![]() |
You fools do know that Mr Wiener is a partner in a firm that realy can own GFY right?
You fools do know that Mr Wiener is a partner in a firm that realy can own GFY right?
yeah I just looked and hes not just an attorney with the firm ... but a partner in a firm doing multi billion dollar biz overall... and you stupid fuckin monkeys are going to drag his name around GFY? wow... once again I cant believe how fuckin stupid you lames are. ..... get a life dude... seriously:2 cents: |
It's Weiner...
|
Quote:
and I must admit.. it is quite funny stupid .. but funny kinda like the 3 stooges |
maybe he will clean the place up once he owns it :winkwink:
let's tell him we all get paid $1 per post |
Quote:
|
The thread is all over other message boards on the net as well. Please see my Weiner reverse trolling thread.
|
Quote:
Quote:
ADG |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
This whole Real Sinatra tipping fiasco has future trouble written all over it.
This will end badly! |
Quote:
unlike a regular surfer the first thought that comes to mind for an attorney is " what can I gain from this, legally" and you dont make partner in a multi billion dollar law firm by being a pussy or incapable:2 cents: |
I wanna see where this goes.
|
http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/784734-weiner-thy-motherfucking-name.html
I'm trying desperately to warn of the dangers the all powerful weiner poses! but my efforts seems to be going unheeded. |
looks like they have 6 attornets dedicated to internet and communications and count the cable TV industry as clients
http://www.agg.com/Contents/Practice...il.aspx?ID=201 remember he is a "partner" someone is going to witness the power of the good ole boy network real soon here The Telecommunications Practice Team has represented a wide array of other telecommunications clients in numerous areas: Representation of a petroleum pipeline company in connection with a $100 million investment of cash and right-of-way rights in a "carrier’s carrier" telecom company Representation of a DirectTV distributor from its initial incorporation to its subsequent sale Representation of a satellite-to-PC media technology company from its initial incorporation until its subsequent sale Representation of a home security company in the negotiation of an alarm monitoring agreement with an RBOC Representing a business-to-business ISP in connection with its CLEC telephony services. if nothing else comes of it I am certain this kid will get fired from his waiter job |
pussyserver,
As much as the legal profession depends on research this man's name will be all over other law firms search results. Plus his legal bill will be zero, as you stated he's a partner in a heavy hitting firm. Poor dumb kid. His employer will be facing some legal expenses also. :2 cents: |
guys get a clue !
Pro lawyers dont sue waiters they sue people like Joe Francis :1orglaugh someone who can afford the damages. Would you spend time and money suing a waiter who complained of a tip so you get to collect $5 a week over 60 years,get real. And remember the biz rule : no publicity is bad publicity ask Paris Hilton, If you have sued anyone you will know its not something you rush into so its not going to happen but makes good drama Do you really think gfy would let this all carry on without looking at the situation :thumbsup its all good |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
thanks pussyserver I can see you havent been involved in many lawsuits :winkwink:
|
Quote:
then he will not take this lightly and with a firm so powerful ... all it takes is one canned letter to GFY host ( not the reseller ) but whomever owns the netblock etc and its all over I mean shit, they have a IT lawyer team :1orglaugh I couldnt think of any worse situation Hell a freshmen lawyer in the firm will make a mess of GFY just to impress a partner .... guys have no clue lol |
I pulled my Weiner to your cops banner
|
Step 1, he cannot "own" GFY for posts made by members.
Step 2, the threads discuss a post made by an intial member. There is only one source for this information, and therefore only one person to "own" Step 3, Mr Weiner would have to prove in a court of law that this is not true, that he is not a poor tipper, and that the information was not only spread, but that the intent was malicious. I wish Mr Weiner luck, and I am sure that co-council Mr Bun will be there to help him catch up. |
Quote:
|
oh and before you just realized this
your friend minusonebit realized it earlier http://www.gfy.com/13374200-post23.html who cares |
Quote:
The point I am making is this When you have a firm of that size ... with that many lawyers ... with those specific areas of practice .... you dont go to court ... you dont contest... they send you a letter telling you what to do... and you do it no company in its right mind ( GFY included ) is going to hire an attorney to prove its OK to have the partner of a major law firm drug across a porn forum lol:1orglaugh:1orglaugh people like that have power you wouldnt understand... he dosent have to prove or do anything except make a phone call or send a letter on his 100 plus law firms letterhead and whatever or whoever host or own whatever will simply bow the fuck dow ....I know I would :2 cents: watch those threads get deleted. I wouldnt spend one red cent in legal fees to protect a forum post .... from a huge law firm at that |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:02 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123