PureTNA - TNA Flix - um does anybody care?
 

jesus christ what the hell is happening? look at this -

Traffic Rank for puretna.com: 884

http://www.puretna.com

and http://www.tnaflix.com

here's a nice free full episode from Big Tits Round Asses - I'm glad to see that Legendary Tard and Andrew Cornhole are making lots of money off Bangbros.

http://www.tnaflix.com/view_video.ph...1906f2819ae126

i have a question for Playboy - why is AFF and Cams allowed to advertise on GFY?

Lars already told you haters. Its user submitted content. Its not their or the site owners fault - they do nothing wrong. And they donate a lot of money to FSC and ASCAPCASAPCA or whatever its called, so how could they be bad?

Maybe you should talk to Python and Adultpaymaster and tell them not to pay there bills

im just here for the free tshirt

http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/9548/pythonvl1.jpg
Python

http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6...ymasterkr9.jpg
Adultpaymaster

screens taken 10 mins ago,

its so sad and so dumb.

bump bump

just went through my icq logs: already reported puretna to AFF on the 13th of March...

I'm sure you're not the only one.

Yup, they've been around for a while now. The tnaflix is new though.

oh nice - Lightspeed's Tawnee Stone brought to you by the fine folks at Python Entertainment. shady fuckers.

Aff is on every torrent,warez,rapidshare or any kind of content stealing site so i dont think reporting them to aff will make any change.

the question remains - why does Playboy as the owner of GFY do business with AFF any longer when it has clearly been demonstrated for months that AFF/Cams is a rogue company intent on profiting from theft at the expense of so many webmaster and many companies that are long time advertisers here?

this deserves a quote...

I see Fling on there too :(

Smokey asked these questions months ago and they went ignored. Why do the let sexsearch buy ads here when they steal daily with zango, why do they let sexbankroll when they steal daily with zango, why do they let dating gold when they are on many torrent sites and tube sites, why do they let fling when they are on many tube and torrent sites, why do they let eroticy when they are on many tube and torrent sites, why do they let adult pay master when they are on many tube and torrent sites, why do they let python when they are on many tube and torrent sites, why do they let movie profits/wildcash when they are on many tube and torrent sites.

That's A LOT of ad revenue a month, we're talking into the multiple thousands of dollars a month. I can go to most of these sites and watch full episodes of many playboy/adult.com/realitycash.com full length movies, you can also download full length copies of playboy magazine in PDF form.

Let's not mention that you can find a good amount of CP in these sites which goes ignored and many programs listed above support these sites then turn the money over to the ASACP. To me this is fucked, when I go to Guba/Skin Video and see the big proud member of the ASACP on it, it makes me sick. If they are here for US, they should not accept money from people who 1 rip of us, and 2 pay people and profit from trafficking CP to millions of people.

I have a bit of info on TNA and have been working on some things going on, but of course I am only one person so I can only do so much, and more so I do need to work as well so yeah.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

bump for the cause

I am praying to Saint Jude to stop this, alas, I fear hope is hanging on by a fibre optic thread, and that thread is being used to download stolen content at gigs per second...

holy shit... what a traffic rank!

i have a feeling playboy owns a stake in aff or someone at playboy is slowly selling/trading off the company to the "new trend" in porn.

just makes zero sense why they would let aff profit from the theft of their products, unless they are in partnership and stand to gain in the long run..

Like lets say i was in charge of playboy web division and i buy a bunch of aff stock and ignore the problem , hef loses cash while i make a bankroll.

many torrent sites have every issue of playboy before i get mine in my mail. i have been a playboy subscriber for ages , and i cancelled mine a bit ago because i can get the brand new ones from the sites aff advertises on , and aff is a playboy sponsor so.. they must support it.. i asked them about it and got no response

Money. Plain and simple. :)

if you pay enough money you get your ad on wherever you want to...

So this is how it goes...
Some affiliate programs are frustrated because some of the content they try to sell are being offered in Bittorrent/Tube sites for free. So the first thing they fear is that net value of a customer will decrease over time. Tube/BT sites are getting bigger and bigger all the time and "compete" with those affiliate programs so to say by offering content for free. A good example of this fear can be found for instance with VG contnet. just follow his posts. So what does VG contnet try to do in order to stop the phenomena - he tries to call all Bittorrent sites illegal and thief's and tries to accuse the advertisers running on those sites . He thinks that Iis his business interest to destroy those sites completely.

Now this is the reality:
most of the tube sites and the big bittorrent sites are actually DMCA complaint, meaning if those site get a request from a publisher or right owner to delete a torrent/movie they would do that instantly. This is a fact! and no one including VG contnet can prove else wise. (remember that I have said most and not all)

So instead of accusing the advertisers and the rest of the world, why VG contnet is not asking himself why doesn't he protect and police his intellectual property on the net? Why isn't he sending DMCAs to puretna or to megarotic? (and if he has done let him please present it in this thread otherwise we can only assume he did not) why he does not accuse his content owners/partners for not sending DMCAs and policing their content?

the point is that VG contnet will still be frustrated on those sites also if they will not include even one single byte of his content. You know why? Because they will still have a shit load of content to offer for free and they will still be a threat and competition for him. So DMCA is not of any value for VG contnet ! That's why he does not practice it from his side. if VG contnet thinks that his attitude is going to solve the situation - let me tell him that he is totally wrong. If he thinks that cutting the sponsors from BT site and tube sites is going to stop them from existence - then he is a boy, if he thinks that his attitude is going to stop them from doing money - he is probably stupid as well! on the contrary his attitude will cause those sites (are turning out to be the biggest engine deriving new business for content owners) defendant rather then coperative! So killing sites like that will actually hurt the industry and reduce the sales of porn even more!

What do you think TGP sites, BT site and tube sites sell? only Dating product? Not at all! the majority of the revenues come from paid programs! isn't that a contradiction? how come a user buys a program from a site that offered it for free? Let me tell you why.... porn is an addiction - its like cigarettes - the people that buy porn are the ones that consume if for free at the same time. one can only think that the people that are buying porn on the net are the ones that are not aware of the methods getting it for free. But that's not the case! the best valued customers are the ones that consume porn for free on the net at the same time.. So killing those BT tube sites is going only the hurt the industry as a whole! the total revenues are going to shrink.


On the legal side of things, most of the Bittorrent/tune sites are legal as long as they comply with DMCA or practice it is some other manner! as long as they work things out with the publishers on an abuse/file/page basis. You all need to understand that Bittorrent sites and tube sites are a platfrom... the admins of the sites do not have any judgment what's the content types that are being submitted buy many thousands and thousands of users. They do not upload the stuff themselves and they do not tell other users what to upload... its like an internet democracy! If copyright owner has a problem with an act of one of the many users/submitters and he does not practice DMCA then he hasn't got any right to call them thief's and accuse all of the world. He should rather re examine his own business practices