GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   4 Teens killed when they hit train (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=743019)

RawAlex 06-15-2007 06:36 AM

4 Teens killed when they hit train
 
The story is on the front of CNN right now. It is a truly tragic story, but it shows exactly what is wrong with the mentality of most Americans when it comes to liablity.

6 teens, ranging in age from 13 to 15, are off joyriding in a stolen SUV. Okay, so let's see. None of them are old enough to have a license. The vehicle is stolen. Got it?

Oh, did I mention it is something like 3 in the morning?

Apparently they are flying down a two lane road in the dark at high speed in a stolen vehicle without a license and they slam into the side of a stopped train (it was dark, they didn't see it, apparently) and 4 girls in the back seat are killed.

Wait for it: There is only 3 seatbelts in the back seat, it is a 5 passenger SUV (old cherokee).

Now, the father of one of the girls, who lives very close to the place where the accident occurs is up in the face of the railroad people for parking a train there (apparently happens fairly often). He says basically "If you didn't park the train there, my daughter wouldn't be dead, you fucker!" or something to that effect.

Holy shit. My mind reels dealing with this sort of fucked up logic.

Dude, I know you just lost your daughter and you are probably saying some stupid shit, but...

It's 3 fucking AM. Why is your 15 year old daughter out at that time without an adult?

What the fuck is she doing in a stolen car? Without a icensed driver? Speed in the dark.... likely without her seatbelt on because there wasn't enough to go around anyway?

There is any number of points along this story where the parent could have taken their personal responsbility and none of this would have happened. Blaming the railroad for parking the train there is so fucking far down the list...

Sadly, he will probably sue the railroad and win.

tort reform. It's needed.

Scott McD 06-15-2007 06:44 AM

They had it coming to them. Sucks, but it's true.

Blaming anyone or anything else is just plain retarded...

baddog 06-15-2007 09:52 AM

I believe it is called contributory negligence.

TubeTitans_SusieQ 06-15-2007 09:54 AM

yea it doesnt make sense at all, parents need to be more responsible for their children, clearly they shouldnt have been out at that time...

Michaelious 06-15-2007 09:55 AM

Surely the train hit them?

uno de ellos 06-15-2007 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michaelious (Post 12605259)
Surely the train hit them?

yup, it was waiting for them, then jumped out at the last second... there was nothing they could do

KimJI 06-15-2007 10:12 AM

Why be responsible when you can sue and blame other people? its the american way

SilkyJohnson 06-15-2007 10:21 AM

I'm sure the money they get from the lawsuit will replace their daughter just fine. :disgust

TimBlaze 06-15-2007 10:21 AM

certain ppl wanna blame everyone else.... whenever a kid is violent its because of 50 Cent... whenever a kid smokes weed its because of Snoop Dogg and Method Man... whenever a kid rams a stolen SUV into a parked train...it's the train

RawAlex 06-15-2007 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12605234)
I believe it is called contributory negligence.

Yup, and it is the worst type of stupid legal result possible.

There was any number of steps that could have been taken to prevent this accident. The crossing, while in a dark place, does have non-lit crossing sites, and it isn't like someone snuck in late at night and suddenly plunked train tracks down. A train being on the train tracks... who would have thunk it?

The train company should sue the parents for damaging their train and loss of use of the tracks.

LiveDose 06-15-2007 10:25 AM

Thank god those fucking morons didn't kill innocent people. BooHoo.

Spunky 06-15-2007 10:26 AM

Jeez..what a tragic way to lose your life

NinjaSteve 06-15-2007 10:31 AM

Holy shit! Seat belts save lives....

Miss Munki 06-15-2007 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TimBlaze (Post 12605399)
certain ppl wanna blame everyone else.... whenever a kid is violent its because of 50 Cent... whenever a kid smokes weed its because of Snoop Dogg and Method Man... whenever a kid rams a stolen SUV into a parked train...it's the train

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

bvds 06-15-2007 01:31 PM

May they R.I.P.

Matt 26z 06-15-2007 02:01 PM

Forget who was driving the car or that it was stolen. Should trains be allowed to stop on unlighted crossings? Maybe there needs to be a law that at least puts light reflectors on all train cars.

Jarmusch 06-15-2007 02:04 PM

Only in america.

Evil Chris 06-15-2007 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RawAlex (Post 12605402)
The train company should sue the parents for damaging their train and loss of use of the tracks.

That's precisely what should happen.

madawgz 06-15-2007 02:13 PM

what a way to go...

SmokeyTheBear 06-15-2007 02:16 PM

theres alwasy 2 ways to look at it..

just because one party is grossly negligent doesn't mean the other party is also not grossly negligent. A court case is used to decide who is more negligent..

common sense i suppose might say both sides were equally negligent , but the train didnt lose a daughter.

If your drunk driving and hit a stolen car your still negligent for the damages you cause.

Rochard 06-15-2007 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt 26z (Post 12606583)
Forget who was driving the car or that it was stolen. Should trains be allowed to stop on unlighted crossings? Maybe there needs to be a law that at least puts light reflectors on all train cars.

This sounds correct in concept. However, I'm sure there is more to the story. Sounds to me it was some dirt road not really meant to be a crossing.

I'm sorry; I feel for his loss of his 15 year old daughter. However, she was cruising around in a stolen SUV (breaking the law) and not wearing her seat belt (again breaking the law). Chances are there were dozens of other laws breaking (speeding, etc).

The person at fault here is the driver who was speeding down the road in a stolen SUV with passengers who didnt' have their seat belts on.

Man, if this happened to me I'd be pissed.

Rochard 06-15-2007 02:46 PM

Here's a CNN video link:
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/play...its.train.khou

Rochard 06-15-2007 02:48 PM

Seems to me this wasn't a dirt road, but a someone commonly used paved road - with no lights or anything. The SUV hit it's breaks thirty-five feet from the tracks.

They never had a chance.

Can someone explain to me why in the world a train would be sitting blocking a road with no lights? At 3am in the morning?

Can somone explain to me how they don't have lights at a rail road crossing?

Scootermuze 06-15-2007 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 12605234)
I believe it is called contributory negligence.

The railroad co. could use that as part of their defense, but not the father as part of his complaint..

Contributory negligence says that a plaintiff was also negligent in some way that helped contribute to the problem..

p1mpdogg 06-15-2007 03:48 PM

the father should be allowed to fuck the wife of the train conductor to get another daughter, word!

DaddyHalbucks 06-15-2007 04:13 PM

I think the SUV driver was more liable than the train operator.

BangTheChamp 06-15-2007 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KimJI (Post 12605349)
Why be responsible when you can sue and blame other people? its the american way

i second that motion:thumbsup

aico 06-15-2007 04:33 PM

they were probably fat too.

notabook 06-15-2007 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilkyJohnson (Post 12605398)
I'm sure the money they get from the lawsuit will replace their daughter just fine. :disgust

With cloning technology? hmm.. maybe :upsidedow

TehKinkyHotness 06-15-2007 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 12606829)
Seems to me this wasn't a dirt road, but a someone commonly used paved road - with no lights or anything. The SUV hit it's breaks thirty-five feet from the tracks.

They never had a chance.

Can someone explain to me why in the world a train would be sitting blocking a road with no lights? At 3am in the morning?

Can somone explain to me how they don't have lights at a rail road crossing?


And then tell me why there are teenagers from the ages of 13-15 driving a stolen suv at 3 am?

Sorry but they had what was coming, so did the parents. Parents should step up to the plate and take control of their shitbag kids. I see this kinda stupid shit everywhere. Always someone elses fault.

Retarded parents = eat my ass.

Mutt 06-15-2007 04:38 PM

need more details - if a court decides that the train being left where it was with little illumination and that it was a potential hazard to drivers then they have a great case. if a judge determines even a cold sober driver might have made met the same fate then whether the kids were drunk or not shouldn't matter that much, when assessing damages/fault i'm sure the judge would take it into consideration.

i seriously doubt that somebody is leaving a train in the middle of an unlit road crossing - there'd be dead people every other week.

Expo_Vids 06-15-2007 04:41 PM

The fact they were driving a stolen car at 3 am or that they were not wearing seat belts hase nothing to fucking do with it. What the fuck is that train doing sitting there in the middle of the night with no lights on it or on the signs?!!!

TehKinkyHotness 06-15-2007 04:48 PM

Another thing, even in the pitch black, if you had headlights on, you would be able to see this train much farther away than 35 feet.

beemk 06-15-2007 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TehKinkyHotness (Post 12607309)
And then tell me why there are teenagers from the ages of 13-15 driving a stolen suv at 3 am?

Sorry but they had what was coming, so did the parents. Parents should step up to the plate and take control of their shitbag kids. I see this kinda stupid shit everywhere. Always someone elses fault.

Retarded parents = eat my ass.

i agree, its horrible what happened, but its nobody's fault but the kids and the parents. i dont know about you, but if i'm driving down a road at night i use my headlights. i'm surely going to see a tran if its in the way of my driving path. theres reasons they dont let kids without drivers training on the road, and this is one of them.

Rochard 06-15-2007 05:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beemk (Post 12607372)
i agree, its horrible what happened, but its nobody's fault but the kids and the parents. i dont know about you, but if i'm driving down a road at night i use my headlights. i'm surely going to see a tran if its in the way of my driving path. theres reasons they dont let kids without drivers training on the road, and this is one of them.

One would think so. But how do we know they weren't coming around a curve and that's why they didnt' see the train?

You blame the parents? Those of you who blame the parents must not have kids, because - as scary as this sounds - you do not always know where your kids are at all times. The sleep over at a friends house..... sneak out....

When I was sixteen I lied about having to go to work - two nights in a row. The first night I had my driver's license confiscated by an off duty cop, and when I went out the next night to the police station to get it back I lost control of my car, and hit another car head on at 40mph. The car I hit had a 14 year old mentally retarded kid and his mother in the car. (Thankfully no one was serously hurt.)

I also remember when I was a kid one of my classmates snuck out, grabbed the family car, ended up drinking, and drove off a cliff.

We all did stupid shit when we were kids. Some of us lived to tell about it.

Drake 06-15-2007 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 12607312)
need more details - if a court decides that the train being left where it was with little illumination and that it was a potential hazard to drivers then they have a great case. if a judge determines even a cold sober driver might have made met the same fate then whether the kids were drunk or not shouldn't matter that much, when assessing damages/fault i'm sure the judge would take it into consideration.

i seriously doubt that somebody is leaving a train in the middle of an unlit road crossing - there'd be dead people every other week.

Yeah, that needs to be determined. Quite frankly the kids involved were irresponsible on many levels, but I can't say I'm keen on the idea of a train blocking a crossroad at night where there are no lights.

tehHinjew 06-15-2007 06:10 PM

oh i thoght this was in montreal

tehHinjew 06-15-2007 06:12 PM

where is george carlin when you need him, send him to talk to the parents lol

TTiger 06-15-2007 06:45 PM

4 darwin awards in 1 shot!

Iron Fist 06-15-2007 09:06 PM

Sure they can sue - but the fact still stands.. your daughter is still dead.

HA HA. Seriously.

shekinah 06-15-2007 09:51 PM

poor teens.. they are too young to die:(

beemk 06-15-2007 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 12607410)
One would think so. But how do we know they weren't coming around a curve and that's why they didnt' see the train?

did you watch the video you posted earlier in the thread? the road looks pretty wide open to me, and i dont know about you, but i slow down when i go around curves that might restrict my view.

cooluks 06-16-2007 04:00 AM

Tragic one....

tsk... tsk...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123