GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   If Pasis Hilton was anyone else... (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=740538)

xxxjay 06-07-2007 06:40 PM

If Pasis Hilton was anyone else...
 
She would be locked up for a long ass time. Probation violations are no joke!

Donkey Punch 06-07-2007 06:43 PM

If Pasis Hilton were anyone else she'd probably be Paris Hilton


lol jk yeah she'd be outta here like 3 strikes at a baseball game.

needlive 06-07-2007 07:41 PM

I love her. So sweet. (lol)

Spunky 06-07-2007 07:41 PM

Celebrity justice..what a fucking joke

munki 06-07-2007 07:47 PM

Just from reading around a bit, not taking sides on this fucking retarded issue... but aren't most nonviolent offenders being released after serving 10% of sentences because of overcrowding in CA?

So if she was anybody else... she probably would have gotten out anyways... just quietly?

WiredGuy 06-07-2007 07:47 PM

I've never seen anyone be released from prison because the food wasn't to their standards. What a joke. Eat the shit and serve the sentence bitch!
WG

Pornwolf 06-07-2007 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 12564877)
I've never seen anyone be released from prison because the food wasn't to their standards. What a joke. Eat the shit and serve the sentence bitch!
WG


I agree. This really shits on the system. All the people that are sitting in jail for lesser offenses... or the same offense should be released as well.

I can't believe this happened.

seeric 06-07-2007 07:56 PM

i'd hit it from here to texas and back.


however i was really embarrassed to be a californian today. total system breakdown. i can't believe there are no riots yet.

Achmed 06-07-2007 08:11 PM

do you like falafel mr. jay?

Daruma 06-07-2007 08:15 PM

I predict that after the court hearing tomorrow morning - she'll be headed back - I just kinda hope that its for the full 45 days this time..

Huggles 06-07-2007 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WiredGuy (Post 12564877)
I've never seen anyone be released from prison because the food wasn't to their standards. What a joke. Eat the shit and serve the sentence bitch!
WG

:thumbsup

tony286 06-07-2007 09:45 PM

Rich people arent everyone else.

Iron Fist 06-07-2007 09:47 PM

If Paris Hilton was anyone else, she would already be a worn out hooker in the ditch.

Don't ask, I have no idea why hearing that name or seeing her pics brings out the best in me.

spunkmaster 06-07-2007 11:07 PM

There was a story on TV about a black guy in that jail who shot someone and he only served one month out of the 5 years he got !

The guy he shot was a guy he met in the same jail for doing the same thing last year :)

If Paris served 3 days out of 40 it sounds about right ?

fuzebox 06-07-2007 11:27 PM

Well yes, but if she was anyone other than Paris Hilton, would she have gotten jail time? Seems a lot of people are getting slaps on the wrist for far worse infractions these days.

TampaToker 06-08-2007 12:51 AM

lol i violated probation in 89 here in florida and they dont play. You violate no bond no nothing you locked up to sentence time....

bDok 06-08-2007 12:59 AM

so fucking lame. all i know is. money=power.

SleazyDream 06-08-2007 01:02 AM

i'm betting not much food was eaten in prison across the USA last two days and not much will be eaten for the next week or two LOL

she probally did more for prison BUDGETS than anyone knows - less food consumed means less expense. the amount of hunger striked will SOAR!!!

THANK YOU PARIS

zeruel 06-08-2007 01:20 AM

if Paris Hilton was anyone else... she's still hot and damn pretty! :winkwink:

xxxjay 06-08-2007 03:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TampaToker (Post 12566053)
lol i violated probation in 89 here in florida and they dont play. You violate no bond no nothing you locked up to sentence time....

That's totally true. I know this from personal experience myself.

The fact that she even stayed out of jail till her court date amazes me. You lose all your rights when you take probation over a jail sentence.

Knowing what I know now, I'd way rather take a short stint in jail over a long sentence on probation. If the probation department plays the tune, you had better dance!

Kimo 06-08-2007 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 12566392)
I'd way rather take a short stint in jail over a long sentence on probation. If the probation department plays the tune, you had better dance!



Quoted for truth.

testpie 06-08-2007 05:27 AM

It's shitty that she can just buy her way out of the justice system, but never forget:

She can't buy her way out of death no matter how rich she is. :2 cents:

Sexxxy Sites 06-08-2007 06:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 12564571)
She would be locked up for a long ass time. Probation violations are no joke!

Bullshit. She was on summary probation which means she was not assigned a probation officer and did not have to report to anyone. It also means that, under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one is not violated unless it is for an identical offense. In her case that would be a second DUI during the term of probation, which she did not have.

She apparently was stoped on two occasions with a suspended license and under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one would have paid a fine on the first offense, and possibly, just possibly, one would have been sentenced to, possibly, just possibly up to 72 hours in jail, to be served at the discretion of the Sheriff depending upon jail crowding. Most, if not all jails in California are grossly overcrowed.

The judge in her case was out of line in her sentencing and if he overrides the decision of the Sheriff to place her under home arrest he will be out of line yet once again.

She is a celebrity but she should not be treated differently than the average person would be and yet she has been. She has been treated worse because of her celebrity and was actually placed in maximum security (solitary confinement for her own protection) which is harsh and is usually reserved for problem inmates.

jdc 06-08-2007 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by needlive (Post 12564852)
I love her. So sweet. (lol)

i agree! she's damn hot!

alby_persignup 06-08-2007 06:28 AM

if she was anyone else maybe she's one of the big time porn star :pimp

gmr324 06-08-2007 07:12 AM

I can't believe they interrupted news on the G8
summit to talk about Paris Hilton. Great priorities
the media has.

ContentSHOOTER 06-08-2007 07:49 AM

With all the embarrassment this "IDIOTIC BITCH" has caused to the business end of the HILTON name, she should disinherited:2 cents::thumbsup

Daruma 06-08-2007 07:57 AM

NEW TWIST:: just announced that she'll only be allowed to appear in court via telephone this morning...

D 06-08-2007 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12566800)
Bullshit. She was on summary probation which means she was not assigned a probation officer and did not have to report to anyone. It also means that, under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one is not violated unless it is for an identical offense. In her case that would be a second DUI during the term of probation, which she did not have.

You may be right on the summary probation thing - I dunno. Ever consider she received this slap on the wrist in the first place because of her status? It seems she was given plenty of preferential treatment in the past - reflected by the fact that she seems to be the first person released from sheriff's custody due to "medical problems."

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12566800)
She apparently was stoped on two occasions with a suspended license and under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one would have paid a fine on the first offense, and possibly, just possibly, one would have been sentenced to, possibly, just possibly up to 72 hours in jail, to be served at the discretion of the Sheriff depending upon jail crowding. Most, if not all jails in California are grossly overcrowed.

I know someone who went to jail for his first offense of driving with a suspended liscence (actually he had just parked his car) off Sunset. No other crimes were in the process of being committed - including wreckless driving or break of probation.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12566800)
The judge in her case was out of line in her sentencing

I think that's very debatable. To me, it simply seems he noticed someone that considered herself impervious to the system, and so saught the maximum he could under the law in an effort to impart onto her that she wasn't. As an Angelino with something very personal at stake in this matter (as I've expressed a couple times now), I, for one, would not have felt she would have been reformed with a simple anklet for a few weeks.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12566800)
and if he overrides the decision of the Sheriff to place her under home arrest he will be out of line yet once again.

What country are you from again? Nazi Germany? Imperial Rome?

We have this thing called constitutional cgovernment in the U.S. It's the job of the judiciary to interpret law. It's the job of the executive (e.g. the sheriff's office) to execute those interpretations. I know most Americans have fogotten this facet of the way things work here in the last 7 years - but , I assure you, it's still the basis of our State Governments, at least.

D 06-08-2007 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daruma (Post 12567255)
NEW TWIST:: just announced that she'll only be allowed to appear in court via telephone this morning...

Seems that was Paris's idea, and not the judge's.

Anyone still thinking she's learned her lesson here?

The judge said he wasn't going to have any of that, and has sent a car to pick her up.

ClimaxXx 06-08-2007 09:25 AM

Apparently painting the jail bars like penises didn't make her feel at home, at all... Poor girl... I hope she didn't hurt her teeth on them...

Ah, I love Sarah Silverman... Those who caught the highlights of the MTV Video Awards know what I'm talking about... haha

xXx

rapmaster 06-08-2007 09:28 AM

we will know very soon.. I bet she goes to jail

Ravage 06-08-2007 09:32 AM

She's been caught a couple times already for driving with a suspended license. I believe this was her 3rd offense to it, and thus it goes to court for sentencing. Michelle Rodriguez only served a handful of hours in her sentence that was to be 10 days in jail.

For similar offenses, she has served what normal people serve behind bars for this, which is about 72hours.

The judge is pissed right now, because her leaving and going to house arrest was not brought to his attention considering he is still presiding over her.

Tom_PM 06-08-2007 09:35 AM

Why dont they just crash their cars and helicopters and planes into the damn house and free us from this bullshit? I mean christ. They broke into the paris hilton coverage a minute ago to announce that defense secretary Gates is replacing joint chief of staff general Pace.

TV "news" is just tabloid tv any more. They should all be reclassified as Entertainment networks IMHO. No more free ride until they cover NEWS goddamnit.

Clark 06-08-2007 09:37 AM

I really don't care what happens to her but it needs to happen soon so the FIVE fucking helicopters will go away from over my place and the NB offices.

Yesterday we watched a news van trying to get a spot with the other four news vans slam into a car parked on Sunset. It's insane around here right now.

Ravage 06-08-2007 09:38 AM

You can't buy publicity like this

chAos 06-08-2007 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D (Post 12567400)
You may be right on the summary probation thing - I dunno. Ever consider she received this slap on the wrist in the first place because of her status? It seems she was given plenty of preferential treatment in the past - reflected by the fact that she seems to be the first person released from sheriff's custody due to "medical problems."



I know someone who went to jail for his first offense of driving with a suspended liscence (actually he had just parked his car) off Sunset. No other crimes were in the process of being committed - including wreckless driving or break of probation.



I think that's very debatable. To me, it simply seems he noticed someone that considered herself impervious to the system, and so saught the maximum he could under the law in an effort to impart onto her that she wasn't. As an Angelino with something very personal at stake in this matter (as I've expressed a couple times now), I, for one, would not have felt she would have been reformed with a simple anklet for a few weeks.



What country are you from again? Nazi Germany? Imperial Rome?

We have this thing called constitutional cgovernment in the U.S. It's the job of the judiciary to interpret law. It's the job of the executive (e.g. the sheriff's office) to execute those interpretations. I know most Americans have fogotten this facet of the way things work here in the last 7 years - but , I assure you, it's still the basis of our State Governments, at least.


Thank god someone here is talking some fucking sense. LOL .. For anyone's information on "summary" probation you do not have a PO but you agree to not commit any crimes. That includes speeding if the judge sees fit. Paris should be in jail for 45 days cause she was driving on a suspended because of a DUI. If her license was suspended for tickets or something like that then they would not have given her that. But they have specific punishments for DUI violators. I saw a guy get 5 years for a 5th DUI and he was sitting in his truck not moving. So give up the boo hoo shit for paris and let her serve time like the rest of us.

P.S.
She could have ordered Kosher meals in there they are a little better. At least you do not have to eat the pork they serve everyday.

carol.prime 06-08-2007 10:38 AM

if she's just an ordinary person no one will pay attention and doesn't give a damn to her...popularity counts...
she's in showbiz and a rich woman so what are we expecting for?..

xxxjay 06-08-2007 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12566800)
Bullshit. She was on summary probation which means she was not assigned a probation officer and did not have to report to anyone. It also means that, under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one is not violated unless it is for an identical offense. In her case that would be a second DUI during the term of probation, which she did not have.

She apparently was stoped on two occasions with a suspended license and under normal circumstances, or for the average person, one would have paid a fine on the first offense, and possibly, just possibly, one would have been sentenced to, possibly, just possibly up to 72 hours in jail, to be served at the discretion of the Sheriff depending upon jail crowding. Most, if not all jails in California are grossly overcrowed.

The judge in her case was out of line in her sentencing and if he overrides the decision of the Sheriff to place her under home arrest he will be out of line yet once again.

She is a celebrity but she should not be treated differently than the average person would be and yet she has been. She has been treated worse because of her celebrity and was actually placed in maximum security (solitary confinement for her own protection) which is harsh and is usually reserved for problem inmates.

You are on crack:
http://www.snizzshare.com/view_video...70e9a56ceeabc4

Or maybe it's just me.

CosmicTang 06-08-2007 01:35 PM

different POV

http://www.pigdog.org/auto/bad_people/link/3040.html

Sexxxy Sites 06-08-2007 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by D (Post 12567400)
You may be right on the summary probation thing - I dunno. Ever consider she received this slap on the wrist in the first place because of her status? It seems she was given plenty of preferential treatment in the past - reflected by the fact that she seems to be the first person released from sheriff's custody due to "medical problems."


She did not recieve a slap on the wrist in the first place. She recieved what an average person would recieve for a first offense. It is not infrequent for a person to be let out of jail to serve house arrest for many different reasons including medical reasons. So you are wrong.


Quote:

I know someone who went to jail for his first offense of driving with a suspended liscence (actually he had just parked his car) off Sunset. No other crimes were in the process of being committed - including wreckless driving or break of probation.

You are not telling the whole story, and maybe were not told the whole story. There would not be any jail time for anyone with a first offense. So you are wrong.


Quote:

I think that's very debatable. To me, it simply seems he noticed someone that considered herself impervious to the system, and so saught the maximum he could under the law in an effort to impart onto her that she wasn't. As an Angelino with something very personal at stake in this matter (as I've expressed a couple times now), I, for one, would not have felt she would have been reformed with a simple anklet for a few weeks.
The punishment is supposed to fit the crime and driving with a suspended license is not much of a crime.



Quote:

What country are you from again? Nazi Germany? Imperial Rome?

We have this thing called constitutional cgovernment in the U.S. It's the job of the judiciary to interpret law. It's the job of the executive (e.g. the sheriff's office) to execute those interpretations. I know most Americans have fogotten this facet of the way things work here in the last 7 years - but , I assure you, it's still the basis of our State Governments, at least.
The Sheriff has the power to release inmates from his jail for many different reasons and he exercises that power virtually every day. It is SOP to the point that he does not normally file with the court, as he is technically required to do. Normally Judges do not interrfer with the power of the Sheriff as this Judge has.

I will not be surprised to see the Sheriff file the proper paper work with the court and she will be released to house arrest once again.

nAtuRaLbEautY 06-08-2007 01:53 PM

if hilton was anyone else..it wouldn't be so hard to find a picture of her behind the bars..naked lol!

xxxjay 06-08-2007 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12568973)
She did not recieve a slap on the wrist in the first place. She recieved what an average person would recieve for a first offense. It is not infrequent for a person to be let out of jail to serve house arrest for many different reasons including medical reasons. So you are wrong.





You are not telling the whole story, and maybe were not told the whole story. There would not be any jail time for anyone with a first offense. So you are wrong.




The punishment is supposed to fit the crime and driving with a suspended license is not much of a crime.





The Sheriff has the power to release inmates from his jail for many different reasons and he exercises that power virtually every day. It is SOP to the point that he does not normally file with the court, as he is technically required to do. Normally Judges do not interrfer with the power of the Sheriff as this Judge has.

I will not be surprised to see the Sheriff file the proper paper work with the court and she will be released to house arrest once again.

Why don't you an Paris get a room? Driving on a suspended license is serious. Driving and violating parole / probabtion even more so.

Sexxxy Sites 06-08-2007 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 12569146)
Why don't you an Paris get a room? Driving on a suspended license is serious. Driving and violating parole / probabtion even more so.

I am not a fan of Paris and no, driving on a suspended license is not a serious offense and no, breaking summary probation is not a serious offense. Jail time is not usually given for driving on a suspended license and even if it is the outside range is normally no more than 72 hours max.

D 06-08-2007 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12568973)
She did not recieve a slap on the wrist in the first place. She recieved what an average person would recieve for a first offense. It is not infrequent for a person to be let out of jail to serve house arrest for many different reasons including medical reasons. So you are wrong.

I'm not sure what you're going on, but I'm going on the reports given in the last 24 hours from Los Angeles Country Prosecutors and criminal analysts. From what I read, they haven't heard of an inmate being released from custody for medical reasons in Los Angeles County before.... they've instead been transferred to medical facilities.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12568973)
You are not telling the whole story, and maybe were not told the whole story. There would not be any jail time for anyone with a first offense. So you are wrong.

Maybe you're right. I can only go on what I witnessed, what I was told, and what the cops said as they arrested my friend in front of me. it's possible I misunderstood what the police were saying, and my friend was less than honest with me because he was embarrassed or whatever - but I don't think so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12568973)
The punishment is supposed to fit the crime and driving with a suspended license is not much of a crime.

She was also violating her probation and driving recklessly... and - on a personal note - on a street that my girlfriend drives home on every night, against the redundant instructions of a court to her. I think that's a significant crime, myself. It's not like she's going to jail for years here - she's in and out inside a month due to her being advanced an early release due to expected good behavior (and I'm not going to even bother touching that one). The judge noticed a person that has shown time and time again that she has no respect for the system - he gave her chances, and she laughed at him for doing so - maybe it's time for her to learn a little respect - the judge certainly seems to think so.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12568973)
The Sheriff has the power to release inmates from his jail for many different reasons and he exercises that power virtually every day. It is SOP to the point that he does not normally file with the court, as he is technically required to do. Normally Judges do not interrfer with the power of the Sheriff as this Judge has.

I will not be surprised to see the Sheriff file the proper paper work with the court and she will be released to house arrest once again.

Even with the proper paperwork, no sheriff has the right to overturn the ruling of a judge - and that's exactly what happened here. In this case, explicit instructions were given that were not followed. After having given those explicit instructions, the call is the judge's, not the sheriff's - regardless of what paperwork was filed or was not filed.

The United States isn't a despotism.... yet.

Hollywood Horwitz 06-08-2007 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClimaxXx (Post 12567662)
Apparently painting the jail bars like penises didn't make her feel at home, at all... Poor girl... I hope she didn't hurt her teeth on them...

Ah, I love Sarah Silverman... Those who caught the highlights of the MTV Video Awards know what I'm talking about... haha

xXx

Sarah killed it with that joke!

Sexxxy Sites 06-08-2007 04:30 PM

Quote:

Even with the proper paperwork, no sheriff has the right to overturn the ruling of a judge - and that's exactly what happened here. In this case, explicit instructions were given that were not followed. After having given those explicit instructions, the call is the judge's, not the sheriff's - regardless of what paperwork was filed or was not filed.
The paper work is susposed to be filed with the Court to get Court approval, but because it has been so common over the years the paper work is not usually filed because most Judges simply do not interrfer with the Sheriff's decisions.

BTW, there has been in the past, people "released" from jail and from prison because of medical reasons, so that they may seek private treatment.

D 06-08-2007 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12569588)
The paper work is susposed to be filed with the Court to get Court approval, but because it has been so common over the years the paper work is not usually filed because most Judges simply do not interrfer with the Sheriff's decisions.

I'm wondering how many of those 'common' cases dealt with the Sheriff violating an explicit order of the court, as this one did.

I have no doubt that the Sheriff makes calls that release people early or to house arrest every day... "released into the custody of the Sheriff's office" and all... but if the judge says "do not do this thing," the Sheriff isn't supposed to do that thing. The Sheriff operates at the behest of the courts - as, with the exception of "pardons," all members of the executive are supposed to.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sexxxy Sites (Post 12569588)
BTW, there has been in the past, people "released" from jail and from prison because of medical reasons, so that they may seek private treatment.

I'm not saying it hasn't happened - I'm saying that County Criminal Analysts are saying that it hasn't happened for the term of a sentence in Los Angeles County... which seems to be at the heart of the issue here.

Huggles 06-08-2007 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 12564571)
She would be locked up for a long ass time. Probation violations are no joke!



I know a dude who got 14 days in jail for his first offense of a suspended license


Paris thought she was above the law

shekinah 06-08-2007 05:06 PM

she's such an untouchable bitch!:(


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc