Danish schoolgirls striptease: 2257 violation?
 

Yes or No?

http://blog.tv2.dk/blogzilla/entry94529.html

2257 has nothing to do with "Danish schoolgirls" - it's up to them what nonsense they get up to (tho parents may have an opinion as well :winkwink: ) :pimp

Meanwhile.. back to the main source of the problem - just been hearing how roughly 50 - 60% of CP on the internet is actually on US servers. Hell.. I thought that was the purpose of 2257 - to reduce underage sex-orientated content??? 2257 must be working well ....

I want my money back.

It's from Denmark, on a Danish domain and probably on a foreign server... I can't see how that would be subject to US law.

CP producers dont put a 2257 statement on their work , they dont keep records. 2257 was meant to harass honest law abiding porno people basically.

My understanding is that all these girls are 18+ but it happened in a school.

Can't confirm it 100% though. I'm sure a danish fellow gfy'er will be able to confirm this.

Ad nogen perverse gamle mennesker i er. få jer et liv i stedet for at glo på piger uden tøj på. har i ikke nogen respekt i livet, er jeres liv blottet for indhold. gamle perverse mennesker, få jer et job, så har I i det mindste noget at lave !!!!!

Uhhhhh.... it's a US law...

Doesn't matter. Like uno pointed out, the Danes aren't subject to US laws.

What school was that???

You said it exactly Tony - all bollocks and agree :thumbsup

It's not exactly "normal" for purveyors of CP to bother about the nice 2257 statements :winkwink:

Ich wußte nicht, daß sie gelbe Penisse in Dänemark hatten?

No? They are green, not yellow - must be your monitor color balance :winkwink:

What the fuck!!!???!! Kan du dansk eller har du bare quoted et eller andet?

Det lyder som om en eller anden har pisset på hans sukkermad ihvertfald ;)

The purpose of 2257 is to FUCK with legal adult operations.

it's all because of that Justin Timberlake's song :P

does 2257 cover linking to foreign stuff? or is it only in regard to hosting? how about embedded, if the video was to be embedded onto a forum like this one, would that cause any trouble?

No 2257 was meant to keep your ass out of jail. If they need a law to make you realise publishing porn has responsibilities then good.

The idea that you can publish porn without 2257 documents is beyond stupid.

Yes the cross referencing is a pain, but do you think you can just point to a filing cabinet and tell the police, "The girls IDs are in there"?

The job of the government is to protect under age people getting into porn, not make it easy for you to publish it and absolve you from your responsibilities.

Remember the tougher 2257 is the more companies that close down. does not stop surfers buying porn. Comply and pick up the extra business.

nice asses....

hmmn...couldn't even understand the comments and texts in that page...

hot chicks! too bad those girls (and fags) are gonna be subject to a steep suspension i'd assume hehe

damn, I went to the wrong school!

Actually the teachers were in the first row.