About little lupe
 

Worldsex/AL4A do not accept little lupe galleries:Oh crap

I'm sorry but your gallery submission to al4a.com has been declined.

Decline Reason: she doesn't look like 18

Your submission information
URL: http://www.sexabulous.com/galleries/...le-lupe26.html


Thank You,
~TEAM AL4A~

Crazy !

I see loads of models who probably "don't look 18", but that doesn't mean to say they aren't...

You must be smoking some good :rasta she's totally made up to look like she's 12 years old.

WTF thats stupid imho

their site, their rules

for me she looks 18, but yup that's their site!

the fact is that a paid submit account at wordsex cost over 100$ Canadians a mouth andmost of the gallery finished in the category listing and only one out 6-8 galleries reach the front page:Oh crap

Try submitting a gallery of her with a big fat cock up her ass, that might convince them that she's 18+ because, come on seriously, which 12yo does have a big fat cock up her ass???!!!

there are lots of people who want nothing to do with her,
do all of their galleries have watermarks like that too?

Hahaha, Worldsex/AL4A have their own Teen Revenue account and they advertise Little Lupe via this account themselves.

Today there is this gallery listed http://galleries.littlelupe.com/0059...o/11/index.php with "Teen Loves Cock" as description right on worldsex.com

LOL that's funny :love2suck

i dont like their rules

LOL, nice way to do the business however :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

good decline reason

lolllllllllll

True, but this one looks like 14 y/o !!

well, she doesn't look 18 because she's really not 18 years old yet...she's around 14 or 15

...and the ol' conflict of interest trumps you ALL!!!

Are you retarded? They should ban you for just saying that shit btw.

uh oh this thread now has a potential of blowing up

obviously a reviewer that had no idea what is going on

Lol I love the Hypocrisy that surrounds the little lupe site. All these people with porn morals haha. The girl is 20. Its obvious to me she is overage. Ive seen way way worse examples on tgp thumbs over the years.

Dugmor needs to put a fuckin chain on you. That is completely false and you are accusing a sponsor of cp. You should be banned period.

You work for a program that fucks 18 year old pregnant girls in the ass, and fish hooks them. Seriously..

btw she is 20

I smell a banning coming

Its the second time she has said that too. :disgust

If her papers are allright..she is legal

Still, could have been worse; they could have replied with:
http://www.bobmaster.hu/denied.jpg

her age doesn't matter except whether it is legal or not....these kinda sites
cater the same pedophiles you all claim to dispise. talk about hypocrisy

You are a fucking idiot. And yeah, Dugmore should put a muzzle on you.

Hmm except pedophiles would not be interested in that site.

As long as they got id, they look 18 to me! :)

She looks like 19

C..L..U..E..

FIND ONE

a shame on many levels if that is true about AL4A/Worldsex

Nobody from their ended contacted me.

ya right and that's why there's sites like these...the hardcore pedos might skip
these sites but there's a huge amount of people drawn to these sites which I
wouldn't like to have around my children.

I'm not talking about this lupe site in particular I'm talking about all teeny sites
where girls are being displayed as minors....they are targeted towards the 45+
audience in particular.

I have worked many years for a company that also ran these teeny sites
so spare me the defense arguments as I know first hand how they work
and what audience buys memberships to these sites.

It's for a reason why they are dressed up like what the audience thinks
represents teenies. You never see 18 year old girls on the street with huge
cotton pastel coloured tent size panties. Or encounter girl bday parties where
a bunch of 18 year old play twister and other silly games wearing shool uniforms......and god knows I've searched for it to make sure I'm just not
hanging around the wrong people. :winkwink:

That said of course it's a business and it's a good market if you address
the niche correctly. I have no problem with that I just get annoyed whenever
people running these sites try to convince everyone of their ethical morals

:thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Sorry, a bit offtopic, but you should check the grammar and spelling on your gallery, TTiger:
"She don't just masterbate, She have sex with boys and girls!!"

Well said! :thumbsup

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh Welcome to the world of business.

lol reply of the year.....shes 20 get a clue
no idiot in the right mind would make site if she was under the legal age

I'm not sure of the reasons for banning Little Lupe on AL4A and/or Worldsex.
I'd appreciate a note from them explaining.

Other huge portals are doing serious number$ with her.

Lol, solid reason they gave you. Man I went out last night an ran into a girl that really but really looked like she was 16 years old, but it turned out she was 21. Think there are a lot of girls that look underage. People just like young and innocent look.

Couldn't agree more.

And I also agree that she doesn't look 18.

:2 cents:

Agree SG - It's a matter of judgement and avoiding a "state of denial". It's prob true there is little valid judgement/experience around and the "state of denial" is often from promoters with a vested interest.

The acid test could be "Can you stand in front of a jury and convince them that these kind of sites don't cater to the pedo market?" Fat chance.

WorldSex applied the "looks like" test (tho they may have screwed up on sponsor links) and that is their right. Several other established sites apply the same test - it's not just about whether "whatever" is legal. It's about judgement to publish.

How would you know that?? lol

You gotta be careful what you say, you will get yourself in alot of trouble :2 cents:

if that's what 12 year olds look like these days that's news to me. ya, there may be a few small things in the setup/look of her and the room that appears young, but 12 years old?? LMAO! That actually makes me laugh.

apparently its not just beauty thats in the eye of the beholder - its also the imagined 2257 records.

anyone can check and find out shes of legal age - but that is never good enough for webmasters and whoever looks at her. She is going to be judged simply because she has a young looking face... thats it. Alot of self righteous people out there that even when presented with facts - they still go ape-shit then start pointing fingers and call everyone 'pedo'. Companies such as this are not going to be stupid enough to promote someone underage

Robert you are also the voice of reason. :thumbsup

Agree it is exactly the case Robert that Lupe, least in these circumstances, is going to be judged because she "looks young" - plus the many other obvious "styling" elements which must have happened by accident to make her look even younger :)

Doubt the issue is over whether she is of age. Of course Lupe is 20 whatever and it is assumed the US domestic law records are in order. (Tho the legal standards of the US do not neccessary apply in other prime wired countries where they may have more stringent laws.)

Totally agree with you in that the attention these kinds of sites get in the adult industry is not usually over whether she is legal in the US or not, but because she is young looking - plus the blantantly obvious scenario overall and the undesireable appeal this may have.

There never was a law which stated - "You shalt publish anything which is termed legal". Webmasters are no different to media editors - we are all responsible for published content and, ultimately, this is a matter of judgement. Sure, that judgement may involve legal issues, but it extends further than that - and always has.

WorldSex are using their judgement in this instance. They know the usual legal formalities are probably in order, but elected not to publish under the "looks young" test. Several other established websites/sponsors use exactly the same test. This is not new or connected with "hypocrisy".

The fact that these type of sites even create any kind of contraversy within the adult industry - forget any "public opinion" - may be a clue something may be wrong.

People are talking about Little Lupe so much because she's blowing up in popularity. As a person that promotes solo girls a lot, I can think of many girls off the top of my head that look more "childish" (and I'm sure they're not either - just posed that way a bit). In fact in my eyes, she's definitely not even the youngest looking Teen Revenue girl.