! :pimp

fuzebox 04-21-2007 08:07 PM

Webby is smart and knows his shit :thumbsup

You guys are your politics is pretty fucking annoying though, from both sides.

Sly 04-21-2007 08:07 PM

2 1/4 cups all-purpose flour

1 teaspoon baking soda

1 teaspoon salt

1 cup (2 sticks, 1/2 pound) butter, softened

3/4 cup granulated [white] sugar

3/4 cup packed brown sugar

1 teaspoon vanilla extract

2 eggs

2 cups (12-ounce package) NESTLE TOLL HOUSE Semi-Sweet Chocolate Morsels

1 cup chopped nuts

COMBINE flour, baking soda and salt in small bowl. Beat butter, granulated sugar, brown sugar and vanilla in large mixer bowl. Add eggs one at a time, beating well after each addition; gradually beat in flour mixture. Stir in morsels and nuts. Drop by rounded tablespoon onto ungreased baking sheets.

BAKE in preheated 375-degree [Fahrenheit] oven for 9 to 11 minutes or until golden brown. Let stand for 2 minutes; remove to wire racks to cool completely.

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyHalbucks (Post 12292402)
He sure thinks he is smart.

He reminds me of the joke about the city slicker hunter that shoots the duck and it lands on a farmers property. The farmer refuses to give the duck to the hunter, but tells him there is a way to settle it. The city slicker asks for details in order to resolve the situation. The farmer explains well what we do around here is we take turns kicking each other in the groin, and whoever gives up first is the loser of the disagreement. The city slicker thinks it over and agrees. The farmer explains that since its his land he gets to go first. He draws back his foot and with all his might wails the city slicker in the nuts. He falls to the floor in terrible pain. He takes about 5 minutes to gather himself backup, and says ok, its my turn. The farmer then says.. Its ok, you can have the duck...

Mr.Right - Banned For Life 04-21-2007 08:09 PM

http://www.iloveknights.com/images/ewok_mondays.jpg

aico 04-21-2007 08:12 PM

One of the smartest guys on GFY who makes you look like a fool on many occasions, which is by no means a challenge.

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292424)
One of the smartest guys on GFY who makes you look like a fool on many occasions, which is by no means a challenge.

Does he know how you think HD video cant be NTSC though? lol :1orglaugh

yota71 04-21-2007 08:15 PM

Those who are able to look at the whole picture (Webby) are often misunderstood by others following a selected path.

aico 04-21-2007 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292425)
Does he know how you think HD video cant be NTSC though? lol :1orglaugh

Find where I ever said that and I'll give you $1,000 USD. Typical Republican, making up facts.

Webby 04-21-2007 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292425)
Does he know how you think HD video cant be NTSC though? lol :1orglaugh

Gawd... you are too dumb to even realize how pathetic you are. Still on your one-track dumbo braincell trying to deride people???? You want more pins stuck in your ass??? :1orglaugh :1orglaugh Behave idiot!

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292436)
Find where I ever said that and I'll give you $1,000 USD. Typical Republican, making up facts.

Epass rkingston


http://www.gfy.com/11946304-post55.html

You said NTSC is 29.97 fps only. Which is categorically false. By saying that you are saying any HD video not at 29.97 is unable to be NTSC

This going to be another Ebus_Dk backout now, or will you try to find some loophole?

aico 04-21-2007 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292444)
Epass rkingston


http://www.gfy.com/11946304-post55.html

You said NTSC is 29.97 fps only. Which is categorically false. By saying that you are saying any HD video not at 29.97 is unable to be NTSC

This going to be another Ebus_Dk backout now, or will you try to find some loophole?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

And you edit video???? NTSC is 29.97 fps you fucking retard. God you never cease to amaze me how fucking stupid you are...

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292425)
Does he know how you think HD video cant be NTSC though? lol :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292436)
Find where I ever said that and I'll give you $1,000 USD. Typical Republican, making up facts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292452)
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

And you edit video???? NTSC is 29.97 fps you fucking retard. God you never cease to amaze me how fucking stupid you are...

Ok Epass is rkingston

So you are saying AGAIN that HD cannot be NTSC, and in the first quote you said this!


Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292436)
Find where I ever said that and I'll give you $1,000 USD. Typical Republican, making up facts.

After I said this

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292425)
Does he know how you think HD video cant be NTSC though? lol :1orglaugh

Epass Rkingston 1000.00 please thanks.

So Im unsure are you saying HD video can or cannot be NTSC, and are you saying that NTSC cannot be anything other than 29.97?

aico 04-21-2007 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292492)
Ok Epass is rkingston

So you are saying AGAIN that HD cannot be NTSC, and in the first quote you said this!




After I said this



Epass Rkingston 1000.00 please thanks.

So Im unsure are you saying HD video can or cannot be NTSC, and are you saying that NTSC cannot be anything other than 29.97?

Do you even know what HD is? It has nothing to do with the frame rate. You'd think someone who tries to get work in the video field would know 1 or 2 of the most basic principles.

It's kind of scary how stupid you are actually.

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292498)
Do you even know what HD is? It has nothing to do with the frame rate. You'd think someone who tries to get work in the video field would know 1 or 2 of the most basic principles.

It's kind of scary how stupid you are actually.

So first you said you never said that NTSC couldnt be HD, then you said NTSC can ONLY be 29.97. Do we need to get into pull downs, interlacing, re-interleaving, progressive etc?

So you are saying HD cannot be NTSC correct?

aico 04-21-2007 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292513)
So first you said you never said that NTSC couldnt be HD, then you said NTSC can ONLY be 29.97. Do we need to get into pull downs, interlacing, re-interleaving, progressive etc?

So you are saying HD cannot be NTSC correct?

No, actually first I said NTSC is 29.95, which it is, and it always will be, even if you are too stupid to know jack shit about video standards. And, I never said HD could not be NTSC, because that is fucking retarded. HD has NOTHING to do with frame rate.

You really are a moron, you should be paying me for teaching you.

Barefootsies 04-21-2007 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292379)
Who is Webby?

He is a chap who knows a great deal about this industry.

:2 cents:

Splum 04-21-2007 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barefootsies (Post 12292527)
He is a chap who knows a great deal about this industry. :2 cents:

Do tell.

WarChild 04-21-2007 08:55 PM

Administered by the FCC, NTSC broadcasts 60 half frames per second, which is known as 60 "fields" per second in TV jargon (59.94 fields per second to be exact). NTSC uses 525 lines of resolution: the first 480 lines in each frame are the image, and the last 45 are the "vertical blanking interval" (VBI), which was designed to give the electron gun time to reposition itself from the bottom of the last frame to the top of the next.

So how can NTSC be other than 29.95 frames?!?

aico 04-21-2007 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 12292537)
So how can NTSC be other than 29.95 frames?!?

It can't, and it isn't. But this fucktard video guy has no clue, so he thinks that because you can change the frame rate of video in Premiere to whatever you want, it must still be NTSC... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292522)
No, actually first I said NTSC is 29.95, which it is, and it always will be, even if you are too stupid to know jack shit about video standards. And, I never said HD could not be NTSC, because that is fucking retarded. HD has NOTHING to do with frame rate.

You really are a moron, you should be paying me for teaching you.

So can HD be NTSC or not?

WarChild 04-21-2007 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292557)
So can HD be NTSC or not?

Looks to me like he said NTSC has to be 29.95 frames per second. He never said HD couldn't be 29.95 frames per second. It was you that said NTSC having to be 29.95 was "categorically false".

aico 04-21-2007 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292557)
So can HD be NTSC or not?

LMAO, you are such an idiot. You really don't even know what HD is do you? HD can be NTSC and PAL, IT HAS NOTHING FUCKING AT ALL TO DO WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING FRAME RATE YOU STUPID FUCKING IDIOT, PULL YOUR GOD DAMN HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS!

Webby 04-21-2007 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 12292567)
Looks to me like he said NTSC has to be 29.95 frames per second. He never said HD couldn't be 29.95 frames per second. It was you that said NTSC having to be 29.95 was "categorically false".

Hang on there - that is FAR to much for one braincell to absorb :1orglaugh The braincell needs to find an angle on come back and post another stupid question :winkwink:

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WarChild (Post 12292567)
Looks to me like he said NTSC has to be 29.95 frames per second. He never said HD couldn't be 29.95 frames per second. It was you that said NTSC having to be 29.95 was "categorically false".

Yup and I am categorically correct.

Quote:

Interlacing
Above I stated that the frame rate of NTSC was 29.97 fps. Well, in a way, that was a lie. In fact, there is no such thing as a frame in NTSC video. NTSC is made up of fields, not frames. A field is made up of every other horizontal scanline. One field contains all the odd numbered scanlines, then the next field will contain all the even numbered scanlines. A frame is actually just two consecutive fields viewed at the same time. This process is called interlacing.

Therefore, NTSC actually runs at 59.94 fields per second (again, this figure is often simplified as 60 fields per second). A common misconception is that frames are recorded and then split into fields, while in fact it is fields that are recorded and then combined into frames. This is important because it means that a still NTSC frame is not actually "still." There is a temporal difference of 1/60th of a second between fields, so in fact half of the frame's scanlines were recorded 1/60th of a second after the other half. Most of the times, this time difference is so small as to not be noticeable so the frame looks like a still. However, in some cases with very fast action or when very fine details appear in one field but not another, artifacts of the interlacing can be seen.

Some digital cameras now offer progressive scan, in which the camera records all the scanlines in a frame sequentially, creating entire frames rather than interlaced fields. This is helpful if the video is meant to be viewed on a computer or a projector, both of which display video in a similar progressive fashion and on whom interlacing can be even more noticeable. However, all analog TVs display fields, meaning that even video recorded progressively will be interlaced.

In case you are curious, the reason NTSC is interlaced in the first place is that when the standard was agreed upon way back in the 50's, the phosphers used on television screens were not good at maintaining their brightness. If the image was shown progressively, by the time the scanlines at the bottom of a frame were being drawn, the top of the image had already begun to fade. When displayed at 30fps, this created a flickering image that was unwatchable. By only redrawing half the scanlines at a time, the image could be refreshed before it had begun to fade.

theking 04-21-2007 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292379)
Please post your thoughts, and your information here. He is always trolling me for attention, so Ill give him some since I have an hour or so to spare.

Who has met him in person, or has pictures of him that are confirmed?

He hates the American President. He hates the American Goverment. He hates the American people. He hates America. He has called for the assassination of the President...multiple times. He has offered his services to personally assassinate the President. He also is one of the biggest liars on GFY. He is pigshit.

aico 04-21-2007 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292588)
Yup and I am categorically correct.

Try and guess what 1/2 of 59.94 is you fucking jackass... god you are stupid.

Webby 04-21-2007 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 12292597)
He hates the American President. He hates the American Goverment. He hates the American people. He hates America. blah

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I used to laugh even more with Pathfinders posts - but sorry old man, time to just ignore the woodworm and infestation :thumbsup

notabook 04-21-2007 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292601)
Try and guess what 1/2 of 59.94 is you fucking jackass... god you are stupid.

Is it 17? :upsidedow

aico 04-21-2007 09:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook (Post 12292607)
Is it 17? :upsidedow

I think it's HD.

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292572)
LMAO, you are such an idiot. You really don't even know what HD is do you? HD can be NTSC and PAL, IT HAS NOTHING FUCKING AT ALL TO DO WITH THE GOD DAMN FUCKING FRAME RATE YOU STUPID FUCKING IDIOT, PULL YOUR GOD DAMN HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS!

Really? NOTHING? hmm

Unlike SDTV, which has only one broadcast standard in the United States, eighteen digital options exist within the new U.S. DTV/HDTV standards.

Although it might seem these many different approaches would represent chaos, experts expect TV tuners will be able to sort them out automatically.

To recap, the standards vary in the following three ways.

* Active lines of resolution: 1,080 and 720 for HDTV; only 480 for SDTV (As we've noted, active lines differ slightly from total line figures, since we can't see some of the latter.)

* Types of scanning: Interlaced (two fields, each consisting of half the lines merge to make one complete frame or picture), and progressive (all lines transmit together without interlacing). Recall we covered this concept here.

* Scan rate: 60 or 50 fields per second for interlaced, 30 or 25 frames per second for progressive, and 24 frames per second for film-style progressive scan.

We now widely use 24 fps in high-definition video production -- especially when a need exists to convert the results to film. Attack of the Clones, the Star Wars film release of 2002, was one of the first "films" done on 24-progressive video and then converted to film. Since that time, numerous other films have used the same technique.


So you are saying HD can be HD regardless of its frame rate hmmmm interesting. If it has NOTHING to do with framerate...

Hey can I encode HD at something other than H.264 while we are at it? Is that possible oh video wizard.. lol :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

RyuLion 04-21-2007 09:18 PM

Move on..there's nothing to see here..

theking 04-21-2007 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12292606)
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I used to laugh even more with Pathfinders posts - but sorry old man, time to just ignore the woodworm and infestation :thumbsup

You never do.

Some one above posted that you know your shit and you do...pigshit that is.

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 09:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12292606)
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

I used to laugh even more with Pathfinders posts - but sorry old man, time to just ignore the woodworm and infestation :thumbsup

Who are you again, and what do you do? Other than relay to us your "words of wisdom" :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Webby 04-21-2007 09:19 PM

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Awesome!!!!!!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

God help us!!!! *lol*

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Webby (Post 12292622)
:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Awesome!!!!!!! :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

God help us!!!! *lol*

Ahh a leader of the industry I forgot... And now you evade law officials from your country of origin.. Interesting.

aico 04-21-2007 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292614)
Really? NOTHING? hmm

Unlike SDTV, which has only one broadcast standard in the United States, eighteen digital options exist within the new U.S. DTV/HDTV standards.

Although it might seem these many different approaches would represent chaos, experts expect TV tuners will be able to sort them out automatically.

To recap, the standards vary in the following three ways.

* Active lines of resolution: 1,080 and 720 for HDTV; only 480 for SDTV (As we've noted, active lines differ slightly from total line figures, since we can't see some of the latter.)

* Types of scanning: Interlaced (two fields, each consisting of half the lines merge to make one complete frame or picture), and progressive (all lines transmit together without interlacing). Recall we covered this concept here.

* Scan rate: 60 or 50 fields per second for interlaced, 30 or 25 frames per second for progressive, and 24 frames per second for film-style progressive scan.

We now widely use 24 fps in high-definition video production -- especially when a need exists to convert the results to film. Attack of the Clones, the Star Wars film release of 2002, was one of the first "films" done on 24-progressive video and then converted to film. Since that time, numerous other films have used the same technique.


So you are saying HD can be HD regardless of its frame rate hmmmm interesting. If it has NOTHING to do with framerate...

Hey can I encode HD at something other than H.264 while we are at it? Is that possible oh video wizard.. lol :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Congratulations on pointing out that you have no clue about the difference in frame (oh sorry, Field) rate and Lines of Resolution... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 09:23 PM

Alright I got a shoot to catpure and edit. Let me know if anyone can tell us what Webby ACTUALLY does, or who he actually is. Other than the standard fair of Oh he is so smart, and he knows his shit routine. If he is such a big shot, then Im sure someone can tell us what he does, what adult sites or businesses he runs, and who has personally met him.

aico 04-21-2007 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292630)
Alright I got a shoot to catpure and edit. Let me know if anyone can tell us what Webby ACTUALLY does, or who he actually is. Other than the standard fair of Oh he is so smart, and he knows his shit routine. If he is such a big shot, then Im sure someone can tell us what he does, what adult sites or businesses he runs, and who has personally met him.

Why don't you tell us what you do, because after reading your responses here, I have a really hard time believing it has anything at all to do with video.

Webby 04-21-2007 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stickyfingerz (Post 12292620)
Who are you again, and what do you do?

Moi??? :1orglaugh A total mystery to a 30 something kid stuck in TN who has no clue on when to shut the fuck up :pimp

Carry on - show your expertise in video messing and cherry pick elements that suit your dumb brain :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

stickyfingerz 04-21-2007 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aico (Post 12292624)
Congratulations on pointing out that you have no clue about the difference in frame (oh sorry, Field) rate and Lines of Resolution... :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Would you like to claim you did not say "framerate makes has nothing to do with HD: ?

Sly 04-21-2007 09:27 PM

I met Webby last year in Costa Rica. Nice enough guy. He shook my hand and bought me a drink. Gave me some great tips on improving conversions on SE traffic and grilling fine steaks.

Case closed.

I don't know shit about fields or frames, seems like a dumb thing to argue about though unless you're a member of the AV club.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123