"Normal" girls don't feel so bad about yourselves
 

Clebs really don't look that good

http://jezebel.com/gossip/photoshop-...god-278919.php

http://jezebel.com/assets/resources/...ranime0707.gif

Ugly bitch.

ugly ugly and ugly

holy shit....

yeah i agree!

Holy crap.. look at all the fatback they removed where her dress starts in the back.

That really should be illegal. I mean seriously. I would bet money that in any magazine of that genre, not one single image is left un-photochopped.

Dear Penthouse,

Normally I would never write about anything to a magazine, much less a magazine such as yours, but I just couldn't believe what happened the other day...

I find it sad that they have to do that to sell the magazines.

That woman by no means looks bad in either photo. But she for sure looks 10 times better in the Choped one.

well i, for one, feel better :winkwink:

lol How true! :thumbsup

I see hotter girls at the mall and airport than most celebs.

wow thats great lol

WOW! It makes me feel a little better about myself.

Dont you feel that there should be a labelling requirement right on the cover saying something like "This photo has been CHOPPED to hell and back in order to create the appearance of anorexia." or something? I mean jeez. It's not a "photograph" after that, it's "photo art" at best..

ps: How about magazines adding 20 pounds, removing chunks of hair and increasing wrinkles. Is that ok?

I personally don't see the problem with it. If I ever have a chance to have my photo in a magazine or seen by thousands of people, then somebody damn sure better photoshop the hell out of it or I will be majorly pissed.

If I had her money, I'd hire whoever did that full time to make all my family and personal photos look the same way. Then I'd have anybody killed who pointed out that I don't really look like that.

wow, nice photoshop there!!!...i respectfully disagree that she's ugly..definitely not. its just that she's old and has wrinkles in her face also her body is not that sexy anymore...imho

I love how they just eliminate the bags under her eyes. Then they probably sell tons of miracle eye makeup inside. Maybe they should sell photoshop in the mags? :upsidedow

She looks GREAT in the real photograph! It's the chopped one that looks fake and unhealthy.

Look at her arm, is that a healthy human arm? Looks like she was just freed from auschwitz. I'm sorry but what the hell.

IMHO Faith Hill should be pissed and complain. Her chopped image now goes along with all the thousands of others that make girls jam their fingers down their throats in the middle and at the end of every meal.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I love the way you think

She's hot either way....

Yeah, I don't see why it's necessary to photoshop her when she still looks good naturally.

haha see what photochop can do...

This suprises anyone?

LOL wow all you need to do is hire some kid with photoshop and save on the talent costs!

The only people who could possibly find fault with this are: 1) straight guys, and 2) women who don't shave their armpits.

I personally think it's right up there with heart transplants and the automobile.

I hate when dudes make a huge deal about celeb girls. Most of them don't look as good as you think. I rode the 6 train in NYC the other day, and there about 5 girls in my car who looked just as good as Jessica Alba.

i want to have the motherfucker buried alive that made that fucking wonderbra thing. literally. that should be illegal.

You gotta love photoshop...

I know I do.

I've gotten rid of a few wrinkels in my head shots.

nice substitute for getting enough sleep.

not something I typically do on my shots (although when it's for a client, you do what they want)... but you have to give props to the PS pro... did a great job.

Pretty lady in the original shot.... they just made her out to be a "ideal" in the second... i would still hit the first one.

oh photoshop.. where would i be without you?

Well.. you were right.. I feel much better :-)

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

But the bad part is that you even think like this when I'd probably hit it all night as you are anyway. And that's why the photochop is a bad thing.

Elementry Students are taught photoshoppe.

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Yes it is just fine. It is done in adult all the time too. I have done magazine shoots and they will airbrush out anything not in place. Even a strand of hair out of place, gone. Same with a lot of websites, they do airbrush overload. I have met women at webmaster gatherings and did not know recognize because they did not look a thing like their pics. I thought with photoshop you are just supposed to get rid of a zit, a bruise, maybe bags under the eyes, but not make a whole new person.

Not where I live. My son's 6th grade "computer" class is what we used to call TYPING class. He didn't learn jack about "computers".

thats a nice animation :D

I've seen how this works firsthand, but it's about rather small, if annoying details, hardly about reinventing someone.

If not for that terrible dress and her pose I would swear it's not the same woman, but rather a mother and a daughter.

ditto :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Very true!

Wow no wonder women throw up their lunches

Why does Milf sell so well on the web and they don't want it on magazine covers? BTW, I agree that she's hot in the before pic.

For you to earn money, you should make ugly Betty a beauty:thumbsup

You guys are blind, stupid and gay.

Yeah, Faith Hill is ugly, right. Let's see some pics of the supermodels you guys exclusively date.


Waiting...


:1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

thats great :)

They have done much worse in the past...at one point a magazine photoshopped Julia Roberts head on her body from like 10 years earlier.

huge difference :)