Soooo.. Was WTC 7 brought down by the gov or did it collapse??
 

I tend to be sceptical about everything and nothing is really out of the realm of possibility in my mind... I've read some of the conspiracy things and agree that come of it can be just based on confusion of the moment, mis-statements etc. and so I don't give it much weight.. However, Kerry makes a pretty clear and consice statement regarding WTC 7 here

https://youtube.com/watch?v=P3V9G...lated&search=#

about 4 minutes in.

Stumbled accross that and a few other related things and it's looking pretty clear that what happened to WTC 7 has been lied about. At the very least, it's looking like they brought it down, maybe for safety reasons, I don't know.. but why lie about it...

spotting....

Read this, it has a lot of good info:

http://wtc7lies.googlepages.com/introduction

just parking my sig....

Was that event allowed to justify war in the east. Lots of conspiracy who knows.

theres gonna be conspiracy theories bout everything, who fuckin knows, best not to dwell on it

although i have watched those documentaries and shit, some are pretty fucked up and disturbing, but as always take it with a grain of salt. some ppl will die tryin to convince you that bigfoot and aliens anal probed them

Interesting... But like all of these sites (on both sites) etc., he tends to use similar but not exact information to make his point...

For example, one of the things about it coming down is the "pull it" statement by Larry Silverstein.. The part about that term not being used to refer to explosives is plausible.. but it does also indicate that the term is used by demolition people for pulling down something (which is what the Kerry statement appears to be saying as well)... If you apply the "confused statements" excuse to what Larry said, not being a demolition person, it's possible he was refering to demolition.

Regardless, that site then goes on to give multiple instances where "pull" is used by firefighters to refer to "retreating" from an area. But of all the examples he gives as "proof", I couldn't find one that was used in the exact same context as the Larry statement... Given that's a pretty important (and simple) thing, it leads me to be sceptical of pretty much anything that he might have to say as it makes it appear that he is also twisting information for his own purpose.

I wish there was a site out there that was actually put together by someone intelligent and with only truth as the agenda.