Would you give up 20 years of life...
 

For 10 million dollars?

darn edit button is gone

Lets say you have to cut 20 years of the end of your life.. so would you take the money?

Hell, no!

If I knew I was originally going to live to 120 I'd consider it.

How about 30 years for 24 million, surely.:1orglaugh

Depends on where you have to spend the 20 years. Yah I'll give it up living where there is good surf.

hell no! And yet there's already one person who would according to the stats. WTF!?

I can make that in a month of time with free trial signups..so ...NO!

no way ...

no, and i had a better one but i lost the thread..

hell nah

depends, im 22 right now, take 20 years off my life, if i die at age 42, then probably not, but if i die at say 100+ then sure i would

No.

I get one shot at life, and have no intention of wasting it.

There's no guarantee that you will be healthy, or alive in 20 years time.

:2 cents:

Nope


8char

Life is too short, so no

yeah sure

no way!)

if it means living to 80 instead of 90 sure. but young years of my life, no way.

This is a good deal for someone who is young and real broke with few prospects. ;-)

nope never

american dollars? :helpme:1orglaugh

God no, not even for a billion.

Maybe that person doesn't have 20 years left.

GFY as the dumbest questions ever... LOLOL

What he said.

How about just making 10 million in the next 20 years? That’s more feasible.

What if you make the deal, and then get hit by a car the next year? That would suck.

I think I'd take my chances with what I currently have.

Sure, I'm going to live until I'm 125 yrs old. So give me $10 million and you can kill me on my 105th Birthday. We will call it assisted suicide.

no way, even as little as 5 years

Nope. Time and freedom is way too precious.

atleast you had $10mil for that 1 year, instead of struggling to make it by... :2 cents:

Not a chance

Honestly, I wouldn't give up a single year for 20 mil.

never. how could i be happy for that money if ill just give up my life?. even for 10 years, still NO!!!

Probably not when I was in my 20's
but now I figure I have maybe 30 years left with the end being somewhat semi broke, so to end up only having ten yrs left but with 10 million $ to play with I would say yes. At least then I know my kids would have everything they need.

american or canadian dollars?

Nop, cause every day of our life is priceless, plus 10 millions is not a big money novadays...:winkwink:

my answer it's no

To set up my daughter n family for life, Yes!

Not a chance, no questions.

what you will do with your millions $$$$ when you will be old ;enjoyh life now every day;

Only if I knew I had a short time to live left, that would make it worth while. I like the poster who answered he'd rather MAKE 10 m in 20 years! Thats thinking.l

I would die 90 years old in stead of 100. :)

Hmm, that translates to 500k/year, if it would be possible to do for example 2 years for a million then it's probably worth considering...

Where would you draw the line? How much do you think each year in jail is worth?

sorry no. I am happy and would prefer to live 20 more years.

No fucking way!

Possibly for 10 years... It saves you having to spend that much time working for that $$$, you could just enjoy it now.

Fuck no, i can make that in 20 years

It's kind of a silly question when you think about it, though. If you're willing to work hard for a mere 10 years, half the time, and sacrifice anything and everything to do whatever it takes to make $10 million you will likely reach your goal.

at a certain point it makes sense - ie 5M for 1-2 years when the last two years might be painful and crippled at 82. You have to look at how much your quality of life is impacted by the need to work to make ends meet and how that effects the quality of the existence you're giving up. 5M could free up 20 years of good quality life by removing the need for constant work.

Most people have to work 40+ hours a week at a job they don't like until they're 50+. Thats 87 days worth of work a year you could reclaim to a certain extent. There is definately a benefit once you take a few things into account once you look at variables like how much total work over your lifespan you could remove and replace with recreation, the quality of the work left over (still make business decisions but not be tied to the office), the age you were going to die - obviously 2 years if you've only got 5 left is too much.. the quality of life you'd be removing - whats two less years if your last ten is with alzhiemers and prostate cancer? and so on.
that said 20 years is a relatively obvious no no. I'd be happy just for a guarantee i'd be alive in 20 years.